Статья 'М. А. Тебетев: социокультурные истоки живописи хантыйского художника ' - журнал 'Человек и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:

M. A. Tebetev: sociocultural origins of painting of the Khanty artist

Galyamov Artur Amirovich

Scientific Associate, Ob-Ugric Institute of Applied Research and Development

628001, Russia, Khmao-Yugry avtonomnyi okrug, g. Khanty-Mansiisk, ul. Mira, 14A

galyamov-artur@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Ershov Mikhail Fedorovich

PhD in History

Leading Scientific Associate, Ob-Ugric Institute of Applied Research and Development

628001, Russia, Khanty-Mansiiskii avtonomnyi okrug, g. Khanty-Mansiisk, ul. Mira, 14A

mfershov@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2020.5.32286

Review date:

27-02-2020


Publish date:

26-10-2020


Abstract.

The subject of this research is the works of the unique Khanty artist Mitrofan Alekseevich Tebetev (1924-2011), viewed from the perspective of its sociocultural origins. The artistic path of the artist took place at the intersection of two intertwined cultures: patriarchal culture of the Ob Ugrians and the culture of Soviet official circles. M. A. Tebetev quite organically infused both cultures. It may seem that his visual art is characterized by propensity for the naive style. However, such assessment in many ways devaluates analysis of the content of artist's paintings. Therefore, certain alienation from the excessive narrow-focus art discourse can propel the analysis of his works to a different, general cultural level. The crucial role in this research is played by the works of such theoreticians as P. Tillich, Dvořák, A. Hauser, and V. N. Prokofiev, which outlined the theoretical and methodological framework for this article. The sources for this research became the works of M. A. Tebetev, exhibition catalogues, and reproductions of his paintings, as well as writings dedicated to his works. The main conclusion consists in the thesis that the works Of M. A. Tebetev feature the attributes of visual historical-ethnographic sources. The evolution of Russian painting from photographic accuracy towards latent iconographic simplicity and open archetypical paganism reflects profound changes in the worldview of the late XX – early XXI centuries.

Keywords: Raishev, sociocultural analysis, Khanty, ethnos, Tebetev, traditional culture, art form, naive painting, Soviet officialdom, sociocultural inversion
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Dvorzhak M. Istoriya iskusstva kak istoriya dukha. – SPb: Gumanitarnoe agentstvo «Akademicheskii proekt», 2001. – 336 s.
2.
Ionov I. N. Rossiiskaya tsivilizatsiya, IX-nachalo XX veka. – M.: Prosveshchenie, 2001. – 319 c.
3.
Ionin L. G. Sotsiologiya kul'tury: ucheb. posobie. – M.: VShE, 2004. – 427 s.
4.
Lifshits Mikh. Chto takoe klassika? – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Iskusstvo XXI vek», 2004. – 512 s.
5.
Prokof'ev V. N. O trekh urovnyakh khudozhestvennoi kul'tury Novogo i Noveishego vremeni (k probleme primitiva v izobrazitel'nykh iskusstvakh) // Primitiv i ego mesto v khudozhestvennoi kul'ture Novogo i Noveishego vremeni. – M.: Nauka, 1983. – S. 6-28.
6.
Tebetev M. A., Fedorova N. N. Lokhtotkurt. – Tyumen': Tyumenskii dom pechati, 2005. – 112 s.
7.
Tillikh P. Izbrannoe. Teologiya kul'tury. – M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2015. – 352 s.
8.
Hauser A. Soziologie der Kunst. München: Dt. Taschenbuchverl, 1983. XVI. – 823 p.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website