Статья 'Деятельность организации «СОС Расизм» в рамках французской миграционной политики. 1983-1989.' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

The activities of the organization "SOS Racism" in the framework of French migration policy. 1983-1989.

Osipov Evgeny Aleksandrovich

PhD in History

Senior Scientific Associate, Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119334, Russia, Moscow, ul. Leninsky Prospekt 32a, 26

eaossipov@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2022.8.38659

EDN:

VAJNPX

Received:

18-08-2022


Published:

25-08-2022


Abstract: The article analyzes the French state policy on the preservation of national and religious identity in the period from the march for equality and against racism in 1983 to the first scandal with the wearing of religious clothing in a public educational institution in 1989. "SOS Racism" was created in 1984. with the support of the ruling Socialist Party in France at that time and thanks to the attention of the major media, he quickly became the most famous anti-racist organization in France, turning into a symbol of French policy towards migrants of Muslim faith.   The article, based on modern French historiography and memoirs of direct participants in the events, shows that the main activity of "SOS Racism" was aimed at working with university students and lyceum students in order to consolidate left-wing political views among young people to counter the growing popularity of the National Front, and not at improving the lives of migrants in the difficult suburbs of large French cities. Over time, SOS Racism increasingly turned from a public to a political organization, which became especially noticeable during the pre-election campaign before the presidential elections of 1988, when SOS Racism held large-scale events in support of F. Mitterrand. As a result, a power vacuum appeared in the suburbs of large cities, which was quickly filled by Muslim organizations, some of which were radical, fundamentalist in nature and almost all of them existed on foreign money. Thus, the rise in popularity of the Salafists and the Muslim Brotherhood, which began in the 1980s, largely determining the agenda of radical Islam in the modern Fifth Republic, was, among other things, a consequence of the unsuccessful work of the "SOS Racism" with the migrant community of France.


Keywords:

SOS Racism, migrants, France, The Fifth Republic, identity, Islam, March for Equality, radicalism, Mitterrand, suburbs

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

 

Several waves of migration to France from Africa and the Middle East, an increase in crime, an increase in social tension, the gradual spread of Islam in the country, including in radical forms – all this makes up the domestic political agenda of modern France. The search for ways out of the current crisis situation inevitably leads to the study of the genesis of the problem.

Muslim migration to France began relatively recently. At the beginning of the XX century, there were few Muslims in the French metropolis (only 4-5 thousand Algerians) [1, p. 29], but during the First World War their number increased markedly: 170 thousand Algerians and 135 thousand Moroccans were mobilized into the army. During the fighting, about one hundred thousand Muslims were killed or wounded on the French side. Such a significant number of victims demanded retaliatory steps from the French state. It was after the First World War that the first Muslim cemetery was opened in France and the Great Paris Mosque was built [2]. By 1939, 200 thousand Algerians already lived in the metropolis. The largest number of Muslims arrived in France after the Second World War. To restore the economy, the country was in dire need of a large amount of labor. The Algerian direction remained the main one until 1962. By this time, 330 thousand Algerians already lived in the country. Even after Algeria gained independence from France in 1962, Algerian migration still continued. And since the 1960s, the Moroccan trend has also intensified. By 1975, 260 thousand Moroccans already lived in France [1, p. 30].

Already in the 1970s, all the components of the future crisis were clearly visible, but the main events occurred in the 1980s. In the autumn of 1983, in the wake of the growth of racist crimes against migrants (mainly against Arab youth, that is, representatives of the so-called second generation of migrants), the idea of organizing a migrant march on foot across the country arose. The organizers of the action were inspired by the actions of their idol — Martin Luther King, who organized the famous "March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom" in 1963, where he delivered the legendary speech "I have a dream...". Twenty years later, the Arab youth of France organized a march "for equality and against racism." Initially, the idea of a peaceful march did not meet with a positive reaction in the French suburbs. Moreover, on October 15, 1983, when the march began its journey from Marseille to Paris, only 17 people participated in the action, and the press paid almost no attention to it. However, it gradually became more popular and widespread, and on December 3, more than 100 thousand people participated in the march through Paris, and the organizers of the action were received at the Elysee Palace by Francois Mitterrand [3].

The march had far-reaching consequences for the mass public consciousness. It was then that many French people realized that migrant workers, who, as they had been told before, had come to France to work, had not been going anywhere for a long time, moreover, the second generation had grown up, a significant part of which was born in France, graduated from French schools and requires equal treatment. The migration issue began to be called a problem. At its core, the march of 1983 was precisely a social action aimed at drawing public attention to the problems of migrants.

6 years after the march, in 1989, the first scandal occurred at the college of the city of Kray with the wearing of religious clothing in a public educational institution. The famous French philosopher, intellectual Alain Finkelkraut begins his bestseller "Unhappy Identity" with the phrase "It all started in 1989..." [4. p. 25], meaning that then the identity crisis became obvious to everyone. There is a huge difference between the events of 1983 and 1989. In six years, residents of the troubled suburbs of major French cities have gone from a social protest demanding an equal approach to upholding the right to differences. In just six years, the religious factor, barely noticeable in 1983, has become one of the defining factors for the second generation of migrants. It is obvious that such a development of events was caused, among other things, by mistakes in state policy. Paris underestimated the scale of the problem.

One of the most notable manifestations of state policy towards migrants was the creation of a non-governmental organization, but close to the Socialist Party, SOS Racism, which personified state policy on the migration issue at least in the period from 1984 to 1989. The history of "SOS Racism" allows us to see the positive aspects of this policy, but above all those mistakes that were made at that time and which influenced the entire modern history of the Fifth Republic and turned the migration issue into a full-fledged crisis of national and religious identity.

As noted above, the march of 1983 turned out to be a very successful action, the attention of the whole of France was focused on the problems of racism, inequality of rights, discrimination, unemployment and low standard of living in the suburbs of large cities. However, the success of the march did not lead to the creation of a large public organization that would unite the "Bers" ("Bers" in France called the Arabs, so the march on Paris in 1983 went down in history under the name "march of the Bers"). First of all, this was due to significant disagreements within the migrant movement. One of its parts (centered in Lyon) proposed to focus specifically on the problems of the second generation of migrants – the central theme of the march of 1983. Another branch, the Paris branch, advocated a broader nature of the movement in which social aspects would be even more important than the purely migration component. It is clear that the Lyon activists were accused of a "communitarian approach", and the Parisians of stimulating the assimilation of migrants [5, p. 10].  The Parisian part of the "Berov" in December 1984, led by Farida Belgoul, organized another march.

Fewer people participated in it than in 1983, but it was still widely covered in the media. During the new march, a number of incidents occurred that showed an insufficient level of communication between various migrant organizations on the one hand, as well as local authorities and suburban residents on the other hand. Farida Belgoul eventually made a speech in Paris that the rights of migrants are not really protected and that she has become a dissident in her own movement [5, p. 11]. The fact of serious internal disagreements in the migrant environment was obvious.

Another reason that after the march of 1983, the Bers could not create a serious organization was the lack of support from the authorities. The views of the Bers, even of the Parisian trend, were too radical for state structures.

Nevertheless, in October 1984, a large organization, SOS Racism, was nevertheless created, but not by the leaders of the migrant movement, but by young political activists close to the Socialist Party of France. The organization was conceived as anti-racist (that's why this name was chosen), and continuity with the Berov movement and the marches of 1983-1984 was also implied. At the same time, by its composition, "SOS racism" initially did not fit the migrant or anti-racist agenda. Many of those who created it were members of the Socialist Youth Movement or the UNEF student trade union, known for its leftist orientation. Their informal leader was a well-known leftist activist (until 1981 a member of Trotskyist organizations) Julien Drey. Being graduates of prestigious schools, most of the organizers of "SOS Racism" were far from the Berov movement and anti-racist themes, which in the future became one of the main reasons for the hostile attitude of the Arab minority of France to "SOS Racism".

In September 1984, the organizers of "SOS Racism" met with the priest Christian Delorm, the initiator of the march of 1983, and even received his blessing for further activities [5, p.13]. However, relations with the leaders of the Berov movement were initially very difficult for the organization. "SOS Racism" did not participate in the march in December 1984 [6, p. 59-63], where Belgoul and other leaders of the Bers did not want the presence of "SOS Racism" because of the "too political and insufficiently migrant" nature of the organization [5, p. 10], and such a position was quite justified. About the social composition and the almost complete absence of migrants among its leaders has already been mentioned above. The political aspect was even more important. Throughout the existence of SOS Racism, the organization's connection with the Socialist Party was obvious. Moreover, from the very first days of its existence, it was aimed at combating the growing popularity of the National Front led by Jean-Marie Le Pen, which was explained by close ties with the Socialist Party and far-left youth organizations, for which the fight against far-right movements was the main task. For the Bers, the internal political struggle was far from of paramount importance.

Julien Drey recalled in his memoirs that from the very beginning the organizers of "SOS Racism" felt that "it is necessary to play the card of mixing (today they would say "multiculturalism" - E.O.), and not differences, and use symbols" [7, p. 204]. The first such symbol was appointed by the head of the organization Harlem Desir – a black man, a descendant of migrants, a participant in the march of 1983 and a friend of Julien Drey. To this day, the French consider Desir a symbol of the fight against racism. From the very beginning, SOS Racism gave priority to large-scale public actions, symbols that could expand the social base of the movement. The organization organized concerts, distributed badges with its symbols to young people. A few weeks after the official launch of the movement, the slogan of the organization appeared – "Touche pas ? mon pote" ("Don't touch my friend") - which soon became very famous and is still strongly associated in France with a protest against various kinds of discrimination and illegal restriction of rights.

SOS Racism tried to work with movie and television stars, invite them to their events, which increased the number of mentions in the media. For example, the famous French comedian Kolyush participated in one of the concerts "SOS Racism". The leaders of the movement gave priority to working with French students and high school students, which also caused controversy in the migrant environment. On the one hand, the involvement of young people is absolutely the right step and contributes to the expansion of the movement. On the other hand, SOS Racism worked mainly not with young people from difficult suburbs, for whose help it was created, but with French university and lyceum youth. Julien Drey writes in his memoirs that they worked very actively, for example, with the Lyceum of Henry IV in Paris [7, p. 207], one of the most prestigious lyceums in Paris, where, obviously, there were no students from the suburbs. The attraction of film and television stars was also aimed more at French youth in order to expand the electorate of left-wing political forces to fight against the National Front, rather than solving the problems of second-generation migrants. Once again, we emphasize that the internal political struggle for the creators of "SOS racism" was more commonplace than anti-racist activity in its purest form.

The first months for "SOS racism" were difficult. Only a few people attended the two press conferences on the occasion of the organization's creation, on November 22 and December 4, 1984. The creators of "SOS Racism" recall that at that moment they were all very disappointed and seriously thought about closing the project. However, the active distribution of badges with the symbols of the new organization to young people at universities and lyceums gradually bore fruit, more and more people learned about the existence of "SOS Racism" [5, p. 18].

The breakthrough occurred in February 1985 . One of the most famous magazines in France – Nouvelle Observer – devoted an article to "SOS racism", and on the first page of the issue was depicted the logo of the organization – a yellow palm with a black inscription "Touche pas ? mon pote" [8]. In the article "SOS Racism" was presented as a "young, modern and non-political" organization. Author Jacques Juliard wrote in a positive way that "SOS Racism" is "anti–gay". Instead of utopian, dogmatic and ultra-political organizations that emerged during and after May 1968, a pragmatic, concrete and apolitical structure appears, according to historian and columnist Nouvelle Observer [8]. As for apolitical, Jacques Juillard was clearly wrong, but the publication in the Nouvelle Observer brought "SOS Racism" to a whole new level. In the future, from February to December 1985, the press was very active in covering all events related to the activities of "SOS Racism". Namely, the press and television, interested in creating a popular left-wing public organization with a migrant theme, played a key role in the formation of "SOS Racism". The Socialist Party, also interested in consolidating the youth electorate around leftist ideas and in mobilizing young people against the growing National Front, supported "SOS Racism" in creating a positive media background. As a result, SOS Racism, created at the end of 1984 and initially had 50 employees, of whom only 15 worked there on a permanent basis [5, p. 16], during 1985 became the most popular anti-racist organization in France. 

The success of "SOS Racism" was not liked by everyone, especially harsh criticism came from various directions of the fragmented Berov movement. The organizers of "SOS Racism" used the popularity of the ideas of the march of 1983, but created their own organization outside the framework of the Berov movement. Christian Delorme, who initially supported the creation of "SOS racism", in the spring of 1985, in an article in the newspaper "Monde" criticized "SOS Racism", expressing doubts about the independence of the organization from the socialist Party and accusing it of striving to become a hegemon and oust other movements from the anti-racist political field [9]. It should be noted that the discontent of the bers with the growth of popularity did not help them overcome internal contradictions and create their own full-fledged structure. And the further strengthening of the positions of "SOS Racism" led to the fact that some of the leaders of the Bers eventually joined "SOS Racism". So, Kaissa Titu, Malek Butih, Hiatt Bujema, Malik Loon even became vice-presidents of SOS Racism.

The peak of the popularity of "SOS Racism" occurred in the summer of 1987. On August 19, Harlem Desir took part in the television program "Hour of Truth" ("L'heure de verit?"). Many expected him to make rather radical statements about the difficult fate of migrants in France. But Desir mostly talked about the socio-economic factors that lead to the emergence of racism. In general, there was much more social than moral in his speech.  70% of viewers approved of his behavior on the program. Many journalists also noted successful theses from his speech: the fight against illegal immigration, but at the same time efforts to integrate migrants into the legal field and especially their children; the fight against racism, which feeds on poverty, unemployment, degradation of living conditions in the suburbs [5, p. 37-38].

Subsequently, due to the approach of the presidential elections in 1988, "SOS Racism" began to play an increasingly active political role and eventually turned into one of the instruments of Francois Mitterrand's victory over Jacques Chirac. In November 1987, SOS Racism organized a demonstration "against racism and xenophobia, for integration and equality of rights and for the protection of democratic values." The event was attended not by film and television stars, as it was before, but by leading politicians from the Socialist Party: Lionel Jospin, Michel Rocard, Jean-Pierre Chevenman, etc. In the press, such inclusion of the organization in the political struggle did not meet with a positive response.

Harlem Desir's performance in the "Hour of Truth", thus, can be considered the highest point in the development of "SOS Racism", and the demonstration on November 29, 1987 is already the beginning of sunset [5, p. 40]. In the future, "SOS Racism" will increasingly be accused of prioritizing political goals over the actual fight against racism, and the leaders of the organization themselves have already linked their political future with the Socialist Party. The culmination of this process will be the appointment of Harlem Desir in 2012 as the first secretary of the party.

In 1988-1989, "SOS Racism" continued to organize events, a rally in Paris in 1988 gathered about 300 thousand people, which was an absolute success, but the press showed less and less interest in covering such events [5, p. 48], and, as mentioned above, it was the attention of the press that turned "SOS Racism" to the largest anti-racist organization in the country. There were also problems in relations with local activists of the migrant movement, who were dissatisfied with the organization's too moderate position on key issues and high involvement in the internal political struggle.

The events of 1989 at the college of the city of Kray (the first scandal involving the wearing of religious clothing in a public educational institution) became a serious challenge for the "SOS Racism". The organization initially advocated the fullest possible integration, if not assimilation, of French Muslims into French society. The scandal in the city of Kray meant the failure of such a policy and once again emphasized that "SOS Racism" did not control the situation in the suburbs and was in fact disconnected from the real migrant agenda.

It is no coincidence that already in December 1989 the French government created a new body – the Supreme Council for Integration, which was supposed to develop French policy in the field of preserving national and religious identity. SOS Racism has not just gradually lost its status as the most influential anti-racist organization, in fact, the attempt of the Socialist Party to turn SOS Racism into a public policy conductor has led to much more serious consequences. We are talking about a significant increase in the influence of Islamic organizations, including radical and fundamentalist ones, on French Muslims, which was not properly taken into account in the activities of the "SOS Racism" and the policy of the French socialists in the 1980s. "SOS Racism" mainly operated in the public, media field, in the difficult suburbs themselves there is little about it who knew.

Despite the success of the Berov movement in 1983-1984, the living conditions of migrants in France continued to deteriorate in subsequent years. The growth of unemployment, the low level of education, the increase in problems with youth crime led to an aggravation of the situation. The authorities actually withdrew from solving the problems of migrants, a vacuum arose in the suburbs, which was actively filled by the activities of Muslim organizations, many of which were radical, and almost all of them were funded from foreign countries. The oil shock in the early 1970s and the sharp rise in oil prices led to the fact that some Arab countries, primarily Saudi Arabia, were able to finance the development of Islam in Europe. The Iranian Revolution of 1979 gave another powerful impetus to the Islamic movement in Europe – Arab youth in European countries realized that it was possible to fight the global dominance of Western values.

Various Islamic centers were actively opened in Europe. Back in 1969, the Islamic Cultural Center of Belgium was opened in Brussels with the money of Riyadh, with the activities of which the spread of Salafism in Europe began [10, p. 31]. In 1977, the World Islamic League began its work in Paris, which in the future will control a significant part of the places of Islamic worship in France [11, p. 63]. In 1980, the Regional European Council of the Supreme Council of Mosques opened in Brussels, and in 1982, the Islamic Institute for the Training of Preachers and Imams in Europe also appeared there.

In the 1980s, the second generation of migrants was re-islamized in European countries, primarily in France and Belgium. The children of their parents who came to Europe ended up being much more religious than their parents. This was directly connected with the ineffective policy of the authorities to solve the problems of the migrant community and, on the contrary, with the active activity of religious organizations. Islam turned out to be the unifying and socializing force [11, p. 171-172] that helped French Muslims integrate into European society, and often it was about Islamic communitarianism, that is, the creation of Muslim communities on the territory of European countries that lived by their own rules, created an Islamic society in Europe. It is no coincidence that Gilles Kepel, a leading French expert on the Islamic question, spoke in 1987 about the emergence of French Islam [11, p. 9] and that its role within France would only grow.

The emergence of the Muslim community, and hence the final failure of the policy of assimilation of migrants, became especially noticeable in 1989. As ten years earlier, Iran's spiritual leader Khomeini again played a significant role. In February 1989, he issued a fatwa calling for the murder of the famous British writer of Indian origin Salman Rushdie, author of the novel "Satanic Verses". This event has become one of the key events in the history of the development of Islam in France. It was then that the French began to wonder which side the Muslim community was on, how much influence Iran and other states had on French Muslims and what it threatened France with in the future. On television, performances were shown in the suburbs of Arab youth who were ready to implement Khomeini's fatwa. Recently, in August 2022, Rushdie was assassinated in New York.

The consequence of the "Rushdie case" was just the hijab scandal at the college of the city of Kray. As for the reaction of the authorities, for the left-wing political forces in France, including the "SOS Racism", the migration problem was still socio-economic, not religious in nature. As a result, time was lost, and French Muslims were forced to live under the influence of radical religious groups, which significantly affected the development of modern French Islam.

 

 

 

References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Among the events of the last decades, which are changing the daily life of Europe before our eyes, demographic changes cannot be overlooked. Indeed, as a result of migration processes, the ethnic and confessional panorama of old Europe is changing. It is no coincidence that in Europe there is a separate growth of right-wing parties calling for tougher migration policy: the Movement for a Better Hungary, the Freedom Party (Netherlands), Freedom and Law and Order (Poland), the National Democratic Party of Germany, etc. According to some forecasts of experts, by the middle of the XXI century. Europe may turn into a continent with an Islamic majority. In this regard, it is of interest to study the reaction of European society to migration crises and the problem of interaction with migrants. These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which is the activities of the organization "SOS Racism" within the framework of the French state migration policy. The author sets out to analyze the positive aspects of this policy, as well as to show "those mistakes that were made at that time and which influenced the entire modern history of the Fifth Republic and turned the migration issue into a full-fledged crisis of national and religious identity." The chronological framework of the study covers the period from 1983 to 1989, that is, the time of a sharp increase in the religious issue in France. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is the historical and genetic method, which, according to academician I.D. Kovalchenko, is based on "the consistent disclosure of the properties, functions and changes of the studied reality in the process of its historical movement, which allows us to get as close as possible to reproducing the real history of the object." The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author seeks to characterize the activities of the organization "SOS Racism" in the context of the formation of a stable Muslim minority in French society. Considering the bibliographic list of the article as a positive point, its versatility should be noted: in total, the list of references includes 11 different sources and studies. From the sources attracted by the author, we will point to the materials of the periodical press (Nouvel Observateur, Le Monde). Of the studies used, we note the works of N.N. Dyakov and E.A. Osipova, whose focus is on various aspects of the Islamic factor in French society. Note that the bibliography is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text of the article, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to a scientific one, at the same time understandable not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to anyone interested in both the modern history of France in general and the Islamic factor in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. At the beginning, the author defines the relevance of the topic, shows that "several waves of migration to France from Africa and the Middle East, an increase in crime, an increase in social tension, the gradual spread of Islam in the country, including in radical forms – all this makes up the domestic political agenda of modern France." Next, the author shows the history of Muslim emigration to France, and also analyzes the circumstances of the birth of the organization "SOS Racism". As the author of the reviewed article notes, "being graduates of prestigious schools, most of the organizers of SOS Racism were far from the Berov movement and anti-racist themes, which in the future became one of the main reasons for the hostile attitude of the Arab minority of France to SOS Racism: in fact, "the internal political struggle for the creators of SOS Racism was more familiar It is more important than anti-racist activity in its purest form." The main conclusion of the article is that "for the left-wing political forces in France, including the "SOS Racism", the migration problem was still socio-economic, not religious in nature. As a result, time was lost, and French Muslims were forced to live under the influence of radical religious groups, which significantly affected the development of modern French Islam." The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, will arouse readers' interest, and its materials can be used both in educational courses and within the framework of confessional research. In general, in our opinion, the article can be recommended for publication in the journal Genesis: Historical Research.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.