—тать€ '»мущественный налоговый вычет: проблемы правоприменени€ ' - журнал 'ёридические исследовани€' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

ѕубликаци€ за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
ѕри необходимости издательство предоставл€ет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. ”же через 72 часа стать€ по€вл€етс€ в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
ѕо первому требованию предоставл€ем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Property-related tax deduction: the problems of legal practice.

Tokareva Kristina Grigor'evna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Entrepreneurial Law of the Institute for Economics, Management and Law (Kazan)

423822, the Republic of Tatarstan, Naberezhnye Chelny, Moskovskiy pr-t, d.67

tkg81@mail.ru
ƒругие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.551

Review date:

25-12-1969


Publish date:

1-3-2013


Abstract.

The only provision of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation on property-related tax deduction is Art. 220 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. However, there is a large number of practical problems related to them. Considerable amount of disputes arises between tax bodies and good faith taxpayers on the excess amounts paid.  The article concerns some topical aspects regarding implementation of a right for the property-related tax deduction, in particular, the complications with getting the Personal Income Tax (NDFL-2) report at the place of work. The author recommends taxpayers to require provision of NDFL-2 report by written notification by registered mail, or address the Labor Inspection.  The article also includes discussion of the problems regarding violations on the period of payment on property-related tax deductions. In such cases a taxpayer should address the tax body and require that the payment of interest for the unlawful use of money due to him would be paid and provide the calculation. If the delay is significant, the taxpayer should file complaints on the acts of tax inspection to the relevant Division of the Federal Tax Service in his region.

Keywords: refinancing rate, delay, untimely return, report, declaration, tax deduction
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Zrelov A. P. Imushchestvennyi nalogovyi vychet. Ц M.: Delovoi dvor, 2008. Ц S. 4.
2.
Nalogovyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Chast' vtoraya: Federal'nyi zakon ot 05 maya 2000 g. є 117-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. Ц 2000. Ц є 32. Ц St. 3340.
3.
Trudovoi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi zakon ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. є 197-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2002. Ц є 1 (ch. 1). Ц St. 3.
4.
Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 g. // Rossiiskaya gazeta. Ц 1993. Ц 25 dekabrya.
5.
Nalogovyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Chast' pervaya: Federal'nyi zakon ot 31 iyulya 1998 g. є 146-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Z RF. Ц 1998. Ц є 31. Ц St. 3824.
6.
Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 22 dekabrya 2005 g. є 98 ЂO praktike razresheniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del, svyazannykh s primeneniem otdel'nykh polozhenii glavy 25 NK RFї // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. Ц 2006. Ц є 3.
7.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF i Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 08 oktyabrya 1998 g. є 13/14 ЂO praktike primeneniya polozhenii Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii o protsentakh za pol'zovanie chuzhimi denezhnymi sredstvamiї // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. Ц 1998. Ц є 11.
8.
Popova S.S.. Ispol'zovanie ponyatii "imushchestvo" i "imushchestvennye prava" v tselyakh nalogooblozheniya // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2013. Ц є 12. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.12.1086.
9.
Pylaeva A.V.. O nalogovoi nagruzke na fizicheskikh lits po nalogu na ob''ekty zhilogo fonda, ischislennomu na osnove kadastrovoi stoimosti // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2013. Ц є 7. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.7.9345.
10.
E.V. Borovikova. Spornye voprosy ischisleniya NDFL i arbitrazhnaya praktika ikh razresheniya // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2012. Ц є 7. Ц S. 104-107.
11.
R. N. Kalakov. Nalogovye preferentsii po nalogu na pribyl' v sfere innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2012. Ц є 6. Ц S. 104-107.
12.
A. S. Galyautdinova. Sem'ya kak uchastnik nalogovykh pravootnoshenii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2012. Ц є 6. Ц S. 104-107.
13.
A. A. Bazhenov, E. V. Usacheva. Izmenenie nalogovykh vychetov po nalogu na dokhody fizicheskikh lits kak dopolnitel'nyi istochnik dokhodov regional'nogo i mestnykh byudzhetov (na primere Vladimirskoi oblasti) // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2011. Ц є 12. Ц S. 104-107.
14.
Semenova N.V.. Osobennosti nalogovogo regulirovaniya deyatel'nosti nekommercheskikh organizatsii v Rossii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2011. Ц є 5.
15.
Kalakov R.N.. Praktika predostavleniya nalogovykh l'got v zarubezhnykh stranakh // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2010. Ц є 9.
16.
Urubkova I.A.. Printsipy spravedlivosti i ravenstva v nalogovom prave // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2010. Ц є 5.
17.
Korf D.V.. Nalogooblozhenie v sfere obrazovaniya: opyt SShA // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2009. Ц є 12.
18.
Ignatov A.V.. Priobretenie kvartiry v stroyashchemsya dome: problemy normativnogo tolkovaniya pri poluchenii imushchestvennogo nalogovogo vycheta // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2009. Ц є 11.
19.
Sbezhnev A.A.. Nekotorye pravovye aspekty vozniknoveniya prava na nalogovye vychety po NDFL // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2009. Ц є 10.
20.
Pavlenko S.P.. Pravovaya priroda vychetov i osvobozhdenii po nalogu na dokhody fizicheskikh lits // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. Ц 2010. Ц є 12
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website