Статья 'Правовая конвергенция регулирования обращения технологий здравоохранения в международном праве' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Convergence of legal regulation of circulation of healthcare technologies in international law

Malichenko Vladislav Sergeevich

ORCID: 0000-0003-3136-8054

PhD in Law

Senior Researcher of the Department of Social Legislation, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

117218, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Bol'shaya Cheremushkinskaya Ul, 34

vlad.malichenko@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2022.5.38064

Received:

12-05-2022


Published:

19-05-2022


Abstract: The subject of the research is the legal regulation of public relations in the process of circulation of healthcare technologies. The purpose of the research is to analyze the features of convergence of legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies in order to develop theoretical and practical proposals to counter modern challenges and threats in this area. The article is prepared using general scientific methods of cognition, including formal-logical and situational, and private-legal methods, such as comparative-legal, historical-legal and formal-legal. The novelty of the research lies in revelation of legal convergence in the system of international law as an important mechanism for the formation of access to safe, high-quality and effective technologies for healthcare and human security. The article summarizes the main threats in the sphere of circulation of healthcare technologies that require the introduction of uniform regulatory standards. The author analyzes the features of the harmonization and integration on the example of the activities of regional integration associations in order to form recommendations for the development of legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies within the common market of the EAEU countries. The novelty of the article lies in the systematic consideration of legal convergence in the system of international law as an important mechanism for the formation of access to safe, high-quality and effective healthcare technologies and ensuring human safety. Justifying the lack of a systematic approach to the convergence of international legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies, the author suggests considering the possibility of preparing a normative legal act of a universal nature in this area, by analogy with codifying conventions in other branches of international law. The author analyzes the features of the harmonization and integration on the example of the activities of regional integration associations in order to form recommendations for the development of legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies within the framework of the common market of the EAEU countries


Keywords:

convergence, harmonization, healthcare technologies, international health law, the right to health, single market, regional integration, The EAEU, eu, human security

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Introduction

Under the influence of scientific achievements of the last decades, health technologies have transformed into one of the most important elements of ensuring the human right to the highest attainable level and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. The importance of access to health technologies on the international agenda was formulated within the framework of the Millennium Development Goals approved by the UN General Assembly in 2000 and further within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals, also approved by the UN General Assembly in 2015, as one of the objectives of SDG No. 3 "Ensuring a healthy lifestyle and promoting well-being for all in any age" [1, pp. 256-285].

The circulation of healthcare technologies is a complex process, each of the stages of which involves the need to regulate certain spheres of public relations and can potentially limit the provision of equal and fair access to healthcare technologies, as well as form other threats to human security. The complexity of ensuring proper regulation of the processes of circulation of health technologies is associated with their global nature, involving different countries at the stages of development, production, transportation.

Such trends determine the desire of the international community, as well as individual regions of associations, to ensure maximum convergence of the normative content of legal acts regulating the circulation of healthcare technologies in order to form uniform standards of safety, quality, efficiency, and also promote timely access to necessary treatment.

The role of healthcare technologies in the formation of threats and challenges to human security

          Infectious pandemics, the frequency of registration of which has been rapidly increasing since the beginning of the new millennium, as well as demographic changes expressed in the increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), lead to an increase in the strategic importance of health technologies. The specifics of regulating the circulation of healthcare technologies form a number of systemic threats and challenges to human security.

It is necessary to dwell separately on some stages of the circulation of healthcare technologies that are of the greatest importance for the sustainability of this system. One of the first harmonization processes concerned the standards for conducting clinical trials of medicines, and subsequently other healthcare technologies, in order to ensure proper quality control and effectiveness at the registration stage. Unified standards for conducting clinical trials can prevent cases of falsification of the results obtained. The facts of registration of such activities have been repeatedly considered in the scientific literature [9, p.1-13; 11, p.161-173].

No less important is the stage of production of healthcare technologies. First of all, it is necessary to ensure uniform standards for quality control of production, especially in developing countries of the pharmaceutical industry. An increase in the demand for medicines and medical devices leads to an expansion of the scale of production of more affordable analogues, which is often accompanied by a decrease in product quality standards [12, pp.218-243]. It should also be noted that the peculiarities of the production of a number of medicines and medical devices imply potentially high levels of emissions into the environment, which, as a consequence, creates additional risks to human health [13, pp.1-7].

An increase in the need for healthcare technologies leads to the formation of a shortage and, as a consequence, an increase in the detection of counterfeit and low-quality products, which exacerbates the problems of monitoring the safety and quality of healthcare technologies [18, pp.93-98]. States are not able to independently ensure the necessary quality of control and supervisory measures and the development of the regulatory environment, which is the basis for the harmonization of regulatory regulation at the regional level [7, pp.256-285].

The most discussed issues today are pricing and the inclusion of healthcare technologies in state health insurance programs. Historically, this aspect of the circulation of healthcare technologies has been exclusively regulated by domestic law. However, more and more attention is being paid to the formation of legal mechanisms for the exchange of information on pricing between states [17], as well as the introduction of unified approaches to the assessment of healthcare technologies.

Legal convergence in the international legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies.

The need to form unified approaches to the regulatory regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies served as an incentive to strengthen the processes of "legal convergence". "Legal convergence" should be understood as the activities of entities with a rule-making function to bring international and national law closer, aimed at achieving uniformity and unity of legal regulation [2]. Legal convergence is carried out on the basis of the following methods: harmonization, unification and integration [3, p. 26-30].

Unification presupposes the formation of a single normative legal act regulating a certain sphere of public relations at the regional and international level. The integration process is aimed at achieving the unity of legal regulation and strengthening the interdependence of states, being a higher degree of consistency of the wills of states [1, pp.63-67]. Harmonization in the scientific literature refers to the process of convergence of national legal systems, reduction and elimination of differences between them [4, p.164; 5, p.122].

The processes of convergence of regulatory and legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies should address the following issues: organization, conduct and financing of scientific research; introduction of healthcare technologies into the system of medical and social care; protection of exclusive rights of developers; ensuring the safety and quality of production and application of healthcare technologies; introduction of sustainable mechanisms for the transfer of healthcare technologies; limiting emissions during production; ensuring rational application; implementation of a fair pricing system.

One of the first initiatives to ensure legal convergence was the establishment in 1990 of the International Conference on the Harmonization of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceutical Products Used by Humans (ICH), aimed at harmonizing the regulatory regulation of individual stages of the circulation of healthcare technologies. The International Conference ensures the development of guidelines on the safety, quality and effectiveness of medicines, which subsequently become mandatory after their approval by acts of domestic law [14, pp. 926-931]. In particular, it is worth mentioning the guidelines on "Good Clinical Practice" (GCP), aimed at the introduction of uniform standards for quality assurance of clinical trials of medicines, or the guidelines on "Good Manufacturing Practice" (GMP), providing uniform standards for the production of medicines in various regions of the world. Thus, in the EU, the ICH guidelines are implemented by the Committee on Medicinal Products for Humans (CHMP) and are included in the list of scientific guidelines that the subjects of circulation of medicines in the EU must comply with. In accordance with Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community Code of Medicinal products for medical use, each application for a permit for the circulation of a medicinal product in the EU must take into account the ICH guidelines.

Another example of harmonization is the development of the Council of Europe Convention "On Combating the Falsification of Medical Products and Similar Crimes that Threaten Public Health" (CCE No. 211 Convention "Medicrim"). The provisions of the Convention are aimed at forming a unified understanding of the concept of "falsified medical products", which has been the subject of discussions by the World Health Organization for many years. In addition, the document provides a standardized list of liability measures for falsification of medical products and similar crimes for subsequent implementation into the national legislation of countries that have ratified the Convention [8, p.87-100].

It is impossible not to note the role of regional trade agreements in ensuring the harmonization of certain aspects that determine access to health technologies. In particular, most regional trade agreements contain provisions establishing additional measures to protect intellectual property rights on the territory of the participating countries. In scientific works, such measures have been called "TRIPS Plus" and "TRIPS Extra", since they introduce additional mechanisms for protecting intellectual property rights that are not contained in the TRIPS Agreement [10]. Such a manifestation of harmonization may have negative consequences for ensuring the human right to the highest attainable standard of health due to the potential restriction of access to health technologies in certain regions of the world [16, pp.1-40].

It should be noted that today the convergence of international legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies affects only certain stages of this process, not allowing a systematic approach to be formed. One of the practical solutions to this problem may be the development of a normative legal act of a universal nature, which makes it possible to form the basic principles and approaches to regulating this sphere, by analogy with codifying conventions existing in other branches of international law.

 

The practice of harmonization of regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies in the activities of regional integration associations.

          The strengthening of processes aimed at the formation of a single economic space and the development of trade processes on the territory of a particular region contributed to the development of the application of methods of harmonization and integration of regulatory regulation of the circulation of health technologies.      

          As a first example, it is necessary to refer to the experience of forming a unified system of regulation of medicines in the European Union. Harmonization processes began on the territory of the EU with the convening of the European Commission conference of representatives of industry, doctors and consumers to discuss the standardization of the regulatory framework in the pharmaceutical sector and already in 1965 Directive 65/65/EEC of the European Economic Community "On the approximation of legislative provisions, rules and administrative measures in relation to medicines" was approved. In the following years, dozens of directives, decisions and resolutions of the governing bodies of the European Community, and later the EU, were adopted. As part of the development of harmonization processes at the beginning of the new millennium, the previously existing regulations were revised and replaced by the single Directive 2001/83/EC of November 6, 2001.

          The manifestation of the integration method was the establishment of the European Agency for the Examination of Medicines, later renamed the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which establishes union registration and supervision procedures for medicines. The main task of the EMA is to conduct expert activities associated with different stages of the circulation of medicines, including centralized registration and pharmacovigilance, on the basis of which the necessary decisions are made at the level of EU management institutions. The emergence of a centralized procedure for the registration of certain categories of medicines in its meaning is a kind of apotheosis of the integration process, in which the participating countries delegate part of the sovereign rights in relation to the examination and determination of the expediency of allowing the circulation of a medicinal product on the territory of the state [6, p.75-81].

          The increase in cases of registration of low-quality and falsified medicines in the countries of the African region has strengthened the use of harmonization and integration methods. In particular, in 2009, an Initiative was established to harmonize the regulation of the circulation of medicines in African countries, which developed a "Model Law on the Regulation of Medical Products", approved by the heads of State and Government at the summit of the African Union in Addis Ababa in 2016. The Model Law forms a framework for harmonization at the regional and subregional levels in order to expand cooperation between countries and ensuring the development, testing and application of promising healthcare technologies to improve the performance of healthcare systems [15, p.1-12]. In November 2021, an agreement on the establishment of the African Medicines Agency entered into force with the aim of forming standards and rules to improve the effectiveness of regulating the circulation of medical products and coordinating the activities of national regulatory authorities for their implementation

          Special attention should be paid to the practice of using convergence methods in the context of the formation of single markets for medicines and medical products in the space of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). It should be noted that the activities of the single markets do not imply full integration of regulatory regulation, being limited to the harmonization and unification of the legislation of the member states. The Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union defines the concept of harmonization, which should be understood as the convergence of legislation to establish comparable regulatory regulation in certain areas. According to the Methodology of Harmonization of the legislation of the EAEU member states, the unification of national legislations involves bringing national legislation into relation with supranational acts of the EAEU to ensure their full identity.

Long-term priorities for the development of harmonization of regulatory and legal regulation are determined in accordance with the provisions of the Decision of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council dated 11.12.2020 No. 12 "On Strategic directions for the development of Eurasian economic integration until 2025". In particular, in paragraph 4.10.1. of the document, tasks are formulated for "the adoption of the concept of further development of common markets for medicines and medical devices within the Union. In paragraph 10.3.7. tasks are defined for "creating effective mechanisms for supporting and financing joint initiatives and cooperative projects in the field of research and the introduction of innovative developments in prevention, diagnosis and treatment infectious diseases".

          Based on the practice of applying methods of harmonization and integration within the framework of convergence of regulatory regulation of the circulation of health technologies in the European and African region, it is advisable to consider the possibility of creating a supranational body of the EAEU authorized to regulate certain stages of the circulation of health technologies. Equally important is the formation of unified approaches to setting the maximum selling price for strategically important medicines and medical products in the EAEU countries, which will prevent situations of unfair pricing, as well as provide a unified approach to the formation of supranational guarantees of human security.

Conclusion

To date, a small number of scientific publications are devoted to the study of the features of convergence of legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies. However, the globalization of the processes of development, production and transportation of medicines and medical devices, involving the simultaneous involvement of states with different levels of regulatory system development, determine the need for systematic application of convergence methods to ensure timely access to safe and high-quality healthcare technologies.

 

References
1. Bezborodov Y. S. (2012) International Legal Integration: Approaches to Understanding the Phenomenon. Russian legal journal. 1, 62—67.
2. Bezborodov Y. S. (2018) International legal methods and forms of legal convergence: monograph. Moscow: Prospekt, 240 p.
3. Bezborodov, Y. S. (2013). Universalization and localization of international legal regulation in the context of globalization. Russian legal journal, (3), 26-30.
4. Getman-Pavlova I.V. (2013) International private law: textbook / ed. I.V. Hetman-Pavlov. M.: Yurayt, 164.
5. Dmitrieva G.K. (2015) International private law. 4th edition. Textbook. Rep. ed. Dmitrieva G.K. M.: Prospect, 122.
6. Malichenko V. S. (2022) Harmonization of healthcare technologies regulation in frame of regional integration processes. Remedium;(1):75–81.
7. Malichenko V.S. (2021) International Law Regulation of Access to Health Technologies. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no. 5, pp. 256–285
8. Маличенко, В. С. (2020). International Legal Mechanism for Countering the Proliferation of Poor-Quality and Falsified Medical. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, (1), 87-100.
9. Thiese, M. S., Walker, S., & Lindsey, J. (2017). Truths, lies, and statistics. Journal of thoracic disease, 9(10), 4117
10. Correa, C. M. (2017). Mitigating the regulatory constraints imposed by intellectual property rules under free trade agreements (No. 74). Research Paper.
11. George, S. L., & Buyse, M. (2015). Data fraud in clinical trials. Clinical investigation, 5(2), 161.
12. Johnston, A., & Holt, D. W. (2014). Substandard drugs: a potential crisis for public health. British journal of clinical pharmacology, 78(2), 218-243.
13. Larsson, D. J. (2014). Pollution from drug manufacturing: review and perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1656), 20130571.
14. Lindström‐Gommers, L., & Mullin, T. (2019). International conference on harmonization: recent reforms as a driver of global regulatory harmonization and innovation in medical products. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 105(4), 926-931.
15. Roth, L., Bempong, D., Babigumira, J. B., Banoo, S., Cooke, E., Jeffreys, D., ... & Nwokike, J. (2018). Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 1-12.
16. Tenni, B., Moir, H. V., Townsend, B., Kilic, B., Farrell, A. M., Keegel, T., & Gleeson, D. (2022). What is the impact of intellectual property rules on access to medicines? A systematic review. Globalization and health, 18(1), 1-40.
17. World Health Organization. (2020). Cross-country collaborations to improve access to medicines and vaccines in the WHO European Region.
18. White, C. M. (2021). Counterfeit drugs: A major issue for vulnerable citizens throughout the world and in the United States. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 61(1), e93-e98.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

A REVIEW of an article on the topic "Legal convergence of regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies in international law". The subject of the study. The article proposed for review is devoted to topical issues of legal regulation of relations regarding the use of technologies in the field of healthcare from the point of view of international law. The author examines various scientific points of view on this problem, and suggests directions for further discussion. The subject of the study was international legal acts, opinions of scientists, and practice on issues related to the topic of the study. Research methodology. The purpose of the study is not stated directly in the article. At the same time, it can be clearly understood from the title and content of the work. The goal can be designated as the consideration and resolution of certain problematic aspects of the issue of legal regulation of relations regarding the use of technologies in the field of healthcare from the point of view of international law. Based on the set goals and objectives, the author has chosen the methodological basis of the study. In particular, the author uses a set of general scientific methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, induction, and others. In particular, the methods of analysis and synthesis made it possible to summarize and share the conclusions of various scientific approaches to the proposed topic, as well as draw specific conclusions from the materials of practice. The most important role was played by special legal methods. In particular, the author actively applied the formal legal method, which made it possible to analyze and interpret the norms of current legislation (first of all, the provisions of international legal acts). For example, the following conclusion of the author: "It is impossible not to note the role of regional trade agreements in ensuring the harmonization of certain aspects that determine access to health technologies. In particular, most regional trade agreements contain provisions establishing additional measures to protect intellectual property rights on the territory of the participating countries. In scientific works, such measures have been called "TRIPS Plus" and "TRIPS Extra", as they introduce additional mechanisms for protecting intellectual property rights that are not contained in the framework of the TRIPS Agreement [10]. Such a manifestation of harmonization may have negative consequences for ensuring the human right to the highest attainable standard of health due to the potential restriction of access to health technologies in certain regions of the world [16, pp.1-40]." It is necessary to positively evaluate the possibilities of an empirical research method associated with, in a particular case, the study of specific examples on research issues. Thus, the article states: "The practice of using convergence methods in the context of the formation of single markets for medicines and medical products in the space of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) deserves special attention. It should be noted that the activities of the single markets do not imply full integration of regulatory regulation, being limited to the harmonization and unification of the legislation of the member States. The Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union defines the concept of harmonization, which should be understood as the convergence of legislation to establish comparable regulatory regulation in certain areas. According to the Methodology of Harmonization of legislation of the EAEU member States, the unification of national legislations involves bringing national legislation into line with supranational acts of the EAEU to ensure their full identity." Thus, the methodology chosen by the author is fully adequate to the purpose of the study, allows you to study all aspects of the topic in its entirety. Relevance. The relevance of the stated issues is beyond doubt. There are both theoretical and practical aspects of the significance of the proposed topic. From the point of view of theory, the topic of determining the legal aspects of regulating the circulation of health technologies in international law is important and necessary in connection with the modern development of technology and the need to develop mechanisms for protecting the rights of citizens. The author is right to highlight this aspect of relevance. On the practical side, it should be recognized that certain unified mechanisms of legal regulation in different countries should be developed, which contributed to the improvement of practice in this direction. The practical examples given by the author in the article clearly demonstrate this issue. Thus, scientific research in the proposed field should only be welcomed. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the proposed article is beyond doubt. Firstly, it is expressed in the author's specific conclusions. Among them, for example, is the following conclusion: "To date, a small number of scientific publications have been devoted to studying the features of convergence of legal regulation of the circulation of healthcare technologies. However, the globalization of the processes of development, production and transportation of medicines and medical devices, involving the simultaneous involvement of states with different levels of regulatory system development, determines the need for systematic application of convergence methods to ensure timely access to safe and high-quality healthcare technologies." These and other theoretical conclusions can be used in further scientific research. Secondly, the author offers interesting generalizations of legislation and law of various countries, which in itself can be significant in the context of developing common approaches to the institution in question, as well as contribute to further productive discussions. For example, this applies to the following: "Based on the practice of applying methods of harmonization and integration within the framework of convergence of regulatory regulation of the circulation of health technologies in the European and African region, it is advisable to consider the possibility of creating a supranational body of the EAEU authorized to regulate certain stages of the circulation of health technologies. Equally important is the formation of unified approaches to setting the maximum selling price for strategically important medicines and medical products in the EAEU countries, which will prevent situations of unfair pricing, as well as provide a unified approach to the formation of supranational guarantees of human security." The above conclusions may be relevant and useful for law-making activities. Thus, the materials of the article may be of particular interest to the scientific community in terms of contributing to the development of science. Style, structure, content. The subject of the article corresponds to the specialization of the journal "Legal Studies", as it is devoted to legal problems related to international legal regulation. The content of the article fully corresponds to the title, since the author considered the stated problems and achieved the research goal. The quality of the presentation of the study and its results should be recognized as fully positive. The subject, objectives, methodology and main results of the study follow directly from the text of the article. The design of the work generally meets the requirements for this kind of work. No significant violations of these requirements were found. Bibliography. The quality of the literature used should be highly appreciated. The author actively uses the literature presented by authors from Russia and abroad (Bezborodov Y. S., Getman-Pavlova I.V., Dmitrieva G.K., Malichenko V.S., Correa C., George S.L., Buyse M., Johnston, A. Holt, D. and others). I would like to note the author's use of a large number of works by foreign authors in foreign languages, which made it possible to give the study a comparative legal orientation. Thus, the works of the above authors correspond to the research topic, have a sign of sufficiency, and contribute to the disclosure of various aspects of the topic. Appeal to opponents.
The author conducted a serious analysis of the current state of the problem under study. All quotes from scientists are accompanied by author's comments. That is, the author shows different points of view on the problem and tries to argue for a more correct one in his opinion. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The conclusions are fully logical, as they are obtained using a generally accepted methodology. The article may be of interest to the readership in terms of the systematic positions of the author in relation to the issues and problems stated in it. Based on the above, summing up all the positive and negative sides of the article, "I recommend publishing"
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.