по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Excessive inequality of income as a threat to national security of Russia.
Yurevich Andrei Vladislavovich

Doctor of Psychology

Vice-Director, the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russia, 129366, Moskva, ul. Yaroslavskaya, d.13.

yurev@orc.ru
Zhuravlev Anatolii Laktionovich

Doctor of Psychology

Director of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Federation

adm3@psychol.ras.ru
Yurevich Maksim Andreevich

Russian Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in the Scientific and Technical Sphere

105064, Moskva, ul. Zemlyanoi Val, d.50a, str.6.

yurevm@riep.ru

Abstract.

The authors base their study upon the existing economic distinction between normal and excessive inequality in incomes, when the  incomes of the 10% of richest persons are no more than 6-8 times higher than incomes of the 10% of poorest persons.  They establish that the negative influence of excessive inequality of incomes, which is typical for modern Russia, goes far beyond the economics, and it influences various spheres of social life, such as birth and death rate, health of population, murders and suicides, corruption, social and political processes, etc., thus posing a real threat  to the national security of Russia.  In the opinion of the authors the lowering the level of excessive inequality could have a multifaceted positive influence on the modern Russian society, it could improve its social structure, help to overcome poverty, ease the social tension, allow for the growth of the middle class. However, the measures  towards lowering the inequality level are countered by the persons with super-incomes and their ideologists.

Keywords: normal inequality, excessive inequality, social comparison, relative poverty, birth rate, death rate, health of the population, social and political processes, murders, suicides

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0417.2013.2.550

Article was received:

25-03-2019


Review date:

25-03-2019


Publish date:

1-4-2013


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Shevyakov A.Yu. Neravenstvo i formirovanie novoi sotsial'noi politiki gosudarstva // Vestnik RAN. 2008. Tom 78. № 4.S. 304-331.
2.
Shevyakov A.Yu. Sotsial'naya politika i reformirovanie raspredelitel'nykh otnoshenii // Vestnik RAN. 2007. Tom 77. № 3. S. 195-210.
3.
Persson T. and Tabellini G. Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence.// American Economic Review, 1994 Vol. 84.R. 600-621.
4.
Larrain F. and Vergara R. Income Distribution, Investment and Growth. Development Discussion Paper No. 596. Harvard University. August 1997.
5.
Alesina A and Rodrik D. Distributive Politics and Economic Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1994. Vol. 109. No. 2. P. 465-490.
6.
Nadel' S.N. Sotsial'nye faktory ekonomicheskogo rosta // Sotsial'nye istochniki ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. M.: IMEMO RAN, 2005.S. 7-18.
7.
Arjona R., Maxime Ladaique M. and Pearson M. Social Protection and Growth // OECD Economic Studies. 2002. No. 35.
8.
Barro R. Inequality, Growth, and Investment // NBER Working Papers, 1999, № 7038. – 54 r.
9.
Sotsial'nye neravenstva i sotsial'naya politika v sovremennoi Rossii / Pod. Red. M. K. Gorshkova i N. E. Tikhonovoi. M.: Nauka, 2008.- 423 s.
10.
Khashchenko V. A. Tipologiya sub''ektov ekonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2007. T. 28. № 1.S. 58-69
11.
Arieli D. Povedencheskaya ekonomika. M.: «Mann, Ivanov i Ferber», 2013.- 288 s.
12.
Voronin G.L. Ob''ektivnye i sub''ektivnye pokazateli obshchestvennogo blagopoluchiya // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 2009. № 3. S. 41-54.
13.
Khashchenko V. A. Ekonomiko-psikhologicheskaya model' sub''ektivnogo ekonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya (soobshchenie 2) // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2005. T. 26. № 4.C. 5–19.
14.
Rusinova N. L., Safronov V. V. Sotsial'naya stratifikatsiya zdorov'ya v Rossii: tendentsii v 1990-e i 2000-e gg. // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 2012. № 1. S. 29-38.
15.
Sverkhvysokoe neravenstvo – real'naya ugroza stabil'nosti obshchestva. Obsuzhdenie nauchnogo soobshcheniya // Vestnik RAN. 2008. Tom 78. № 4.S. 314-316
16.
Gritsai L. A. Materinstvo i nauka: k voprosu o roditel'skikh ustanovkakh sovremennykh rossiiskikh zhenshchin-uchenykh // Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii. 2011. Tom 2. № 4. S. 99-104.
17.
Popov N. P. Bednost' ne porok? // Vestnik RAN. 2008. Tom 78. № 8. S. 688-692
18.
Rudenko D.Yu. Al'ternativnye podkhody k izmereniyu bednosti v regionakh Rossii // XII Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva. T. 2. M.: Izdatel'skii dom vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2012.S. 589-598
19.
Levashov V. K. Sotsiopoliticheskaya dinamika rossiiskogo obshchestva: 2000-2006. M.: Academia, 2007.- 514 s.
20.
Zarakovskii G.M. Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya Rossii: psikhologicheskie sostavlyayushchie. M.: Smysl, 2009.– 319 s.
21.
Rossiiskii statisticheskii ezhegodnik.2011. M.: Rosstat, 2011.- 795 s.
22.
Lysova A. V., Shchitov N. G. Sistemy reagirovaniya na domashnee nasilie // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 2003. № 3. S.99-115.
23.
Sochivko D.V., Polyanin N.A. Molodezh' Rossii: obrazovatel'nye sistemy, subkul'tury, ispravitel'nye uchrezhdeniya. M.: Moskovskii psikhologo-sotsial'nyi institut, 2009.- 268 s.
24.
Mareeva S. V. Zapros rossiyan na modernizatsiyu i opredelennyi tip sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya strany // XII mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva. Chast' 3. M.: Izdatel'skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2012.
25.
Eletskaya M. A. Otnoshenie sovremennykh rossiyan k bogatstvu i bednosti // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 2009. № 2.S. 82-96
26.
Dondurei D. Bez modernizatsii massovogo soznaniya lyubye sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie preobrazovaniya obrecheny // Mir peremen. 2007. № 2.S. 70-85.
27.
Shkaratan O. I. Gosudarstvennaya sotsial'naya politika i polozhenie srednikh sloev v sovremennoi Rossii // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 2004. № 1/2.S 106-128.
28.
Alle M. Usloviya ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti. M.: Nauka dlya obshchestva, 1998.– 304 s.
29.
Transperancy International. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/in_detail#1 (data obrashcheniya: 19.01. 2012).
30.
Rodríguez F. Inequality, Economic Growth and Economic Performance. A Background Note for the World Development Report 2000. - 14 r. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPOVERTY/Resources/WDR/Background/rodriguez.pdf(data obrashcheniya: 19.01. 2012)
31.
Shkaratan O.I. i kollektiv. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe neravenstvo i ego vosproizvodstvo v sovremennoi Rossii. M.: OLMA Media Grupp. 2009.- 555 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website