'- ' - ' ' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:

Cultural-historical meanings of the Third Rome

Tedeeva Tamara Totazovna

PhD in Cultural Studies

Postgraduate student, the deoartment of Design, Visual Arts and Humanities, Krasnodar State Institute of Culture

350072, Russia, 40 Let Pobedy oblast', g. Krasnodar, ul. 40 Let Pobedy, 702b, KGIK

toma.tedeeva.86@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2021.3.32321

Review date:

03-03-2020


Publish date:

06-07-2021


Abstract: In theoretical and sociopolitical discourses, the semantic construct “The Third Rome" is often used in denotative meaning of imperial ideology. At the same time, it has multivariate connotation, the disclosure of which in the cultural-historical context on the one hand allows deeper understanding of the semantic aspect of the construct, while on the other – more precisely characterizing the culture of different epochs. The object of this research is the historical process of saturation of the semantic construct “The Third Rome" with meaningful content. The subject of this research is the basic cultural- historical connotations the concept “The Third Rome”. The goal of this work is to establish correlation between the basic connotations of the concept under review and the historical cultures by means of culturological attribution. Alongside the general theoretical philosophical-analytical toolset, the author tests the method of culturological attribution in relation to cultural-historical meanings of the concept “The Third Rome" as intangible cultural artifacts. The novelty of this article consists in elucidation of the historical subjectivity of cultural meanings of the concept “The Third Rome”. Attribution of this concept to several historical cultures allows determining its multiple connotation, which at times are antipodal. The most common interpretation (“The Third Rome” as an empire) is applicable only to certain historical cultures.


Keywords: culture, religion, empire, cultural attribution, cultural concept, cultural meaning, historical process, national identity, Russian culture, Third Rome
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Fursov A. I. Tretii Rim i Tretii reikh: sovetsko-germanskii poker v amerikanskom preferanse // Zolotoi lev. 2006. 87-88 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.zlev.ru/87_38.htm (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2020).
2.
Akhiezer A. S. Sfera Mezhdu i ee osmyslenie // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2009. 5. S. 125-133.
3.
Stepin V.S., Smirnova N.M., Sineokaya Yu.V. Sushchestvuyut li metodologicheskii izomorfizm estestvennonauchnogo i sotsial'no-gumanitarnogo znaniya? // Filosofskii zhurnal. 2018. T. 11. 3. S. 150-165.
4.
Flier A. Ya. Filosofskie prolegomeny k Normativnoi teorii kul'tury// Kul'tura kul'tury. 2019. 4 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://cult-cult.ru/the-philosophical-prolegomena-to-a-normative-theory-of-culture/ (data obrashcheniya 10.10.2019).
5.
Zapesotskii A. S. Dmitrii Likhachev: u istokov otechestvennoi kul'turologii // Kontury budushchego v kontekste mirovogo kul'turnogo razvitiya XVIII Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya (Sankt-Peterburg, 17-19 maya 2018 g.) / red. A. S. Zapesotskii. SPb: SPbGUP, 2018. S. 251-255.
6.
Markaryan E. S. Teoriya kul'tury i sovremennaya nauka: logiko-metodologicheskii analiz. M.: Mysl', 1983. 284 s.
7.
Torosyan V. G. Kul'turologiya. Istoriya mirovoi i otechestvennoi kul'tury: ucheb / V. G. Torosyan. M.: Vlados, 2005. 631 s.
8.
Repina L. P. Konteksty intellektual'noi istorii // Dialog so vremenem. 2008. 25 (1). S. 511.
9.
Bakumenko G. V. Simvolizatsiya uspekha v sovremennom kinematografe: dis. kand. kul'turologii: 24.00.01 / Bakumenko Gennadii Vladimirovich. Armavir, 2019. 285 s. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://kgik1966.ru/content/cms/files/35034.pdf (data obrashcheniya 27.02.2020).
10.
Flier A. Ya. Kul'turnaya atributsiya kak metod issledovaniya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2011. 4. S. 139144. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnaya-atributsiya-kak-metod-issledovaniya (data obrashcheniya: 27.02.2020).
11.
Tsitseron. O gosudarstve, I, 4045 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://ancientrome.ru/antlitr/t.htm?a=1414870001#045 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2020).
12.
Evsevii Pamfil. Tserkovnaya istoriya / per. M. E. Sergeenko, komment. i primech. S. L. Kravtsa. M.: Izd. otd. Spaso-Preobrazhenskogo Valaamskogo monastyrya, 1993. 446,[1] s.
13.
Usachev A. S. Tretii Rim ili Tretii Kiev? (Moskovskoe tsarstvo XVI veka v vospriyatii sovremennikov) // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2012. 1. S. 6987.
14.
Arkhangel'skii Yu. E., Naidenko M. K., Lyakh V. I. Sushchnostnye protivorechiya sovetskoi kul'tury // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. 2018. 31. S. 282293. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/suschnostnye-protivorechiya-sovetskoy-kultury (data obrashcheniya: 27.02.2020).
15.
Laktantsii. O smertyakh presledovatelei / per. s lat., komment., ukazateli i bibliogr. spisok V. M. Tyuleneva. SPb.: Aleteiya, 1998. 279 s.
16.
Evsevii Pamfil. Zhizn' blazhennogo vasilevsa Konstantina = Ειστον βιον τον μακαπιου Κωνσταντινου του βασωλεωε. 2. izd. M: Labarum, 1998. 350, [1] s.
17.
Kurdybailo D. S. O ponyatii simvol v Evangel'skom dokazatel'stve Evseviya Kesariiskogo // Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya 1: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya. 2018. 78. S. 1127. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-ponyatii-simvol-v-evangelskom-dokazatelstve-evseviya-kesariyskogo (data obrashcheniya: 27.02.2020).
18.
Vashcheva I. Yu. Tserkovnaya istoriya Evseviya Kesariiskogo: terminologiya i problemy etnokul'turnoi identichnosti na poroge srednevekov'ya // Problemy istorii, filologii, kul'tury. 2018. 1 (59). S. 169183. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tserkovnaya-istoriya-evseviya-kesariyskogo-terminologiya-i-problemy-etno-kulturnoy-identichnosti-na-poroge-srednevekovya (data obrashcheniya: 27.02.2020).
19.
Akhiezer A. S. Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika Rossii. Novosibirsk: Sibirskii khronograf, 1997. 804 s.
20.
Akhiezer A. S. Mezhdu tsiklami myshleniya i tsiklami istorii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2002. 3. S. 122132.
21.
Evsevii Kesariiskii. Tserkovnaya istoriya / vvod. st., komment., bibliogr. spisok i ukazateli I. V. Krivushina. SPb.: Izd-vo Olega Abyshko, 2013. 544 s.
22.
Gurevich A. Ya. Problemy genezisa feodalizma v Zapadnoi Evrope. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1970. 224 s.
23.
Lebedev A. P. Istoriya razdeleniya tserkvei v IX, X i XI vekakh / red. M. A. Morozov. SPb.: Aleteiya, 1999. 308 s.
24.
Kharris Dzh. Vizantiya: istoriya ischeznuvshei imperii / per. s angl. N. Nartsissov. M.: ANF, 2017. 384 s.
25.
Frankopan P. Pervyi krestovyi pokhod. Zov s Vostoka / per. s angl. M. Vitebskii. M.: ANF, 2018. 351 s.
26.
Runciman S. A history of the First Bulgarian Empire. First ed. G. Bell & Sons, Ltd., 1930. 337 p.
27.
Chirkovich S. M. Istoriya serbov / per. s serbskogo F. B. Al'brekht, E. I. Yakushkina, A. A. Silkin. M.: Ves' Mir, 2009. 409 s.
28.
Naumov E. P. Gospodstvuyushchii klass i gosudarstvennaya vlast' v Serbii XIIXV vv.: Dinamika sotsial'noi i politicheskoi sistemy serbskogo feodalizma. M.: Nauka, 1975. 336 s.
29.
Alekseev A. I. Pod znakom kontsa vremen: Ocherki rus. religioznosti kontsa XIV-nachala XVI vv. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2002. 347, [3] s.
30.
Karavashkin A. V. Literaturnyi obychai Drevnei Rusi (XI-XVII vv.). M.; SPb: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2018. 720 s.
31.
Yurganov A. L. Kategorii russkoi srednevekovoi kul'tury. SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2009. 367 s.
32.
Filyushkin A. I. Tituly russkikh gosudarei. M.; SPb.: Al'yans-Arkheo, 2006. 254, [1] s.
33.
Sobranie gosudarstvennykh gramot i dogovorov. Chast' 5. Dogovory Rossii s evropeiskimi i aziatskimi gosudarstvami (13261584). S. 62 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://elib.shpl.ru/ru/nodes/8983-ch-5-dogovory-rossii-s-evropeyskimi-i-aziatskimi-gosudarstvami-1326-1584-1894#mode/inspect/page/116/zoom/6 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2020).
34.
Ul'yanov O. G. ROMA QUADRATA III. K 500-letiyu stroitel'stva dvortsa velikogo knyazya Ivana III v Kremle // Vekhi russkoi istorii v pamyatnikakh kul'tury. Makarievskie chteniya. Vyp. V. Mozhaisk, 1998. S. 508529.
35.
Astaf'ev P. E. Filosofiya natsii i edinstvo mirovozzreniya. Sbornik rabot. M.: Izd-vo zhurn. Moskva; Astra sem', 2000. 538, [1] s.
36.
Kireevskii I. V. Kritika i estetika. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 439 s.
37.
Tikhomirov L. A. Religiozno-filosofskie osnovy istorii. M.: Izd-vo FIV, 2012. 808 s.
38.
Pasechnik V. V. Ideya naroda-bogonostsa kak kharakternaya cherta russkoi religioznoi filosofii // Izvestiya Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. 2-1 (78). S. 201203.
39.
Barsov N. I. Vzglyad na zhizn' i deyatel'nost' moskovskogo mitropolita Filareta // Khristianskoe chtenie. 1883. 3-4. S. 472481 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Nikolaj_Barsov/vzgljad-na-zhizn-i-dejatelnost-moskovskogo-mitropolita-filareta/ (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2020).
40.
Filaret (Drozdov V.M.) Tvoreniya. Slova i rechi: v 5 tomakh. M.: Novospasskii monastyr', 2003-2007.
41.
Kuzina L. N., Pigarev K. V. Kommentarii // Stikhotvoreniya. Pis'ma / F. I. Tyutchev. M.: Pravda, 1988. 478,[1] s.
42.
Armată Română în râzboiul de independență 1877-1878 / Cornel I. Scafeş ... [et al.]. Bucuresti: Editura Sigma, 2002. 439 p.
43.
Golovanov S. V. Most mezhdu Vostokom i Zapadom. Ocherk istorii edineniya Kievskoi tserkvi s Apostol'skim Rimskim prestolom. Omsk: Samizdat, 2001. 127 s.
44.
Solzhenitsyn A. I. Dvesti let vmeste (17951995). Ch. I. M.: Russkii put'. 2001. 512 s.
45.
Aksakov K. S. Zapiska O vnutrennem sostoyanii Rossii, predostavlennaya Gosudaryu Imperatoru Aleksandru II // Grebnevskii khram Odintsovskogo blagochiniya Moskovskoi eparkhii Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi, 2019 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.odinblago.ru/aksakov_zapiska (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2020).
46.
Vinogradov V. N. Balkanskaya epopeya knyazya A. M. Gorchakova. M.: Nauka, 2005. 299, [2] s.
47.
Pokrovskii M. N. Russkaya istoriya s drevneishikh vremen. T. 3. M., 1911. 232 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website