по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychologist
Reference:

Peculiarities of Attention that Influence Successful Acquisition of Sign Language Skills by Hearing Adults
Yasin Miroslav Ivanovich

PhD in Sociology

associate professor of the Psychological Department at Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

117997, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, per. Stremyannyi, 36, of. kafedra Psikhologii

nadsaw@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Vinogradova Valeriya L'vovna

Master of Science at School of Psychology at University of East Anglia

NR1–NR16, Velikobritaniya, g. Norwich, ul. Norwich Research Park, NR4 7TJ, of. NR4 7TJ

vinogradova.valerie@yandex.ru

Abstract.

Learning new languages actively leverages cognitive skills. This is a two-way process since learning affects cognitive functions and learning success depends on cognitive abilities and skills. The sign language of the deaf is a special language, as it unfolds in visual and kinesthetic modalities that are unusual for hearing people. The aim of the work was to study the features of attention, which play a key role in the successful acquisition of sign language by adults with normal hearing. The identified factors can play a predictive role in determining the ability to learn sign language. To achieve the goal, the authors set up an experiment in which volunteers studied sign language. The authors also made three series of measurements, before, during and after training. With the help of a number of techniques, the following components were fixed: unidirectional attention, differentiated attention and attention in terms of interference. The experiment was supplemented by comparative data of the deaf and hearing subjects on the parameter of attention. The study showed that the difference between unidirectional and differentiated attention in a group of deaf respondents is less than in a group of hearing respondents. The gap between unidirectional and differentiated attention is rapidly narrowing in the course of language learning. Initially, it is less for students with good sign language abilities. For mastering the sign language, the key factor is the speed of differentiated attention which can serve as a good prognostic factor. 

Keywords: psycholinguistics, experimental psychology, divided attention, sustained attention, attention, cognitive process, sign language translators, deaf, reaction rate, comparative cognitive science

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8701.2018.4.27194

Article was received:

21-08-2018


Review date:

21-08-2018


Publish date:

24-09-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bartolotti J., Bradley K., Hernandez A. E., Marian V. Neural signatures of second language learning and control // Neuropsychologia. 2017. Vol. 98. P. 130–138.
2.
Bates E., Dick F. Language, gesture, and the developing brain // Developmental Psychobiology. 2002. Vol. 40. P. 293–310. DOI: 10.1002/dev.10034
3.
Bavelier D., Dye M. W. G., Hauser P.C. Do deaf individuals see better? // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006. Vol. 10 (No.11). R. 512-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006
4.
Campbell R., Woll B., Sign, language and gesture in the brain: Some comments // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017. Vol. 40. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15002848
5.
Capirci O., Cattani A., Rossini P., Volterra V. Teaching sign language to hearing children as a possible factor in cognitive enhancement // Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 1998. Vol. 3. P. 135–142.
6.
Codina C., Buckley D., Port M., Pascalis O. Deaf and hearing children: a comparison of peripheral vision development // Developmental Science. 2010. Vol. 14. P. 1-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01017.x
7.
Emmorey K., Damasio H., McCullough S., Grabowski T., Ponto L.L., Hichwa R.D., Bellugi U. Neural systems underlying spatial language in American Sign Language // NeuroImage. 2002. Vol. 17. P. 812-824.
8.
Emmorey K., Kosslyn S. M., Bellugi U. Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers // Cognition. 1993. Vol. 46. P. 139–181.
9.
Hauser P. C, Cohen J., Dye M. W., Bavelier M. Visual Constructive and Visual-Motor Skills in Deaf Native Signers // Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2007. Vol. 12 (2) P. 148-57. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enl030
10.
Keehner, M., Gathercole, S. E. (2007). Cognitive adaptations arising from non-native experience of sign language in hearing adults // Memory and cognition. Vol. 35 (4). P. 752-761.
11.
McKee D. E. An analysis of specialized cognitive functions in deaf and hearing signers // Dissertation Abstracts International. 1988. Vol. 49. P. 768.
12.
Melvin S. The Effects of Learning American Sign Language on College Students. Spatial Cognition, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut. 2013. 64 p.
13.
Parasnis I., Samar V. J., Berent G. P. Deaf adults without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder display reduced perceptual sensitivity and elevated impulsivity on the Test of Variables of Attention (T.O.V.A.) // Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. 2003. Vol. 46 (5) P. 1166–1183.
14.
Pyers J., Shusterman A., Senghas A., Spelke E.S., Emmorey K. Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010. Vol. 107 (27). P. 12116-12120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0914044107
15.
Rothpletz A., Ashmead D., Tharpe A. M., Responses to Targets in the Visual Periphery in Deaf and Normal-Hearing Adults //, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2004. Vol. 46 (6). P. 1378-1386. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388
16.
Sladen D.P., Tharpe A. M., Ashmead D. H., Grantham W., Chun M. M. Visual attention in deaf and normal hearing adults: effects of stimulus compatibility // Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 2005. Vol. 48. P. 1529–1537.
17.
Stone C., Sign language interpreter aptitude: The trials and tribulations of a longitudinal study // The International Journal for Translation and Interpreting Research. 2017. Vol. 9 (No 1). P. 72-87. DOI: 10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a06
18.
Talbot K. F., Haude R.H. The relation between sign language skill and spatial visualization ability: Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects // Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1993. Vol. 77. P. 1387-1391.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website