Статья 'Многоуровневые открытые городские пространства: современные тенденции ' - журнал 'Урбанистика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Urban Studies
Reference:

Multilevel open urban spaces: current trends

Fomina Elina Vladislavovna

ORCID: 0000-0002-4011-0998

PhD in Art History

Associate Professor of the Department of Design and Art, Volga State University of Service

445017, Russia, Samarskaya oblast', g. Tol'yatti, ul. Gagarina, 4

fomina2004@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Barsukova Natalia Ivanovna

ORCID: 0000-0001-9222-4885

Doctor of Art History

Professor, National Institute of Design

115054, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Dubininskaya, 17, str. 2

bars_natali@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2310-8673.2022.4.38355

EDN:

PFDIDI

Received:

29-06-2022


Published:

30-12-2022


Abstract: The object of the study is multilevel open urban spaces. The subject of this study is the general principles and design techniques of the organization of the subject–spatial environment of multilevel spaces. The article analyzes and systematizes a large project material devoted to new global trends in the organization of multi-level open public spaces. For the first time, a comprehensive overview of their conceptual varieties and compositional features is given. Design techniques aimed at the formation of multilevelness in the urban environment using landscape and design methods of shaping are revealed. A systematic analysis of the principles of the organization of multilevel open spaces in the unity of axiological, ecological, artistic, aesthetic and contextual approaches is carried out. The article identifies current trends in the organization of open multi–level urban spaces, defines them as separate fragments of a transportless urban environment, representing one or more tiers, at least one of which is above ground or water level, intended, as a rule, for recreation and walking. Among them there can be both monofunctional and multifunctional spaces, but they are all united by such qualities as recreational function, accessibility and openness. Typological types are proposed for the first time: multi-level pedestrian zones and additional levels of transport interchanges; tiered gardens and parks; above-water recreational spaces; mini-courtyards integrated into a multi-storey building; green roofs for various purposes; multi-level playgrounds. The conclusion is formulated that the design of multilevel open urban spaces is an actual trend of modern project culture and helps to solve various project and social tasks.


Keywords:

design of open spaces, comfortable urban environment, multi-level open spaces, multi-level pedestrian zones, tiered parks, above-water recreational spaces, green roofs, multi-level playgrounds, linear parks, multifunctional open spaces

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The creation of comfortable recreation areas within the city is an urgent topic for many scientific and applied disciplines: urban studies, architecture, ecology and psychology, etc. The study of open urban spaces is carried out in this article from the perspective of design installations of environmental design. It should be noted that the methodology of environmental design is based on the originality of the concept, environmental friendliness, accessibility for all groups of the population, safety [1]. The perspective of this study is multilevel open urban spaces. The subject of the research is the general principles and design techniques of the organization of the subject-spatial environment of multilevel spaces. The article for the first time systematizes modern trends in the organization of multilevel open urban spaces, identifies the main ways of their formation, gives a comprehensive overview of their conceptual varieties and compositional features.

Open public spaces have a significant potential for transforming the nature of the urban environment. They are public areas, free of transport, accessible to residents and visitors of the city, serve for leisure activities, mass events, various types of recreation and the organization of pedestrian flows. "Public space is an important structural element of the urban environment. It took shape at the early stages of the existence of cities and was modified as they developed, performing social, commercial, entertainment, religious, political and other functions" [2]

The expediency of arranging open public spaces in an urbanized environment is due to social processes, one of which is atomization – the separation and disintegration of habitual ties [3]. Public spaces help consolidate the urban community. It is also important to preserve cultural codes in the urban environment, to create original fragments with local or national identity [4]. The problems of updating and optimizing the open spaces of cities are also relevant [5]. To do this, it is enough to place art objects with gaming capabilities that perform the functions of a natural environment on open areas [6].

Varieties of open urban spaces can be squares, playgrounds and squares, pedestrian zones [7, 8, 9], linear parks, etc. [10]. The design of multi-level spaces is becoming a noticeable phenomenon of architectural and design practice around the world. In different countries, the idea of organizing multi-level spaces has manifested itself in various forms, which have received names: aboveground pedestrian paths, tunnel systems, underground pedestrian systems (UPS), climate-controlled pedestrian paths, inner city, multi-level networks or vertical, integrated environments and even a parallel city [11, 12].

Since much attention is paid to the landscape in the city as one of the main factors in creating an eco-environment and multifunctional public spaces [13, 14], multilevelness as a compositional technique is used in landscape spaces of citywide significance (park, square) and local level territories (courtyards in residential quarters). It should be noted that the organization of multi-level multifunctional structures corresponds to the concept of a vertical city, characterized by viability and autonomy [15].

One of the manifestations of the ongoing transformations of urban public spaces is multilevel pedestrian urbanism, in particular, the spread of multilevel pedestrian systems integrated into architectural structures, raised or buried from street level pedestrian sections (GSPS) [9, 11].

In our understanding, multilevel open urban spaces are separate fragments of a transportless urban environment, representing one or more tiers, at least one of which is above ground or water level, intended, as a rule, for recreation and walking. Among them there can be both monofunctional and multifunctional spaces, but they are all united by such qualities as recreational function, accessibility and openness. This article focuses on the formation of open level spaces in the urban environment. These can be terraced areas on difficult terrain, pedestrian or walking areas, tiered gardens and parks, multi-level recreational surface structures, etc. Trends and preferences in their organization are revealed for the first time. Studies of multilevel open spaces were conducted on the principle of constructing their spatial structure in relation to the ground level and their functional purpose.  The parameters by which the trends were determined are the spatial solution of the object, its main function (purpose), the features of the location relative to natural or architectural objects.

As a result, all the foreign and domestic examples of multilevel open public spaces analyzed by us were systematized as follows:

- multi-level pedestrian zones and additional levels of transport interchanges; 

- tiered gardens and parks;

- above-water recreational spaces;

- mini-courtyards integrated into a multi-storey building;

- green roofs for various purposes;

- multi-level playgrounds.

As a result of the study, it was revealed that open public spaces that are relevant and in demand for citizens generally meet the following requirements:

- social significance, compliance of the organization of space with social attitudes, the needs of citizens. Public space is a space for communication, activities, various types of recreation;

- environmental friendliness. Thanks to green spaces, the ecological situation in the city is improving: trees, a significant area of green spaces purify the air, protect from dust and noise;

- functionality. Zoning, equipment of territories is designed taking into account current scenarios of behavior of citizens, the interests of different groups of the population are taken into account;

- comfort. Comfort for a modern citizen is a complex concept. Its components are socio-psychological comfort (the environment has qualities that optimize interpersonal and group interaction of people, the environment is safe), sanitary comfort (convenience in terms of health, physical condition), adaptive comfort (an environment that adapts to changing human needs);

- actual aesthetics. Combining architectural heritage, ergonomic forms of modern equipment, new materials, technologies into a holistic environmental composition. The use of organic imagery in projects for this architectural, cultural, natural contexts;

- harmony. Consistent consistency of elements is an important characteristic of the composition of space;

- activity of the centers and peripheries. High-quality comfortable open areas, both in the city center and on its outskirts. The development, integrity of the entire urban environment.

Multi-level pedestrian zones and additional levels of transport interchanges. Pedestrian zones are linear objects of the urban environment. Combining into a multi-level system with public pedestrian areas at ground level and above ground, they become an integral form of urban spaces. For example, in La Villette Park (Paris, France, architect B. Chumi), two-level pedestrian spaces are organized (Fig. 1). At ground level there are bike paths along the embankment, the upper level is a pedestrian zone and an observation deck.

 

 

Fig. 1. Level walking spaces in La Villette Park. URL http://faqindecor.com/dostoprimechatelnosti-parizha-za-chto-stoit-cenit-park-la-villet / Photo by N.I. Barsukova.

 

Spaces of this type are arranged vertically. As a rule, they are designed in a mixed functional environment of public and residential use. A three-level pedestrian space has been organized in Zaryadye Park (Russia, architectural bureau Diller Scofidio + Renfro, 2017). The lower level is a space by the water – for a quiet rest. There are places for sitting and open verandas of the cafe are located here. The second level of the embankment is a space for public transport, separating the park and the embankment, where a zone for walking and cycling is allocated. The third level is an observation deck bridge overhanging the river, which compositionally combines the space of the park with the river.

The same type includes multi-level pedestrian zones on decommissioned, functionally obsolete engineering structures, such as railway tracks, overpasses, bridges. These objects are being repurposed into spaces for the recreation of citizens. The transport environment is giving way to the public environment, and the number of comfortable green spaces in the city is increasing. A qualitatively new life is emerging around the renovated facility: the environment is becoming safer, the area of green spaces is increasing, new infrastructure facilities are emerging. Modernized taking into account the principle of humanization of the environment, the new public areas include extended pedestrian spaces, areas for quiet recreation, venues for concerts.  An example of using an abandoned overpass as a public open space is the walking pedestrian street Seoullo 7017 (Seoul, Korea, MVRDV Bureau, 2017). This well-landscaped space is organized above the city highway (Fig. 2). Seoullo 7017 consists of seventeen pedestrian paths connecting different areas of Seoul, and five thematic zones. Designers have laid down a lot of scenarios for citizens' recreation: contemplation, walks, active games of children, musical performances, etc. All this is provided with variable equipment in the form of podium cylinders, which can be used at their discretion. The overpass is connected by bridges and stairs to infrastructure facilities: hotels, cafes, shops.

 

Fig. 2. The park-pedestrian street Seoullo 7017 is organized on an abandoned overpass. URL https://www.elledecoration.ru/interior/outdoor/renovatsiya-po-koreyski-v-seule-staruyu-estakadu-peredelali-v-peshehodnuyu-zonu/The design of multi-level pedestrian spaces is caused primarily by the need to harmoniously combine zones of various functional purposes.

 

Thus, a highly uncomfortable environment is created with many possible scenarios for the behavior of citizens.

Multi-level pedestrian zones can also include additional pedestrian levels of transport interchanges or other engineering facilities. The design of additional levels of transport interchanges is in line with the idea of creating a barrier-free urban environment for all groups of residents. Due to the additional levels of transport interchanges, priority in the city is given to pedestrians and cyclists. At the same time, transport activity and connectivity of different districts are maintained.

An example of such an organization of space is a pedestrian crossing-a ring bridge in a large shopping district of Shanghai (Lujiazui district, China) (Fig. 3). Thanks to the pedestrian space, you can quickly get to any point of the square where the stock exchange, business centers, shops and cafes are located. The bridge is of considerable size: the height is about six meters, the width is seven meters. This makes it not only a pedestrian zone, but also an observation deck popular with tourists. It offers a view of the panorama of the city and the skyscrapers of the district. Some of the entrances to the bridge are equipped with escalators and elevators, which makes it accessible to all groups of the population.

 

 

Fig. 3. A level pedestrian crossing in Shanghai. URL http://fototelegraf.ru/203631-neobychnyj-peshexodnyj-perexod-v-shanxae.html

 

Thus, the organization of additional levels of transport interchanges makes the transport environment safer, thereby increasing its comfort, preserving the integrity of the space.Tiered gardens and parks are the embodiment of the idea of combining nature and architecture.

Two trends are outlined: the organization of multifunctional terraced areas on complex terrain and the integration of green spaces into architectural objects in order to create vertical or tiered gardens and parks. Respect for nature, the use of terrain as a project resource leads to the creation of extraordinary architectural and landscape solutions for open public spaces. Examples of the use of complex terrain are: Zaryadye Park (Moscow, Russia, Diller Scofidio + Renfro bureau, Hargreaves Associates landscape design, Citymakers urbanists, 2017), "Garden of Cosmic Speculation" (Dumfries, Scotland, authors Charles Jenks, Maggie Cheswick, 1989).

Tiered gardens and parks are a way to increase green areas in conditions of dense development, land shortage, a way to change the harsh urban environment to a friendlier and more comfortable one. Vertical gardens and parks are a system of spaces located on different levels of the building. They are placed on all possible surfaces of buildings: on the roof, protruding terraces, balconies.

One of the striking examples of the organization of tiered parks was the multifunctional complex "1000 trees" (Shanghai, China, Heatherwick Studio bureau, 2021). This project was given the second name "Hanging Gardens of Babylon in Shanghai" (Fig. 4). The buildings of the complex are located between a busy street and a canal. It is from the canal side that the trees are located. On the street side, the buildings are decorated with works of modern painting and graphics. The combination of nature and art made it possible to organically fit the complex into the environmental context. The project "1000 trees" is a building of different storeys, in which apartments and offices have access to their own terrace. The original solution was to use columns from the outside of the building to place containers with planted trees on them. Thanks to this solution, from the canal side, the buildings look like mountains overgrown with dense vegetation. The architects designed a thousand columns, inside each of which there is a watering system. More than 70 different tree species and other plant species were used in the project.

 

Fig. 4. Tiered garden "1000 trees". URL http://www.heatherwick.com/projects/buildings/1000trees/ URL https://www.dezeen.com/2021/12/28/heatherwick-studios-1000-trees-opens-shanghai/Vivid examples of the organization of green spaces arranged vertically are also: Namba Parks terraced park in Osaka

 

(Japan, Bureau Jerde Partnership, 2003), multi-storey forest "Sal?n verde" (Madrid, Spain, Bureau MVRDV, 2021). It can be considered that the organization of tiered gardens and parks is a reaction of architects and designers to the new requirements of citizens to the level of comfort, environmental friendliness, aesthetics of the environment, as well as the increased human need for neighborhood and communication with nature.

Above-water recreational spaces. This trend in the organization of open public spaces is relatively new and differs from recreational areas arranged on river embankments and courtyard local small coastal spaces organized near residential complexes [16]. We are talking, first of all, about the organization of additional public spaces on artificial surface devices, remote level platforms or bridges with recreation areas and viewing platforms.

The reconstruction project of the Kalvebod Bruges embankment (Kal / Kalvebod Waves) (Copenhagen, Denmark, architectural bureau JDS Architects, 2015) is an example of a multi–level recreational space above the water with a variety of different subjects of the behavior of citizens. It consists of two, connected to each other, extensive level platforms above the water, which are located taking into account the movement of the sun and the direction of the wind. The southern part of the embankment is a space with rooms and outdoor areas for various events: festivals, fairs, holidays. The second part of the embankment is a recreational space with a beach and a floating garden. It provides an opportunity for quiet and active recreation by the water in the fresh air, organized areas for swimming and sunbathing, paths for walking and jogging.

The platforms are solved as level linear spaces. Wide, spacious areas above the water are connected by a system of bridges: in terms of the embankment looks like two waves rushing from the shore, and from the water side, the level composition of platforms and bridges resembles an undulating sea.

The organization of the Calvebode Bruges space on several levels above the water made it possible to increase the embankment and create a multifunctional public urban recreational space to improve the health of citizens. It became the center of the lively social life of the city.

 

 

Fig. 5. The Calvebode Bruges embankment is a recreational space above the water. URL http://jdsa.eu/kal/Mini-courtyards integrated into a multi-storey building.

 

The trend is most noticeable in the projects of multifunctional complexes that combine the functions of a public and residential environment. The familiar courtyard is "split" into many sites integrated into the building at different levels. At the same time, pedestrian paths are designed at ground level that connect the complex with nearby objects and territories. As a rule, this type of courtyards is designed in conditions of limited building area and multifunctional environment.

This kind of yards is becoming a common practice. An example of the organization of mini-courtyards at different levels of the building is the project of the multifunctional residential complex Nicolinehus (Aarhus, Denmark, AART bureau, landscape architect Schnherr, completion in 2022). The composition of the buildings of the residential complex is built on the principle of a terraced landscape. The number of floors decreases to the water, which allows residents of all apartments to open a view of the strait. Each terrace is a private space, a well-landscaped mini-courtyard.

Another example of increasing green spaces in the space of a residential complex is the Vista project (London, UK, Scott Brownrigg architectural workshop, ZinCo landscaping, 2018). The complex includes 456 apartments and 1300 sq. m. m of commercial space. Conceptually, Vista is a connecting link between the rigid rectilinear geometry of the district's architecture and the nature of Battersea Park. Streamlined curved shapes, a facade decorated with glass depicting the bark of a London plane tree, a terraced composition of buildings, landscaping of roofs, terraces, adjacent territories – all this creates a highly comfortable urban environment, supports the idea of respect for nature, harmonious existence with it (Fig. 6). The terraces of the building are mini-courtyards, private garden spaces, which are designed as an extension of the park.

 

  

Fig. 6. Terraces – private mini-courtyards in the Vista residential complex. URL https://www.scottbrownrigg.com/work/projects/vista/Such an organization of the environment of multifunctional complexes corresponds to the new, emerging lifestyle of a citizen: everything is at hand, different types of recreation are available within the apartment, communication with nature, the formation of an individual space.

 

Green roofs for various purposes.

The green roofs of public and residential buildings that are operated can also be attributed to multi-level open spaces. An additional level helps to increase the comfort of the environment in conditions of dense urban development. They improve the microclimate, increase the number of recreation areas in the city, and return traditional activities to residents. These outdoor recreation spaces can be both monofunctional and multifunctional and include swimming pools, barbecue areas, golf courses and even areas for agricultural activities. Modern roofing materials allow you to create a green oasis at a height in cities with different natural and climatic conditions.

One of the most ambitious roof landscaping projects was a recreation and walking park organized on 15 Sejong City government buildings (South Korea, 2013) (Fig. 7). The roofs of the buildings are connected by bridges. The concept of the park is based on three principles: scale, tradition and environmental friendliness. The principle of scale follows from the need to create an attraction that attracts the attention of citizens and tourists. The park has a considerable length. The tradition is manifested in the use of local plant species. Three thematic trails pass through the garden: decorative, meadow and steppe. Environmental friendliness is in the use of a layer of soil on the roof, which allows you to maintain a comfortable temperature for the human body all year round in the rooms below, at the same time the costs of air conditioning are reduced. More than one million plants grow on the territory of the park, creating a special favorable microclimate.

 

 

Figure 7. The roof garden of the government complex in Sejong, South Korea. URL https://zhurnalkim.com URL https://redeveloper.ru/articles/sady-semiramidy-xxi-vek.htm

 

The combination of natural and urban (landscape park and architectural structure) – implemented in the Shanghai Greenland Center project (Shanghai, China, Nikken Sekkei Architectural Bureau, 2018). The multifunctional center (office and residential buildings) is located above the metro station. All buildings are united by green terraced roofs, reminiscent of tea plantations in relief. The concept is based on the idea of introducing citizens to traditional agriculture. The project is a kind of urban farm. For this purpose, the Shanghai Greenland Center provides 20 thousand square meters. m of green areas for communication with nature and more than 300 thousand square meters. m for "human activity". Designers call this space a "green valley" or "urban farm".

Modern technologies and materials have made it possible to embody the idea of the harmonious coexistence of natural and artificial, nature and urban environment.

Multi-level playgrounds. The tendency of multilevelness is also evident in the projects of children's playgrounds. Most often, multi-level territories are organized in conditions of complex terrain, dense multi-storey buildings.

The children's playground of the residential complex "Achievement" (Moscow, developer Sminex, the end of 2022) is organized on a complex terrain (Fig. 8). It is part of an extensive landscaped courtyard with an area of 1.7 hectares. The level of the yard territory allowed to create not only a functionally saturated space, but also to solve the problem of noise absorption.

 

 

Fig. 8. Multi-level children's playground. URL https://dom-dostigenie.ru/children/

 

The level composition of playgrounds allows you to create a functionally saturated space, combine green areas and playgrounds with play equipment for children of different ages, organize recreation areas.

Conclusion. So, multilevel composition as a way of organizing an open urban space is used for several reasons:

- use of the environment resource: existing engineering structures, transport facilities, industrial buildings are being repurposed into public spaces for recreation;

- multi-level space is organized on a platform above ground level, usually in a multifunctional environment. Different functional zones are placed on different levels;

- in conditions of dense development, recreation spaces are organized on roofs, open terraces.

In the conditions of historical, dense modern buildings, in the course of modernization and re-profiling of the existing architectural and environmental context, multilevel open spaces contribute to improving the environmental situation and improving the quality of human life. The development of original design solutions in this case gives the nature and architectural context of the area the character of uniqueness, visual diversity. Design-the design of multi-level open urban spaces is an actual direction of modern project culture and helps to solve various project and social tasks.

References
1. Byrne, J., Sipe, N. (2010). Green and open space planning for urban consolidation – A review of the literature and best practice. Urban Research Program. Griffith University Brisbane.
2. Lebedeva, E.V. (2017). Public space of the post-Soviet city: opportunities for the development of sociality and the "crisis of publicity". Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. Vol. XX. No. 1 (89). Pp. 74-92.
3. Barsukova, N.I., Fomina, E.V. (2020). Design of urban spaces as a reaction to the atomization of society. Socio-humanitarian innovations: strategies of fundamental and applied scientific research: mater. of All-Russian Scientific and Practical conf. Orenburg: OSU. Pp. 725-730.
4. Barsukova, N.I. (2018). Cultural codes in the urban environment design. Education. The science. Culture: mat. of international scientific forum. Gzhel: GSU. Pp. 116-119.
5. Barsukova, N., Fomina, E. (2020). Optimization Problems of Open Spaces in Industrial Cities on the Example of Togliatti. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. International Science and Technology Conference «FarEastCon 2019».753(2020) 022060.
6. Protsyuk, M.V., Barsukova, N.I. (2020). Bionic game forms in open urban spaces. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education. No.3 (71).
7. Perkova, M.V., Zaikina, A.S. (2016). Characteristics of open public spaces as structural elements of the urban environment. Bulletin of BSTU named after V. G. Shukhov. No. 7. Pp. 74-77.
8. Barsukova, N.I. (2021). Design of urban pedestrian spaces: questions of typology. Modern Science. № 3-1. Pp. 28-31.
9. Lisina, O.A. (2016). On the question of the formation of urban multilevel pedestrian spaces. Landscape architecture. Modern trends: mat. of XII scientific and practical conference. Nizhny Novgorod: NNGASU. Pp. 32-34.
10. Bergman, A.V. (2019). Some aspects of the analysis of the world experience in creating linear parks. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. Irkutsk: IRNTU. T. 9. No. 3. Pp. 594-605.
11. Havlova, Z. (2018). The Issue of Multilevel Pedestrian Urbanism. Urban research table. URL: https://urbanresearchtable.com/the-issue-of-multilevel-pedestrian-urbanism/
12. Yoos,, J., James, V. (2016). Parallel Cities: The Multilevel Metropolis. (A. Blauvelt, Ed.). Minneapolis: Walker Art Center. 208 p.
13. Nefedov, V.A. (2002). Landscape design and environmental sustainability. S.-Pb.: Polygraphist. 295 p.
14. Barsukova, N.I. (2016). Landscape organization of multifunctional open urban spaces. Innovations in socio-cultural space: mat. of IX international scientific and practical conference. Blagoveshchensk: AmSU. Pp. 58-68.
15. Kamalova, K. V. (2021). Vertical city. Retrospective and the development current stage of urban space multi-tiered structure. Academia. Architecture and Construction. Moscow. No. 1. Pp. 102-109.
16. Fomina, E.V., Barsukova, N.I. (2020). Courtyards near the water. Design Features. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education. No. 2 (70).-16.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The introductory lines leave a slightly ambivalent feeling; on the one hand, this is a genuine introduction to the subject, its preliminary outline, etc. On the other hand, this subject (as well as the remarks themselves) leaves the impression of something ephemeral, affecting urban space in general and in particular; the actual "subject" (in a strictly scientific sense) does not appear in the description (quote offhand): "Modern changes in the urban environment are based on the principle of harmonious coexistence of man, the artificial environment, and nature (firstly, too general; secondly, stylistically flawed). In particular, therefore (What is the connection here?) In open areas, it is important to place bionic forms that perform the functions of a natural environment and art objects with gaming capabilities [3]. " Further, the author continues to introduce the reader to the course in the same conscientious (but still somewhat eclectic) way, characterizing the subject from quite different sides: "One of the varieties of public urban spaces can be (?) various types of pedestrian zones [8, 9] and linear parks [10]. Modern public spaces include various functional zones (how does this statement relate to the previous one?), which, for a conflict-free neighborhood, are placed both on the same and on different levels [7]. "It is difficult to get rid of the idea that preliminary work on the classification of an object with the allocation of essential and secondary in its composition is not It has been carried out, but it is happening before our eyes. Obviously, the maxim should be recognized as accumulating in this regard: "Today, the design of multi-level spaces is becoming a noticeable phenomenon of architectural and design practice around the world. In different countries, this concept (which one? The one described in the previous phrase as a "phenomenon"?) It appeared under different names: aboveground pedestrian paths (are aboveground pedestrian paths really a "concept"?), tunnel systems, underground pedestrian systems (UPS), climate—controlled pedestrian paths, inner urban, multi-level networks or vertical, integrated environments and even a parallel city [11, 12]. " In our opinion taste, we are talking about a certain set of new phenomena that have to be comprehended — and terminological confusion does not contribute to such an enterprise. And it's not that the author takes a fundamentally different position — his thought rather overtakes the text and entails it, transforming it considerably. So, the author expresses something similar to the above in literally the following fragment: "The desire for a multilevel urban environment reflects modern urban trends that are based on the principles of humanization (?; this is a strange conclusion, it is unclear why it is embedded in a fairly obvious statement - a typical example of the free flight of thought) — this is the repurposing of industrial and engineering facilities (that is, is there "this repurposing", etc. - are these examples of the above-mentioned trends? But what is the principle of selecting these examples? How are they related to the mentioned "humanism"?), the functional diversity of open urban areas, the increase in the area of green spaces [13]. " The list gives the impression of being randomly put together; the description is dangerously close to purely empirical attraction of everything somehow related to the subject (multilevel space). The style, structure, content, And further (quite extensive) text characterize the combination of these interacting with a fair amount of visible tension sides: sufficient scientific integrity of descriptions combined with the apparent chaotic logical structure. Here is a typical example (of an intermediate summation): "As a result, all (!?) foreign and domestic examples of multilevel open public spaces analyzed by us were systematized in accordance with trends (what does this last phrase mean?) according to the following parameters: - multi—level pedestrian zones and additional levels of transport interchanges (is this a parameter?); - tiered gardens and parks; - above-water recreational spaces; - mini-courtyards integrated into a multi-storey building; - green roofs for various purposes; - multi-level playgrounds." And again, the author is not all right with terminology and logic. Apparently, in this case, what they represent is the result of the typing carried out, and sets the types of available "multi—level spaces" (what does "green roofs" have to do with it?), but not a list of parameters in connection with the blindly mentioned trends. Conclusions, the interest of the readership, Here are the final lines of the text: "As a result of the study, it was revealed that the design design of multi-level open urban spaces is an actual trend of modern design culture and helps to solve various design and social tasks (such general statements cannot be considered as conclusions; in fact, the presentation began with something like this). In the conditions of historical, dense modern buildings, during the modernization and reprofiling of the existing architectural and environmental context, they (the reviewer did not figure out what this "they" refers to; apparently, "spaces" are not "tasks"; but it is not too correct to leave such puns in place of conclusions) contribute to improve the environmental situation and improve the quality of human life in the city. The development of original design solutions in this case gives the natural and architectural context of the area the character of uniqueness and visual diversity. " All this is a jelly of common words and abstract statements that do not require research. This may give the impression that the text is no good and the reviewer is annoyed by every word in it. This impression is partly false. When and since the author gets to the phenomenology (description of what is happening), the presentation finds solid ground — and, of course, is able to form the subject of interest of a specialist. Alas, the scientific framing of this content looks like a tribute to necessity, without which, by a strange whim, publication is impossible. Obviously, it is not realistic to eliminate this contradiction, but it is desirable to smooth it out — in which connection the author is invited to finalize the text, reducing its scientific "framing" as much as possible, and double-cleaning the remainder (of course, it would be nice to get rid of a number of abstract maxims, especially in terms of conclusions). Conclusion: the work as a whole meets the requirements for scientific presentation, but structurally and logically requires refinement, and is recommended for publication upon its completion. The conclusion of the editor-in-chief dated 06.06.2022: "The author has fully taken into account the comments of the reviewers and corrected the article. The revised article is recommended for publication."
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.