Траектория утопического: от должного к сущему

Леонтьев Глеб Дмитриевич

doi:10.7256/2409-7144.2017.4.22751


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Sociodynamics

Reference:

Leontyev G.D. — Trajectory of the utopic: from obligatory to essential // Sociodynamics. – 2017. – № 4. – P. 126 - 136. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2017.4.22751 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=22751

Trajectory of the utopic: from obligatory to essential

Leontyev Gleb Dmitrievich

Senior Educator, the department of General philosophy, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University; the department of Philosophy and History of science, Kazan National Research Technological University

420008, Russia, respublika Tatarstan, g. Kazan', ul. Kremlevskaya, 35

leontyeval@icloud.com

Другие публикации этого автора

Abstract.

The phenomenon of the utopic is examined as a universal intention of social and individual being, as the constant of human consciousness. Based on the systemic, structural-functional approach, it is substantiated that the axiological, gnoseological, and project-praxeological foundations of the utopic explain its structure. The elements of structure of the utopic discourse contain the following: utopic ideas, which form in accordance with the “principle of reciprocity” and realized in the ideal; utopic consciousness as manifestation of the dialectics of the recessionary and stabilization social-value consciousness; transformative activity that incites when the ideas become the regulators of social relations and postulate the corresponding norms of mental activity. Such structuredness allows studying the phenomenon of utopia in its integrity and interconnection of the structural elements; in other words, the social intentionality of the “tradition of E. Bloch” is not opposed, but rather intersects with the “tradition of T. More” and practically oriented “line of K. Mannheim”. Analysis of the conceptual orientation of the functions of the utopic consciousness allowed focusing attention of the discursive and normative-regulatory essence of the utopia, the content of which forms through the critical comparison of the social given and the ideal normative, obligatory and essential. The conclusion is made that utopia exists in the social space as an integral discursive-regulatory phenomenon.
Keywords: Social criticism, Obligatory and essential, Regulation, Project, Ideal, Functions, Utopic consciousness, Idea, Discourse, Utopia

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7144.2017.4.22751

Article was received:

21-04-2017

Review date:

21-04-2017

Publish date:

13-05-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Maravall' Kh.A. Utopiya i reformizm // Utopiya i utopicheskoe myshlenie. – M.: Progress, 1991.-S.210-232.
2.	Blokh E. Printsip nadezhdy // Utopiya i utopicheskoe myshlenie: antologiya zarubezhn. lit.: Per. s razn. yaz./Sost., obshch. red. i predisl. V. A. Chalikovoi.-M.: Progress, 1991.-S.49-78
3.	Bloch E. The spirit of Utopia. Standford: Stanford University Press, 2000, rr.320.
4.	Mangeim K. Ideologiya i utopiya // Utopiya i utopicheskoe myshlenie. M.: Progress, 1991.-S.113-169.
5.	Harvey D. Spaces of hope. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000, rr.293.
6.	Uchaikina N.I. Utopicheskoe soznanie kak sotsiokul'turnyi fenomen v russkoi istoriosofii: Avtoref.diss... doktora filosof.nauk: 09.00.11.-Saransk, 2002.
7.	Ssheler M. Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. Darmstadt: Otto Reichl Verlag, 1928. – URL: http://www.max-scheler.spb.ru/content/view/63/37/
8.	Lenin V. I. Filosofskie tetradi. Poln.sobr.soch..-M., 1980.-T. 29. 782 s.
9.	Il'enkov E.V. Problema ideala v filosofii // Voprosy filosofii, 1962.-№10.-S. 118-129. URL: http://caute.ru/ilyenkov/texts/vf/ideala.html
10.	Gavrilov E.O. Utopizm i bytie: opyt rekonstruktsii faktorov vzaimovliyaniya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.-Vyp.337, 2010.-S.36-42
11.	Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya: Osnovnye problemy russkoi mysli XIX veka i nachala XX veka. M.: ZAO «Svarog i K»,1997.-541s.
12.	Maslov E.S. Ozhidanie osushchestvleniya sotsial'nogo ideala kak fenomen massovogo soznaniya. Avtoref.diss….kand filos.nauk: 09.00.11.-Kazan', KGU, 2003.
13.	Chertkova E.L. Utopiya kak tip soznaniya // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'.-1993.-№ 3.-S. 71-81.
14.	Chalikova V.A. Utopiya rozhdaetsya iz utopii.-London: Overseas Publications Interchange Ltd, 1992.-URL: http://chalikova.ru/utopiya-rozhdaetsya-iz-utopii.html
15.	Sidorina T.Yu. Filosofiya krizisa.-M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2003. 456s.
16.	Chertkova E.L. Ratsional'nost'-kritika-svoboda // Istoricheskie tipy ratsional'nosti / Otv. red. V.A.Lektorskii.-T.1.-M., 1995. – S.250-264.
17.	Khabermas Yu. Kontsept chelovecheskogo dostoinstva i realisticheskaya utopiya prav cheloveka// Voprosy filosofii.-2012. №2.-S. 66-80.-URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=474
18.	Gouldner, Alvin W. The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. London: Macmillan Press, 1979, rr.121
19.	Panarin A.S. Revansh istorii: rossiiskaya strategicheskaya initsiativa v XXI veke.-M.: Logos, 1998.-392 s.
20.	Kurashov V.I. Vzaimosvyazi nauki, logiki, metodologii nauki i teologii: etap zarozhdeniya // Vestnik KGTU im. A.N.Tupoleva.-2011.-№3. S.131-136
21.	Leont'ev G.D. Invarianty struktury utopicheskogo diskursa // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.-2016.-№ 10 (392). Filosofskie nauki. Vyp. 42.-S. 18–21.
22.	Tuzovskii I.D. Utopiya-XXI: global'nyi proekt «Informatsionnoe obshchestvo».-Chelyabinsk: Chelyab. gos.akad.kul't.i iskusstv, 2014.-389 s.
23.	Palii I.G. Osobennosti rossiiskogo postmodernizma // Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura.-2016.-№ 6.-http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-rossiyskogo-postmodernizma
24.	Skorokhodova T. G. Realizm versus utopizm: sotsial'no-filosofskie razmyshleniya Rabindranata Tagora i Semena Franka // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 92-102.
25.	Gurevich P.S.. Ustranima li ideologiya? // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2016. – № 9. – S. 1235-1238. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.9.20440
26.	Paniotova T.S.. Izobretenie metoda: Un novum instrumentum v "Utopii" Tomasa Mora // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2016. – № 8. – S. 1139-1147. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.8.19867
27.	Belousova N.O.. Problema poraboshcheniya cheloveka «vseobshchim» v zhanre antiutopii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2016. – № 3. – S. 337-340. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.3.17996

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.