DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2014.3.13920

Abstract: The problem of socially dangerous entrenchments criminalization criteria is very urgent for the modern penal science and lawmaking. The development of penal lawmaking conceptual base is of a big importance for the international community, as it determines combating crime effectiveness. As the criteria of criminalization, the author considers theoretical substantiation of social danger of particular actions, which are based on the analysis of law enforcement activity, including the investigative practice. This article considers the existing international standards of the entrenchments on the citizens’ rights criminalization, which determine the grounds of the existing conceptual base of combating crime. The methodology of the research includes the complex of the general scientific and the special methods of the objective social and legal reality understanding in the area of the research: the methods of analysis, synthesis, systematization and generalization, the formal logical method, the statistical and sociological methods. The article studies and analyzes the theoretical and practical grounds, the Russian and international standards of socially dangerous entrenchments criminalization. The findings of the research can be used by the law enforcement bodies, possessing the right of law making initiative, by students, postgraduates, and others interested in jurisprudence. 

DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2014.4.13935

Abstract: The article considers the problems related to use of means of restraint by security forces of the Russian Federation in the light of its commitments in the sphere of use of weapons of war, use of force and firearms by security forces. Security forces are mainly armed with the weapons which are adopted by their states’ armies, i.e. the weapons of war. It is noted that the collective bodies of the international community call the states upon for arming their security forces with the weapons, allowing use of force differentiating and not wounding severely. The methodology of the research is based on the up-to-date achievements of epistemology. The author uses the general philosophical, theoretical, and empirical methods (dialectics, the system approach, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, and modeling), the traditional juridical methods (formal-logical), the methods, which are used in sociological research (the statistical method, expert evaluations, etc.), and others. The analysis of international normative legal acts in the sphere of weapons of war creation and restriction of use, specifically the particular kinds of conventional weapons, and their use by security forces during the performance of their duties, had shown the necessity of further development of normative acts, enhancing the order of creation and use of non-lethal weapons. 

DOI: 10.25136/2409-7810.2022.4.39449

EDN: OQNUBN

Abstract: The article examines the essence of administrative-procedural coercion measures and how attention is drawn to the institution of administrative coercion, the definition of administrative-procedural coercion measures in its content. The paper concludes that procedural measures did not immediately appear in the construction of administrative coercion, this was due to the development of legislation on administrative responsibility, as well as legal doctrine. The problem of administrative coercion has been the subject of scientific attention for a long time. At one time, the research of the institute of administrative coercion even had a pro-Western character, where this coercion was used very widely. The author concludes that administrative and procedural coercion is aimed at suppressing administrative offenses, ensuring the proceedings on administrative offenses, as well as the execution of decisions taken within the framework of this proceeding. The author notes that within the framework of administrative and procedural coercion, coercive and restrictive measures of influence are applied, as well as non-coercive measures that are necessary to ensure the implementation of procedural coercion. Administrative and procedural coercion is aimed at suppressing administrative offenses, ensuring the proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, as well as the execution of decisions taken within the framework of this proceeding. It should be noted that within the framework of administrative and procedural coercion, coercive and restrictive measures of influence are applied, as well as non-coercive measures that are necessary to ensure the implementation of procedural coercion.

DOI: 10.25136/2409-7810.2023.3.43775

EDN: UHMLSO

Abstract: The article discusses the mechanism of administrative coercion, this issue is important from the point of view of the application of various measures of administrative influence. The importance of such a category as the "legal mechanism of administrative coercion" will be predetermined by its functionality in determining methods of coercive influence. The mechanism of application of administrative coercion may make it possible to balance private and public interests in the application of various measures of administrative coercion, as well as to avoid violations of the requirements of legality. The mechanism of administrative coercion is a kind of law enforcement (police) mechanism. Despite this, the mechanism of coercion has its own specifics. The author revealed the features of the mechanism of administrative coercion measures, gave a theoretical analysis of the elements of this mechanism. The paper draws attention to the fact that constructively the mechanism of administrative and legal regulation of the use of coercive measures includes the norms of law, legal relations, acts of application of the norms of law, as well as legal culture. Based on this, the author concludes that the mechanism of action of administrative coercion harmoniously includes both legal and non-legal elements, and the importance of the latter elements is also important for the effectiveness of the implementation of the coercion. The author concluded that the legal culture as an element of the mechanism of administrative coercion has not received a proper theoretical assessment.

DOI: 10.25136/2409-7810.2023.4.48493

EDN: WTLDHC

Abstract: The author considers such a category as "administrative offense". This issue is important from the point of view of the application of administrative responsibility, since it is this illegal act that can be the basis of the corresponding type of legal liability. The paper draws attention to the signs of an administrative offense, special attention is paid to such a sign of an administrative offense as "public danger" and "public harmfulness". After analyzing various points of view, the author came to the conclusion that an administrative offense may have varying degrees of public danger. The importance of such a category as "administrative offense" will be determined by its functionality in countering administrative delicacy. Disclosure of the signs of an administrative offense, and elements of its composition, can make it possible to improve the quality of the process of qualification of administrative offenses. The author also considers such categories as "administrative punishment" and "administrative responsibility" this issue is important from the point of view of the application of administrative coercion in general. Administrative punishment is the most serious measure of influence of an administrative and legal nature, it is administrative penalties that most measures of administrative coercion are subject to. The author noted that the importance of such a category as "administrative punishment" is predetermined by its functionality in countering the commission of administrative offenses. Disclosure of the essence of administrative punishment may make it possible to balance private and public interests in the application of various measures of administrative responsibility, as well as to avoid violations of the requirements of legality and the rights of citizens. The author reveals in great detail the essence of administrative responsibility, namely administrative responsibility is a procedural form for the implementation of administrative penalties.

DOI: 10.25136/2409-7810.2020.3.34140

Abstract:   The research subject is the set of laws regulating the grounds for and the procedure of an external pat-down by the police officers. The research object is social relations emerging during an external pat-down carried out by the police officers for the purpose of public order and safety protection. The article deals with the questions of public order protection by the police officers using an external pat-down. The author considers the problems of legal regulation of this type of search using comparative analysis, and defines the organizational aspects of an external pat-down. The author focuses on the legal grounds for the prevention of citizens’ counteraction to police officers performing an external pat-down. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the complex analysis of an external pat-down carried out by police officers for the purpose of personal safety protection. Based on the analysis of laws and law-enforcement practice, the author defines the tactics of police officers carrying out an external pat-down in situations beyond the scope of legal regulation. The author emphasizes the necessity to strictly observe civil and political rights during an external pat-down. In this context, the author draws attention to the peculiarities of carrying out an external pat-down by a police officer of the same gender as a searched person, and the legality of actions in case the objects, potentially dangerous for the police officers but not prohibited for civilian circulation, are found.  

DOI: 10.25136/2409-7810.2023.1.39676

EDN: GVOTSG

Abstract: The institution of administrative responsibility is one of the key ones in administrative law. However, in order for it to become so, it took quite a long time, the legal support of the institution of administrative responsibility was formed almost throughout the twentieth century. Today, a two-level system of legislation on administrative responsibility has been formed. The modern period of development is simply impossible to imagine without administrative responsibility, the protective properties of which relate to the most diverse spheres of public administration. Based on this, the paper draws attention to legislative and doctrinal provisions related to issues of administrative responsibility. The paper analyzes various doctrinal positions regarding the phenomenon of "administrative responsibility", analyzes its normative basis.   The author notes that the institution of administrative responsibility began to develop actively in the twentieth century, this was caused by the need to separate legal responsibility for offenses that do not pose a great public danger from acts that are of significant public danger. Today we can say that administrative responsibility makes a serious contribution to ensuring law and order, and it is no longer possible to imagine a system of legal responsibility without this type of responsibility. The institution of administrative responsibility, in its content, is a dialectical relationship of norms of a material and procedural nature that complement each other. Based on the analysis, the author gives a definition of administrative responsibility.