Статья 'Модель Я-концепции как процесса оценки опыта' - журнал 'Психолог' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychologist
Reference:

The Self-concept model as experience evaluation process

Lutsik Maksim Yur'evich

Postgraduate student, the department of General Psychology, Saint Petersburg State University

614000, Russia, Permskii krai, g. Perm', ul. Borchaninova, 7, kv. 2

aumi123@yandex.ru
Drongo Anna Vladimirovna

Student, the department of General and Clinical Pscyhology, Perm State National Research University

614000, Russia, Permskii krai, g. Perm', ul. Nikolaya Ostrovskogo, 93, kv. 404

annadr99@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8701.2021.4.35464

Review date:

09-04-2021


Publish date:

15-09-2021


Abstract: This article substantiates the relevance of studying the Self-concept as a phenomenon aimed at achieving Self-actualization and structurization of behavior. The question is raised about the prerequisites that allow a person to differentiate experience, thereby underlining the need to study the ontogenesis of the Self-concept as the foundation for the evaluative process that integrates the three gradually forming layers. This serves as the basis for formulating the definition of the Self-concept, and describing each of its layers (organismic, social, and conceptual). Their role in the experience evaluation process, as well as applicable to behavior, is explored. The boundaries are established between the layers and the phenomena introduced by K. Rogers; thus, the social layer is naturally introjective and essential. The subject of this research is the determination of each layer of possible disorders within ontogenesis, and relative to this, the risk of transition of the Self-concept from the process to the newly formed structure. Description is given to possibilities of application of this model in psychological practice. Firstly, it allows understanding the incongruity of the customer, as well as self-image of the psychologist in their non-empathic, but congruent responses. Secondly, this model structures the interaction in psychotherapy, helping to establish the typology of psychological disorder, as well as choose appropriate interventions remaining within the framework of humanistic methodology, without eclectic selection of the techniques. In conclusion, the authors reveal the potential of scientific study of the Self-concept model, which consists in understanding the customer and their incongruity. This model contributes to most accurate choice of techniques and methods, as well as means of interaction with the customer, depending on the dysfunction of the layer.


Keywords: conceptual layer, social layer, symbolization, self-actualization, organizational evaluation, humanistic psychology, Self-concept, congruence, experience, psychological counseling
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Abdulin A.G., Tubmasova E.R. Obraz ya kak predmet issledovaniya v zarubezhnoi i otechestvennoi psikhologii Tekst nauchnoi stat'i po spetsial'nosti. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2012. № 6. 4-11 s.
2.
Allakhverdov V. M. Soznanie kak paradoks. (Eksperimental'naya psikhologika) t. 1.SPb: «Izdatel'stvo DNK», 2000. — 528 s.
3.
Arkhireeva T.V. Sistemnyi podkhod k ponimaniyu struktury Ya-kontseptsii i zakonomernostei ee razvitiya v detskom vozraste // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2008. №
4.
S. 48–55. 4.Bek A. Kognitivnaya psikhoterapiya rasstroistv lichnosti. SPb.: Piter, 2002. 544 s.
5.
Binsvanger L. Ekzistentsial'nyi analiz. Per. pod red. S. Rimskogo. M.: Institut Obshchegumanitarnykh Issledovanii. 2014. 272 s.
6.
Binsvanger L., Mei R., Rodzhers K. Tri vzglyada na sluchai Ellen Vest: L.Binsvanger, R.Mei, K.Rodzhers // Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya. 1993. № 3.
7.
Bondarenko O. R. Etiologiya psikhicheskikh narushenii v Klient-tsentrirovannoi terapii // Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa 2012. №1. S. 102-119.
8.
Brezier D. Karl Rodzhers i ego posledovateli: psikhoterapiya na poroge XXI veka. M.: Kogito tsentr. 2005. 315 s.
9.
Budnitskii A.A., Levkova E.A. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniya Ya-kontseptsii // Psikhologiya i pedagogika: metodika i voprosy prakticheskogo primeneniya: monografiya / [avt. kol. : I.A. Vasel'tsova, K.F. Gabdrakhmanova, S.M. Dzidzoeva i dr.]. – Odessa: Kuprienko, 2014. 254 s.
10.
B'yudzhental' Dzh. Iskusstvo psikhoterapevta. SPb.: Piter. 2001. 304 s.
11.
Vygotskii L.S. Analiz znakovykh operatsii u rebenka // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 1997. № 3. S. 5–17.
12.
Golub' O.V. Ya-kontseptsiya kak ekzistentsial'noe yadro lichnosti // Vestnik VolGU. 2012. №1. S. 17-28.
13.
Dzhendlin Yu. Fokusirovanie: novyi psikhoterapevticheskii metod raboty s perezhivaniem. M.: Nezavisimaya firma «Klass». 2002. 400s.
14.
Dzhendlin. T. Yu. Subverbal'naya kommunikatsiya i ekspressivnost' terapevta: tendentsii razvitiya kliento-tsentrirovannoi psikhoterapii // Psikhologicheskoe konsul'tirovanie i psikhoterapiya: Khrestomatiya. T. 1. Teoriya i metodologiya M.: Moskovskii psikhoterapevticheskii zhurnal, 1998. S. 185—200.
15.
Dortsen E. V. Prakticheskoe ekzistentsial'noe konsul'tirovanie i psikhoterapiya. M.: Assotsiatsiya ekzistentsial'nogo konsul'tirovaniya, 2007. 216 s.
16.
Kelvin S. Gardner Kh. Teorii lichnosti. Per. I.B.Grinshpun M.: "KSP+", 2005. 672 s.
17.
Kernberg O. Tyazhelye lichnostnye rasstroistva: strategii psikhoterapii / / M.: Nezavisimaya firma “Klass”, 2005. 612 s.
18.
Lakan Zh. Iznanka psikhoanaliza. Kniga 17. M.: Logos, 2008. 301 s.
19.
Lakan Zh. Instantsiya bukvy v bessoznatel'nom ili sud'ba razuma posle Freida. M.: Logos, 1997. 184 s.
20.
Lengle A. Person. Ekzistentsial'no-analiticheskaya teoriya lichnosti. M: Genezis. 2009. 162 s.
21.
Leing R.D. Raskolotoe «Ya». SPb. : Belyi Krolik, 1995. 352 s
22.
Mak-Vil'yams N. Psikhoanaliticheskaya diagnostika: Ponimanie struktury lichnosti v klinicheskom protsesse / M.: Nezavisimaya firma “Klass”, 2001. 480 s.
23.
Malinina E.V. Mekhanizmy psikhicheskoi dezadaptatsii i pogranichnye psikhicheskie rasstroistva /E.V. Malinina,V.V. Kolmogorova, I.V. Zabozlaeva, O.I. Pilyavskaya// Chel, 2015. –78 s.
24.
Moskvichev V.V. Narrativnaya terapiya: realizatsiya praktiki uvazheniya [Elektronnyi resurs] // Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya. 2010. № 5. URL: http://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/ 2010/n5/Moskvichev.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 03.08.2019)
25.
Nel'son-Dzhouns R. Teoriya i praktika konsul'tirovaniya. SPb.: Piter, 2000. 464 s.
26.
Noimann E. Glubinnaya psikhologiya i novaya etika. M.:Akademichesskii proekt. 1999. 612s.
27.
Rodzhers K. Kliento tsentrirovannaya terapiya. M.: Vakler, 1997. 320 s.
28.
Rodzhers K. Konsul'tirovanie i psikhoterapiya. M.: EKSMO-Press, 1999. 512 s.
29.
Russiion R. Uroki frantsuzskogo psikhoanaliza. M:Kogito-tsentr, 2016. 560 s.
30.
Sinchurina M.G. Struktura Ya-kontseptsii: integratsiya nauchnykh predstavlenii // Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal. 2012. №2. S. 115-119.
31.
Tekhke V. Psikhika i ee lechenie. M. Akademicheskii Proekt, 2011. 481s.
32.
Uiller G. Geshtal't-terapiya postmoderna. M: Smysl; 2015 – 281 s.
33.
Frolov A.A Issledovanie Ya-kontseptsii v razlichnykh teoreticheskikh podkhodakh. Vestnik krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015. № 4. S 287-292.
34.
Edinger E. Ego i arkhetip / Perevod V. Zelenskii. M:Kastaliya, 2015. 316s.
35.
Biermann-Ratjen, Eva-Maria. Weitere Anwendungsbereiche von Gesprächspsychotherapie und konzeptuelle Weiterentwicklungen // Gesprächspsychotherapie. 2012. P. 311-319 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28650-6_13
36.
Bordin E. Is Client Centered Theory Sufficient // The Counseling Psychologist. 1969. 1(2). P. 43-45.
37.
Esser U., Pabst H., Speierer G.-W: (Eds.): The power of the person-centered approach // Koln, GwG, 1996, P. 65-80.
38.
Fink B. A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique // Harvard University Press, 1999. 318p
39.
Finke, J. Empathie und Interaktion. Methodik und Praxis der Gesprächspsychotherapie. Stuttgart: Thieme. 1994. 178 p.
40.
Gendlin, E.T. & G. Lietaer. On client-centered and experiential psychotherapy: an interview with Eugene Gendlin // Proceedings of the 1st European conference on psychotherapy research, Trier, 1981, Vol. 2, P. 77-104.
41.
Gendlin, E.T. Therapeutic procedures with schizophrenic patients. In M. Hammer (Ed.) // The theory and practice of psychotherapy with specific disorders. 1972. R. 333-375.
42.
Greenberg, L.S., Rice, L.N. & Elliot, R. Facilitating Emotional Change. The moment-by moment-process. New York: Guilford Press. 1996. 346 p.
43.
Rogers, C. R. A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In: Koch, S. (Ed.) // Psychology. A study of a science. 1959. Vol. III: R. 184–256.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website