Статья 'Дифференциально-диагностические признаки анаплазмоза животных ' - журнал 'Сельское хозяйство' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial Board > Council of editors > AGRIS
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Agriculture
Reference:

Differential diagnostic signs of anaplasmosis in animals

Blyumenkrants Dmitry Alekseevich

Postgraduate at the Department of Veterinary Medicine, Moscow State University of Food Production

109316, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Talalikhina, 33, aud. 340

Blumenkrantsda@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2453-8809.2018.2.28043

Review date:

16-11-2018


Publish date:

08-01-2019


Abstract: The article studies differential diagnostic signs of anaplasmosis in animals. Currently, in the context of ensuring the stabilization of livestock farming, an important task is to reduce mortality and maintain the high level of animal reproduction. One of the factors causing loss of highly productive farm animals and reducing their reproductive ability is anaplasmosis. Favourable weather and climate conditions and breach or nonobservance of instructions requesting to carry out scheduled veterinary activities lead to wide distribution of the disease which damages the economic industry. Identification of anaplasm on the early stages of the disease is often difficult due to the peculiar form of the pathogen, necessitating the conduct of the most sensitive serological diagnostic methods. The decrease of economic and breeding value leads to compulsory slaughter and culling thus increasing the general economic losses of farms caused by anaplasmosis.The article presents the data about the distribution and differential diagnostic characters of anaplasmosis in animals, based on the analytical review of scientific sources and literature. The author establishes the widespread infestation of farm animals with Anaplasma agents. Chronicity and parasitosis are referred to as the main features of the course of the disease. The prevalence varies from 1.54% to 46.9% regardless of the habitat and the conditions of animal management which indicates the permanent presence of Anaplasma in tongue worms determining the high rates of circulation of the disease agents in farms. The decisive factor in anaplasmosis diagnosis is the positive result of microscopic examination of Romanovsky-Giemsa stained blood smears. Serological methods are essential for Anaplasma species identification. At the same time, one of the most significant tests is the immunofluorescence test.


Keywords: Serological methods, differentiation, revealing, diagnostics, Spread, focality, epizootology, pathogen, carrier, anaplasmosis
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Skornyakova, O.O. Epizootologicheskii monitoring i dinamika sezonnoi vospriimchivosti krupnogo rogatogo skota k babeziozu i anaplazmozu // Epizootologiya, epidemiologiya i monitoring parazitarnykh boleznei. – M.: Kirov, 2016. – S. 34 – 39.
2.
Beisembaev, K. K. Epizootologicheskie osobennosti anaplazmoza krupnogo rogatogo skota i sovershenstvovanie metodov ego diagnostiki, profilaktiki i lecheniya; dis. kand. veterinar, nauk. – Omsk, 2005. – S. 140
3.
Malofeeva, N.A. Anaplazmoz krupnogo rogatogo skota i usovershenstvovanie mer bor'by s nim v usloviyakh Ryazanskoi oblasti; dis. kand. veterinar, nauk. – Moskva, 2007. – S. 155
4.
Logvinov, A.N. Anaplazmoz ovets: rasprostranenie, patomorfologicheskie proyavleniya i profilaktika; dis. kand. veterinar, nauk. – Stavropol', 2016. – S. 127
5.
Liberman, E.L. Osobennosti anaplazmoza i babezioza zhvachnykh zhivotnykh Tyumenskoi oblasti; dis. kand. veterinar, nauk. – Moskva, 2014. – S. 155
6.
Kamolov, N.Sh. Anaplazmoz krupnogo rogatogo skota v Severnom Tadzhikistane pri monoinvazii i v assotsiatsii s babeziozami, teileriozom i mery bor'by s nimi; dis. kand. veterinar, nauk. – Moskva, 2008. – S. 158
7.
Kozlova, N.P. Sovershenstvovanie metodov diagnostiki, profilaktiki i lecheniya pri assotsiativnom anaplazmoze krupnogo rogatogo skota; dis. kand. veterinar, nauk. – Omsk, 2007. – S. 122
8.
Samuilenko, A.Ya. DNK-diagnostika anaplazmoza krupnogo rogatogo skota / Samuilenko A. Ya., Gulyukin M. I., Vasilevich F. I., Koval'chuk S. N., Glazko T. T., Babii A. V., Arkhipov A. V., Kosovskii G. Yu. // Rossiiskii parazitologicheskii zhurnal. – M., 2015. – № 4. – S. 24 – 28.
9.
Teplova, E.I. Kleshch Dermacentor marginatus – osnovnoi perenoschik anaplazmoza ovets v Stavropol'skom krae / E. I. Teplova, N. A. Koshkina, D. V. Churilov // Sb. nauch. tr. – M., Stavropol', 2003. – T. 1. S. 61-65
10.
Gulyukin, M. I. Monitoring epizooticheskoi situatsii po protozoinym kroveparazitarnym boleznyam domashnikh zhivotnykh v Rossiiskoi Federatsii (2007–2012) / Gulyukin M. I., Zablotskii V.T., Belimenko V. V. // Rossiiskii veterinarnyi zhurnal. – M., 2013.-№4. - S.53
11.
Georgiu, Kh. Anaplazmoz krupnogo rogatogo skota / Georgiu Kh., Belimenko V.V. // Rossiiskii veterinarnyi zhurnal. – M., 2015. №1. - S.31
12.
Georgiu, Kh. Sovremennye laboratornye metody diagnostiki anaplazmoza krupnogo rogatogo skota i ovets / Georgiu Kh., Belimenko V. V. // Rossiiskii veterinarnyi zhurnal. – M., 2014. №3. - S.22
13.
Georgiu, Kh. Sravnitel'naya otsenka serologicheskikh testov (RDSK, RNGA i IFA) dlya diagnostiki anaplazmoza rogatogo skota i nuttallioza loshadei; dis. dok. biolog. nauk. – Moskva, 1997. – S. 158
14.
D'yakonov, L.P. K epizootologii anaplazmoza ovets // Parazitologicheskie problemamy respublik Zakavkaz'ya i Severnogo Kavkaza. – M., Makhachkala, 1961. – S. 22-24
15.
Sidorchuk, A. A. Anaplazmoz krupnogo rogatogo skota i ovets / A. A. Sidorchuk, A. A. Glushkov // Veterinariya s.-kh. zhivotnykh: nauch.-prakt. ezhemes. zhurn. – M., 2005.-№ 3. - S. 22-27
16.
Analiticheskii vestnik № 17 (674). O sostoyanii epizooticheskoi obstanovki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i predprinimaemykh protivoepizooticheskikh meropriyatiyakh po nedopushcheniyu massovykh zabolevanii sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh. [Eletronnyi resurs] – rezhim dostupa: http://council.gov.ru/activity/analytics/ - S. 250.
17.
Carelli G., Decaro N., Lorusso A. et al. Detection and quantification of Anaplasma marginale DNA in blood samples of cattle by real-time PCR // Vet. Microbiol. – 2007. – Vol. 124. – P. 107–114
18.
Kocan K. M., de la Fuente J., Blouin E. F. et al. The natural history of Anaplasma marginale // Vet. Parasitol. – 2010. – Vol. 167. – P. 95–107.
19.
Renneker S. Can Anaplasma ovis in small ruminants be neglected any longer? / S Renneker, J Abdo, D.E.A Salih, T Karagenç, H Bilgiç, A Torina, A.G Oliva, J Campos, B Kullmann, J. Ahmed, U Seitzer // Transbound Emerg Dis. – 2013. – Vol. 60. – P .105-112
20.
Jifei Y. Molecular detection and characterization of Anaplasma spp. in sheep and cattle from Xinjiang, northwest China / Y Jifei, L Youquan, L Zhijie, L Junlong, N Qingli, R Qiaoyun, C Ze, G Guiquan, L Jianxun, Y Hong // Parasit Vectors. – 2015. – Vol. 8(108) – P. 3–6. Published online. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0727-3
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website