Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

72 - !
. 72 DOI .
!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Contents of reception of law.
Tkachenko Sergei Vital'evich

PhD in Law

Associate Professor, Department of Social Technologies and Law, Samara State University of Communication Networks

443090, Russia, Samarskaya oblast', g. Samara, pr.K. Marksa, 235, kv. 60

rektor2@rambler.ru

 

 

Article was received:

01-05-2013


Review date:

02-05-2013


Abstract.

The reception of law is a necessary instrumetn for the development of the legal system. As a legal matter, reception is currently the most demanded instrument for the modernization of law.  It is due to the fact that legal system of all states have never been existing in isolation, and they do not do so now.  Then the state attempts to fight reception of law and cultural values in general the situation usually ends up in a complete failure for a state and degradation of a society.  The phenomenon of full-scale reception, which allows to resolve global issues, regarding internal and external challenges to the statehood, deserves special attention.  One of such challenges is crisis of statehood due to the need for modernization.  Such a need may be related to an external threat  of military or economic character. The full-scale reception of law in the framework of legal reforms becomes possible as a result of crisis of state and law. It may therefore be defined as a crisis model for reception.

Keywords: reception, the USSR, China, Roman law, the Fascist Germany, modernization, Hitler, Islam, Westernization, law

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.818

Publish date:

1-6-2013


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Lotman Yu.M. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek tekst semiosfera istoriya. M., 1999. S. 21.
2.
Oppenkheim A. Drevnyaya Mesopotamiya. Portret pogibshei tsivilizatsii. 2-e izd. M., 1990. S. 29.
3.
Saidov D.M.O. Teoreticheskie aspekty vozdeistviya mezhdunarodnogo prava na natsional'nuyu pravovuyu sistemu v perekhodnyi period (na primere Azerbaidzhanskoi respubliki): dis. kand. yurid. nauk.. Volgograd, 2006. S. 8.
4.
Medvedev Yu. Inakomyslyashchii// Rossiiskaya gazeta. 26 oktyabrya 2005. 240.
5.
Rybakov V.A. Retseptsiya prava: obshcheteoreticheskie voprosy: monografiya.-Omsk, 2009.-S.14.
6.
Sm. podr.: Chugrov S.V. Sotsiokul'turnaya traditsiya i vneshnepoliticheskii mentalitet sovremennoi Yaponii: dis. dok.sotsiol.nauk.-M., 2007.-S.67
7.
Fedorova A.S. Ideologiya i praktika sovremennogo islamskogo gosudarstva (na primere Islamskoi Respubliki Iran) // Dvadtsat' pyat' let islamskoi revolyutsii v Irane: Sbornik statei. M., 2005. S. 61.
8.
Levin Z.I,. Reforma v islame. Byt' ili ne byt'?: opyt sistemnogo i sotsiokul'turnogo issledovaniya. M., 2005. S. 6.
9.
Imanipur Mekhdi. Liberal-demokraticheskaya problematika i opyt religioznoi demokratii // Dvadtsat' pyat' let islamskoi revolyutsii v Irane: Sbornik statei. M., 2005. S. 17.
10.
Levin, Z.S. Reforma v islame. Byt' ili ne byt'? Opyt sistemnogo i sotsiokul'turnogo issledovaniya / Z.S. Levin. M., 2005. S. 144.
11.
Pyatiknizhie i gaftarot. Ivritskii tekst s russkim perevodom i klassicheskim kommentariem sonchino. M, Ierusalim. 2001. S 557.
12.
Menakhem Elon. Evreiskoe pravo.-SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2002. S70
13.
Primakov D.Ya. Osobennosti evreiskoi pravovoi sistemy: sravnenie evreiskogo i musul'manskogo prava (VII-XIIIvv.) : avtoref. Dis. kand.yur.nauk.-SPb, 2011.-S.8
14.
Osnovy Rusizma. M., 2001. S. 42.
15.
Savel'ev A.N. Obraz vraga. Rasologiya i politicheskaya antropologiya. Izd. vtoroe i dop., M., 2010. S. 339
16.
Zhivko Stalev. NRB. Sravnitel'nyi metod v sotsialisticheskoi pravovoi nauke// Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie. Sbornik statei. M. Izd. Progress, 1978.-S23.
17.
Varshavskii K.M. Grazhdanskoe pravo v SSSR // Pravovye usloviya torgovo-promyshlennoi deyatel'nosti v SSSR: Sbornik statei. L., 1924. S. 105.
18.
Postanovlenie TsIK SSSR Ob okhrane imushchestva gosudarstvennykh predpriyatii, kolkhozov i kooperatsii i ukreplenii obshchestvennoi (sotsialisticheskoi) sobstvennosti//www/kadis.ru/texts/index.phtml7id=21123&
19.
Krylenko N. Okhrana sotsialisticheskoi sobstvennosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo. 1932. 7/8. S. 17.
20.
Sm.: Ivanov V.N. Mentalitet // Politicheskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1998.
21.
Kamenskii A. Rossiiskaya imperiya v XIII veke: traditsii i modernizatsiya. M., 1999. S. 48.
22.
Chernysheva A.Z. Sotsial'no-politicheskie konflikty v Mesopotamii IIIt. do n.e i metody ikh razresheniya (k voprosu o reformakh i kontrreformakh) // Sotsial'no-politicheskie konflikty v drevnikh obshchestvakh: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Ivanovo, 2001. S. 25.
23.
Tsit. po: Istoriya Yaponii: sb. istorich. proizvedenii. 3-e izd. M., 2003. S. 144.
24.
Tam zhe.
25.
Sm.: Rozengeim M.P. Ocherk istorii voenno-sudnykh uchrezhdenii v Rossii do konchiny Petra Velikogo.-SPb.,1878; Bobrovskii P.O. Voennoe pravo v Rossii pri Petre Velikom. Artikul Voinskii.-2 vyp., SPb. 18821886.
26.
Senyavskii A.S. Transformatsiya sobstvennosti v Rossii v KhKh veke: modernizatsionnye i demodernizatsionnye protsessy // Sobstvennost' v KhKh veke. M., 2001. S. 306-307.
27.
Sm.: Serov D.O. Sudebnaya reforma Petra I: monografiya.-M, 2009.
28.
Diskin I.E. Proryv. Kak nam modernizirovat' Rossiyu-M., 2008. S.106.
29.
Kostenko V.I. Obshcheteoreticheskie gosudarstvenno-pravovye problemy stanovleniya i razvitiya rossiiskoi politicheskoi kul'tury: avtoref. diss. dokt. yurid.nauk.-Ekaterinburg, 2009.-S.35
30.
Komarovskii V.S. Politicheskaya identifikatsiya Rossii: problemy i perspektivy// Sotsiologiya upravleniya.-4, 2009.-S.12
31.
Senyavskii A.S. Transformatsiya sobstvennosti v Rossii v KhKh veke: modernizatsionnye i demodernizatsionnye protsessy // Sobstvennost' v KhKh veke: sbornik nauchnykh statei. M., 2001. S. 310.
32.
Sm.: Denisov V.I. Politicheskie sistemy gosudarstv Koreiskogo poluostrova (RK i KNDR)// Politicheskie sistemy i politicheskie kul'tury Vostoka: Sbornik statei /Pod red. A.D. Voskresenskogo. M., 2007.-S.571
33.
Sm.: Molodyakova E.V. Neordinarnaya demokratiya v Yaponii // Yaponiya: mify i real'nost'. M., 1999.
34.
Vasilenko I.A. Dialog tsivilizatsii: sotsiokul'turnye problemy politicheskogo partnerstva. M., 1999. S. 111.
35.
Vinogradov A.V. Kitaiskaya model' modernizatsii: sotsial'no-politicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye aspekty: avtoref. diss. dokt.yurid.nauk.-M.2006.-S.35
36.
Sm.: Arin O.A. (Aliev R.Sh.). Strategicheskie kontury Vostochnoi Azii v KhKhI veke. Rossiya: ni shagu vpered. M., 2001.
37.
Shalyganov Yu.V. Proekt Rossiya. Chetvertaya kniga: Bol'shaya ideya/ Yurii Shalygin.-M, 2010.-S.67
38.
Sm. podrobnee: Kukushkin Yu.S., Timofeev N.S. Samoupravlenie krest'yan Rossii ( XIX-nachalo XXIv.)-M.,2004.-S.73.
39.
I. V. Fedyakin. K voprosu ob ispol'zovanii zarubezhnogo opyta politiki razvitiya megapolisov v sovremennoi Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2012. 4. S. 104-107.
40.
I.P. Antonov. Teorii obespecheniya realizatsii norm mezhdunarodnogo prava v sisteme natsional'nogo zakonodatel'stva FRG // Pravo i politika. 2009. 12.
41.
Yu.V.Skvortsova. Rol' retseptsii prava v stanovlenii i razvitii rossiiskoi pravovoi sistemy // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2010. 2.
42.
S.V. Tkachenko. Sovremennaya model' rossiiskogo federalizma // Pravo i politika. 2009. 10.
43.
S.V. Tkachenko. Mifologiya rossiiskoi retseptsii prava: pravo chastnoi sobstvennosti // Pravo i politika. 2009. 9.
44.
S.V. Tkachenko. Dobrovol'nost' i odnostoronnost' retseptsii prava // Pravo i politika. 2009. 7.
45.
S. V. Tkachenko. Retseptsiya prava: problemy pochvy // Pravo i politika. 2009. 6.
46.
S. V. Tkachenko. Vliyanie donora na retseptsiyu prava. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2009. 2.
47.
S.V. Tkachenko. Retseptsiya prava kak informatsionno-psikhologicheskoe oruzhie. // Pravo i politika. 2009. 5.
48.
S.V. Tkachenko. Pravovoi nigilizm Rossii kak osnovnoi mif retseptsii Zapadnogo prava. // Pravo i politika. 2009. 4.
49.
S.V. Tkachenko. Retseptsiya zapadnogo prava v Rossii. // Pravo i politika. 2009. 3.
50.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovoi mentalitet rossiiskikh grazhdan // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 4. - C. 108 - 133. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_310.html
51.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Dialektika estestvennogo i pozitivnogo prava kak istochnik obshchestvenno-pravovogo progressa // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 221 - 238. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.559. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_559.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website