по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Ethno Lookism as the Factor that Decreases Psychological Safety of Ethno-Cultural Groups with Different Kinds of Appearance
Labunskaya Vera Aleksandrovna

Doctor of Psychology

professor at Southern Federal University

344006, Russia, g. Rostov-Na-Donu, ul. Bol'shaya Sadovaya, 105/42, kab. Nagibina, 13.-219

vlab@aaanet.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The subject of the research is ethno lookism interpreted as 'everyday' discriminatory practice that involve ethno-cultural groups with peculiar appearance. New aspects of human existence, in particular, 'digital environment', raise a question about psychological safety of an individual when he or she happens to be under the influence of discriminatory behavior caused by the influence of various factors. Thus, the author of the article emphasizes the need to analyze subjective and personality factors that influence the acceptance of ethno lookism and, consequently, on the definition of individual's psychological safety. The author offers the following hypothesis: acceptance or non-acceptance of ethno lookism may be the result of self-evaluations of one's appearance. The methods used by the author include 1)Test to evaluate the acceptance of discriminatory behavior of the Other when ethno-cultural groups are involved; 2) Appearance Self-Evaluation Test. The mathematical procedures included single-factor analysis of variance, T-criteria of paired samples, and Mann–Whitney U test. The research involved 66 young people from 25 to 35 years old, men constituted 36% and women constituted 64%. The main conclusions of the research: 1. The range of ethno lookism acceptance demonstrates that 25% of research participants have a high level of ethno lookism acceptance. These young people may be a threat for psychological safety of particular groups with a singular appearance. 2. The higher self-esteem and self-evaluation of young people towards their appearance are, the more tolerant they are to ethno lookism and the more frequent they determine the level of psychological safety in a group. 

Keywords: young people, type of appearance, gender, self-esteem, subject-personality factors, acceptance, ethno lookism, the observed discrimination, ethno-cultural groups, psychological safety

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7543.2018.6.27853

Article was received:

30-10-2018


Review date:

31-10-2018


Publish date:

01-11-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Al'perovich V.D. Obrazy «svoikh» i «chuzhikh» lyudei, vraga i druga v metaforakh i predstavleniyakh lichnosti// Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya, 2016. T. 4. №7. S. 96-102.
2.
Bzezyan A.A. Lukizm i etnicheskaya diskriminatsiya//Severo-Kavkazskii psikhologicheskii vestnik, 2012. №10/3. S.21-23.
3.
Bzezyan A.A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie osobennosti otnosheniya k diskriminatsii predstavitelei etnicheskikh grupp s razlichnym tipom vneshnego oblika. Avtoreferat dissertatsii kandidata nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2015. 23s.
4.
Labunskaya V.A. Metodologiya issledovaniya vzaimosvyazei otnoshenii, obrazov, form obrashchenii v kontekste mezhetnicheskogo obshcheniya //OT ISTOKOV K SOVREMENNOSTI: 130 let organizatsii psikhologicheskogo obshchestva pri Moskovskom universitete: Sbornik materialov yubileinoi konferentsii. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2015.T.3. S.264-267.
5.
Labunskaya V.A. Ot psikhologii vneshnego oblika A.A. Bodaleva k postroeniyu empiricheskikh modelei izucheniya otnosheniya k etnolukizmu v obydennom obshchenii// Litso cheloveka v prostranstve obshcheniya. M.: Moskovskii institut psikhoanaliza – Kogito – Tsentr, 2016. S.73-97.
6.
Labunskaya V.A., Bzezyan A.A. Osobennosti «Appearance» stereotipov etno-kul'turnykh grupp s razlichnymi tipami vneshnego oblika//Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatel'skii zhurnal uspekhi sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya, 2016. №9, T. 2. S.77-84.
7.
Labunskaya V.A., Bzezyan A.A. Osobennosti diskriminatsionnogo otnosheniya k predstavitelyam etnokul'turnykh grupp: genderno-situatsionnyi analiz / Gendernye realii 21 veka: sbornik nauchnykh statei. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YuFU, 2014. S. 130-134.
8.
Labunskaya V.A., Kapitanova E.V. Samootsenka i otsenka vneshnego oblika chlenov studencheskoi gruppy kak prediktory otnoshenii mezhlichnostnoi znachimosti // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, 2016. T. 7. № 1. S. 72–87.
9.
Labunskaya V. A. Ne yazyk tela, a yazyk dushi! Psikhologiya neverbal'nogo vyrazheniya lichnosti. Rostov na Donu: Feniks, 2009. 344 s.
10.
Maiers D. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. SPb.: Praim-Evroznak, 2002. 512s.
11.
Orekh E.A. Fenomen lukizma i vozmozhnosti ego sotsiologicheskogo analiza / Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, 2016. № 3. S.67-81.
12.
Pogontseva D.V. Vidy diskriminatsii po vneshnemu obliku// Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika, 2013. № 9. S. 858-861.
13.
Pogontseva D.V. Formy proyavleniya etnolukizma (na primere sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovanii)/Lichnost' i bytie: chelovek kak sub''ekt sotsiokul'turnoi real'nosti: materialy Vserossiiskaya nauchno- prakticheskaya konferentsiya. Krasnodar: Kubanskii gosudarstvennyi. Universitet, 2016. S.112-114.
14.
Rasizm, ksenofobiya, diskriminatsiya. Kakimi my ikh uvideli/ Sb. statei; sost. i otv. red. Ekaterina Demintseva. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. 384 s.
15.
Tatarko A.N., Lebedeva N.M. Psikhologiya mezhetnicheskikh otnoshenii. Etnicheskaya identichnost' i strategii mezhkul'turnogo vzaimodeistviya. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2010. 190s.
16.
Shefer B., Skarabis M., Shleder B. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya model' vospriyatiya chuzhogo: identichnost', znanie, ambivalentnost' // Psikhologiya, 2004.№1. S.24–51.
17.
Yarskaya V.N. Yazyk moi - vrag moi: rasistskii diskurs v rossiiskom obshchestve// Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012, № 6. S. 46-53
References (transliterated)
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website