Статья 'Политика двойных стандартов как угроза национальной безопасности Российской Федерации ' - журнал 'Вопросы безопасности' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Security Issues
Reference:

The policy of double standards as a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation

Kovalev Andrei Andreevich

PhD in Politics

Associate Professor at the North-West Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA

199178, Russia, Sankt-Peterburg oblast', g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Srednii Prospekt, V.o., 57/43

senator23@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7543.2017.5.24084

Review date:

04-09-2017


Publish date:

05-11-2017


Abstract: The research subject is the influence of the policy of double standards on the national security of the Russian Federation. The term “policy of double standards” is widely used in the modern political practice. The research purpose is the attempt to estimate the threat of the policy of double standards to the national security of Russia. The author formulates the following research tasks: 1) to ascertain the possibility of precise methodological definition of the “policy of double standards” concept; 2) to offer the author’s definition of the concept; 3) to estimate the role of the policy of double standards in civilizational confrontation; 4) to estimate the role of international law institutions in the implementation of such policy. The research methodology includes the dialectical, historical and logical and historical-comparative methods and the methods of political science (case study, event-analysis, expert assessment). The author finds out that the “double standards” concept can’t be precisely defined due to a wide range of assessments and subjective judgements attributed to this concept; 2) the author offers his own interpretation of the “policy of double standards” concept as an intentionally contradictory and exaggeratedly emotional estimation of one and the same phenomenon of objective reality. The practice of double standards is performed in the situations when the actions of some countries are supported and justified, and the actions of others are condemned and punished, while the essence of these actions is the same. Nowadays, the policy of double standards is the reality of the current civilizational confrontation between the Euro Atlantic and the Eurasian communities. It plays the role of an effective instrument of information, ideological and paradigmatic wars. In the modern epoch of civilizational confrontation, international legal assessment is deliberately subjective. International law becomes an instrument of the policy of double standards. The author concludes that the policy of double standards is an effective instrument of information war of the Western civilization against Russia as a stronghold of the Russian world. This policy is a real threat to Russia’s national security. 


Keywords: history of diplomacy, information war, international law, confrontation of civilizations, double standards, globalization, political science, national security, truth, gnoseology
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Akhmatov A.V. K voprosu o dvoinykh standartakh v politike i prave // Vestnik MGU. Seriya 7 Filosofiya, 2008. №7. S. 85-91.
2.
Bulipopova E.V. Severnaya Koreya kak aziatskii «Prometei»: mifologiya i polittekhnologiya «dvoinogo standarta»// Oikumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya, 2009. №4, S. 89-94.
3.
Bulipopova E.V. Dvoinye standarty: problema i ponyatie v diskursivnom prostranstve sovremennoi politicheskoi teorii // Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2011. №1. S. 112-118.
4.
Bukhanova A.S. Kolliziya printsipov samoopredeleniya narodovˏ territorial'noi tselostnosti gosudarstv i vozmozhnye puti ee resheniya // Pravo i upravlenie: KhKhI vek, 2011. №4(21). S.67-71.
5.
Vereshchagina A.V. "Voina i mir" v usloviyakh novoi sotsial'noi real'nosti (k voprosu o voennoi i natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii) // Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS, 2015. №2. S.178-183.
6.
Vinogradov V. N. Lord Pal'merston v evropeiskoi diplomatii // Novaya i noveishaya istoriya, 2006. №5. S.182-209.
7.
Gogun A. Na polputi ot istorii k agitke (kritika raboty Mel'tyukhova M. I. Sovetsko-pol'skie voiny. Voenno-politicheskoe protivostoyanie 1919—1939 gg) // Klio (zhurnal dlya uchenykh), 2002. №3. S. 221-224.
8.
Gorokhov P.A. Pravovoi nigilizm. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata filosofskikh nauk. Orenburg, 1998. 148 c.
9.
Granin Yu.D. Natsional'noe gosudarstvo v globaliziruyushchemsya mire. Sotsial'no-filosofskii analiz. - M.: Mediaindustriyaˏ 2014. 362 s.
10.
Kovalev A.A. Informatsionnaya politika i voennaya bezopasnost' Rossii v epokhu protivostoyaniya tsivilizatsii: teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty problemy: Monografiya.-Sankt-Peterburg: Konovalov A. M., 2016. 193 s.
11.
Kuz'mina O.V.ˏ Luk'yanov V.Yu. Ispol'zovanie «dvoinogo standarta»-vazhneishaya problema sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki SPbˏ 2014. S.56-69.
12.
Mel'vil' A.Yu. Politicheskii atlas sovremennosti. – M.: MGIMO (U) MID, 2007. 268 s.
13.
Mel'tyukhov M.I. Sovetsko-pol'skie voiny. Voenno-politicheskoe protivostoyanie 1918-1939 gg. - M., 2001.
14.
Oleinik A.V. Dvoinye standarty zapada protiv terrorizma // Nauchno-analiticheskii zhurnal Observer, 2009. №12. C.34-45.
15.
Panel'naya diskussiya // Epistemologiya & Filosofiya nauki, 2009. T. XXII. №4. S.48-77.
16.
Pivoev V.M. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki: spetsifika i sootnoshenie // Vestnik Ishimskogo gospedinstituta im. P.P.Ershova, 2013. №3. S.91-101.
17.
Rasputnaya L.V. SShA i politika dvoinykh standartov // Kaspiiskii region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura, 2008. №2. S.17-24.
18.
Selivanov F.A. Blagoˏ istinaˏ svyaz'. - Tyumen': RITs TGAKIˏ 2008. S.57.
19.
Shul'ts O.G. Mezhdunarodnye standarty i politika «dvoinykh standartov» v voprosakh mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva v oblasti prav cheloveka // NATsIONAL''NAYa BEZOPASNOST'' / NOTA BENE, 2011. №5. S. 167-180.
20.
Cooper R. The New Liberal Imperialism // The Observerˏ 7 April 2002.
21.
Halik Kochanski. The Eagle Unbowed: Poland and the Poles in the Second World War. — Allen Lane, Harvard University Press, 2012. 734 p.
22.
Kunze Thomas. Nicolae Ceauşescu. Ch. Links Verlag, 2009. 465 S.
23.
Satish Chandra Pandey. International Terrorism and the Contemporary World. Sarup & Sons, 2006. 453 p.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website