Статья 'Внесудебная защита в рамках судебного процесса: о праве стороны по делу знакомиться с истребованной судом медицинской документацией' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Non-judicial protection in judicial process: the right of the party to a case to be familiarized with the medical documents requested by the court

Tolpegin Pavel Vladimirovich

PhD in Technical Science

scientific advisor, Institute for the Analysis of Political Infrastructure

Russia, 107031, Moskva, Petrovka, ul., d. 23/10, str.5.

pavel@tolpegin.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.9805

Review date:

25-12-1969


Publish date:

1-11-2013


Abstract.

The article is devoted to simultaneous study of two legal aspects. The first aspect concern non-judicial approach to protection of lawful rights and interests of a person in cases when such rights are infringed within judicial process, however, it is not possible to challenge the acts of a judge into a court of higher instance. The second aspect provides a direct response to an issue of whether a party to a civil case may get acquainted with the medical documents requested by the courts.  The ambiguity within this issue is due to the fact that medical documents requested by the court as such are not evidence (while the expert opinion based on it is evidence), but the medical documents may be subject to graphologic or other type of expertise.  The problems are analyzed based upon the facts of a specific civil process, where the author used non-judicial protection in the form of being familiarized with the materials of the case with the assistance of various officials and official bodies, including the Chairperson of a District Court, Chiefs of the Court of the Constituent Subject of the Russian Federation, Administration of the President of hte Russian Federation and the Plenipotentiary on Human Rights in the Russian Federation. The author proves efficiency of non-judicial forms of protection of subjective rights and lawful interests even in an on-going judicial case.

Keywords: human rights, judicial expertise, medical secret, addresses of citizens, protection of rights, judicial process, non-judicial protection, medical secret, plenipotentiary, rights of citizens
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 g. № 138-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 18.11.2002 g. № 46 st. 4532.
2.
Pis'mo zamestitelya predsedatelya Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 12.04.2013 g. № 1-429/2013.
3.
Pis'mo predsedatelya Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 24.06.2011 g. № 1-777.
4.
Pis'ma i.o predsedatelya Ostankinskogo raionnogo suda goroda Moskvy ot 29.12.2012 g., 24.01.2013 g., 10.06.2013 g. № 533-K.
5.
Federal'nyi zakona ot 27.07.2006 g. № 149-FZ «Ob informatsii, informatsionnykh tekhnologiyakh i o zashchite informatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 31.07.2006 g. № 31 (chast' I) st. 3448.
6.
Pis'mo direktora Departamenta konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel'stva Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 24.01.2013 g. № 07-5823.
7.
Pis'mo sovetnika Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 27.12.2012 g. № A60-10/103.
8.
Pis'mo Zamestitelya Predsedatelya Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 22.01.2013 g. № 1-VS-259/13.
9.
Zaklyuchenie Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 29.05.2013 g. № VL-11696-22.
10.
Pis'mo i.o. predsedatelya Ostankinskogo raionnogo suda goroda Moskvy ot 24.06.2013 g. № 533-K.
11.
Pis'mo i.o. predsedatelya Ostankinskogo raionnogo suda goroda Moskvy ot 13.09.2013 g. № 2-160/2013.
12.
Pis'mo zamestitelya predsedatelya Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 07.08.2013 g. № 11/110-55729/2013
13.
Konovalov A.O. Aktual'nye problemy zashchity narushennogo prava na dostup k informatsii o deyatel'nosti sudov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 100-124. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9008.html
14.
Vakhrameev R.G. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya konstitutsionnogo prava na informatsiyu // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-12.-C. 23-34. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.12.9854. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9854.html
15.
Grigor'eva O.G. Polnomochiya sovetskikh sudov po okazaniyu mezhdunarodnoi pravovoi pomoshchi po grazhdanskim delam // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-2.-C. 322-361. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_347.html
16.
D.V. Danilenko. Sostyazatel'nost' — universal'nyi printsip sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 4.
17.
P.V. Tolpegin, D.A. Maksimov. Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Rossii: puti razvitiya v XXI veke. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
18.
P. V. Tolpegin. Osobennosti pravoprimenitel'nogo tolkovaniya terminov «vmeshatel'stvo» i «davlenie» v protsedure vnesudebnogo rassmotreniya obrashchenii grazhdan i organizatsii // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 8. – S. 104-107.
19.
Alekberova N.N.. Problemy pravovoi kvalifikatsii mnimykh i pritvornykh sdelok v grazhdanskom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.8800.
20.
Karasev R.E.. Sudebnaya zashchita: ponyatie, znachenie, mesto v sisteme zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.11.10147.
21.
Mil'chakova O.V.. K voprosu o stadiyakh konstitutsionnogo sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.10382.
22.
I.A. Voskanyan. Pravo eksperta na initsiativu i printsip sostyazatel'nosti storon // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 8.
23.
M. V. Makovskii. Vnesudebnyi poryadok obrashcheniya vzyskaniya na zalozhennoe imushchestvo: perspektivy razvitiya. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – № 1.
24.
O.D. Milovidov. Organy vnesudebnogo rassmotreniya zhalob grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh Velikobritanii i SShA // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.2.
25.
A.M. Tsaliev. O neobkhodimosti dal'neishei detsentralizatsii i demokratizatsii sudebnoi vlasti v Rossii // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.7.
26.
Sokolov T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' konstitutsionnogo i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstv: sovremennoe sostoyanie // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9496.
27.
I.A. Voskanyan. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v usloviyakh sostyazatel'nosti storon // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 7.
28.
P. V. Tolpegin. Yuridicheskaya protsedura vnesudebnogo rassmotreniya obrashchenii grazhdan i organizatsii // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 104-107
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website