' : , ' - ' ' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Anti-corruption denunciation: methodological problems, foreign experience, and Russian prospects

Trofimov Egor Viktorovich

ORCID: 0000-0003-4585-8820

Doctor of Law

Deputy Director for Science, St. Petersburg Institute (Branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice

199178, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, 10-ya liniya V.O., 19, lit. A, kab. 36

diterihs@mail.ru

 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2021.4.36658

Review date:

12-10-2021


Publish date:

19-10-2021


Abstract: This article is dedicated to the institution of denunciation as a specific form of disclosure of illegal and unfair practices. For determination of the conceptual legal meaning of denunciation and its prospects for modern Russia as anti-corruption legal institution, this article coordinates the interdisciplinary scientific results of research on denunciation, analyzes and summarizes the international (UN, EU) and national (United States, Great Britain, South Korea, Brazil, China, Albania, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine) regulatory approaches towards denunciation, and similar forms of disclosure of offenses. The article reveals the current state of the Russian legislation in this sphere. The research employs the methods of dogmatic analysis, comparative-legal and systemic-analytical toolset. The author correlates denunciation and denunciator with such concepts as “denouncement”, “actio popularis”, “reporting party”, “informant” and “whistleblower”; determines the twelve characteristics of denunciation, which collectively define it as a special form of information disclosure. The conclusion is made that the variants of legal regulation of denunciation are built around or within such issues as the protection of denunciator, his interaction with the authorized entities and remuneration, as well as the conclusion on the absence of specific legal means in the current Russian legislation that ensure denunciation as the social institution. The author formulates recommendations on amending the labor, administrative, criminal and procedural legislation aimed at implementation of measures for protecting the denunciators.


Keywords: award, qui tam provision, civil control, whistleblower, disclosure, denunciation, anti-corruption, corruption, incentive, protection
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Balog M. M. Protivodeistvie korruptsii v Rossii: zashchita zayavitelei // Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Pravo. Upravlenie. 2018. 8. S. 3944.
2.
Miceli M. P., Near Ja. P. Relationships among Value Congruence, Perceived Victimization, and Retaliation against Whistle-Blowers // Journal of Management. 1994. Vol. 20, 4. Pp. 773794.
3.
Berlin P. Russkoe vzyatochnichestvo kak sotsial'no-istoricheskoe yavlenie // Sovremennyi mir. 1910. 8. S. 4854.
4.
Buldygerova L. N., Daruda M. Yu. Pravovoe regulirovanie donosa v Rossii (XIVXIX vv.) // Innovatsionnoe razvitie sovremennoi yuridicheskoi nauki: materialy III vserossiiskogo nauchno-prakticheskogo konkursa molodykh uchenykh, aspirantov i studentov, posvyashchennogo pamyati prof. A. P. Lonchakova. Khabarovsk: TOGU, 2019. 184 s. S. 914.
5.
Ignatov V. D. Donoschiki v istorii Rossii i SSSR. M.: Veche, 2014. 432 s.
6.
Gellately R. Denunciation as a Subject of Historical Research // Historical Social Research = Historische Sozialforschung. 2001. Vol. 26, 2/3 (96/97). Pp. 1629.
7.
Grant C. Whistle Blowers: Saints of Secular Culture // Journal of Business Ethics. 2002. Vol. 39, 4. Pp. 391399.
8.
Bergemann P. Denunciation and Social Control // American Sociological Review. 2017. Vol. 82, 2. Pp. 384406.
9.
Nekhamkin V. A. Donos kak sotsial'no-psikhologicheskii fenomen (iz otechestvennogo opyta 1930-kh godov) // Istoricheskaya psikhologiya i sotsiologiya istorii. 2014. T. 7, 2. C. 6379.
10.
Vladimirova L. V., Buzanova T. V. Konkurentsiya leksem stukach i donoschik v russkom yazyke // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2018. T. 160. 5. S. 11631175.
11.
Shapir M. I. Donos: sotsiolingvisticheskii aspekt: Igra slovami kak sredstvo yazykovoi politiki // Logicheskii analiz yazyka: Kontseptual'nye polya igry / otv. red. N.D. Arutyunova. M.: Indrik, 2006. 544 s. S. 483492.
12.
Zimbuli A. E. Spletnya i donos: eticheskii analiz // Simvol nauki. 2015. 7. S. 5864.
13.
Makarenko V. A. Fenomen donosa v kontekste gosudarstvennogo tsinizma // Politicheskaya kontseptologiya. 2014. 4. S. 620.
14.
Smirnov A. V., Dukhnovskii S. V., Gvardychenko V. V. Psikhologicheskii simptomokompleks lichnosti informatora // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2020. T. 22, 4. S. 10181027.
15.
Lennane K. J. Whistleblowing: A Health Issue // British Medical Journal: International Edition. 1993. Vol. 307, 6905. Pp. 667670.
16.
Mikhnevich A. V., Malyshev N. D. Informator: Iuda nastoyashchego vremeni ili spasitel' chelovechestva? // Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki. 2017. T. 6, 1. S. 7985.
17.
Sabitov R. A. Pravovoe stimulirovanie soobshchenii o korruptsii // Viktimologiya. 2017. 4. S. 513.
18.
Sukhov E. V. Neopredelennost' pravovogo polozheniya informatorov za voznagrazhdenie v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve. 2018. 4. S. 8588.
19.
Amel'chakov O. I. Nesoobshchenie o prestuplenii v otechestvennom ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve // Sotsial'no-politicheskie nauki. 2017. 5. S. 156159.
20.
Klimenko Yu. A. Nesoobshchenie o prestuplenii (stat'ya 205.6 UK RF): yuridicheskaya priroda, sootnoshenie s ukryvatel'stvom i souchastiem v terrorizme // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2017. 9. S. 163171.
21.
Krutikina Yu. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nesoobshchenie o prestuplenii: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2020. 266 s.
22.
Petrikova S. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nesoobshchenie o prestuplenii // Sotsial'no-politicheskie nauki. 2017. 1. S. 126128.
23.
Dal' V. Tolkovyi slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: v 4-kh t. T. 1. M.: Rus. yaz., 1989. 699 s.
24.
Slovar' inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v sostav russkogo yazyka / sost. pod red. V. N. Chudinova. SPb.: Izd. knigoprodavtsa V. I. Gubinskogo, 1894. 4, IV, 989, III s.
25.
Chervinskii P., Nadel'-Chervinskaya M. Tolkovo-etimologicheskii slovar' inostrannykh slov russkogo yazyka. Ternopol': Krok, 2012. 640 s.
26.
Popov M. Polnyi slovar' inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v upotreblenie v russkom yazyke. 3-e izd., [dop. i ispr.]. M.: t-vo I. D. Sytina, 1907. 458, 136 s.
27.
Yatsenko N. E. Tolkovyi slovar' obshchestvovedcheskikh terminov. SPb.: Lan', 1999. 524 s.
28.
Svidetel'stvo 2013616013 Rossiiskaya Federatsiya. Bol'shoi slovar' sinonimov russkogo yazyka V. N. Trishina: 2013612762: zayavl. 28.03.2013: opubl. 20.09.2013 / Trishin V. N.; zayavitel' Trishin V. N. 1 s.
29.
Ozhegov S. I. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: AST, 2021. 736 s.
30.
Bol'shoi tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka / sost. i gl. red. S. A. Kuznetsov. SPb.: Norint, 2000. 1536 s.
31.
Dvoretskii I. Kh. Latinsko-russkii slovar'. 5-e izd., ster. M.: Rus. yaz., 1998. 846 s.
32.
Ivanov A. A., Voronov V. M. Rimskoe pravo. Osnovnye ponyatiya, zakony i iski, personalii i sententsii. 2-e izd., ster. M.: Flinta, 2015. 317 s.
33.
Bartoshek M. Rimskoe pravo: (Ponyatiya, terminy, opredeleniya) / per. s cheshsk. M. Yurid. lit., 1989. 448 s.
34.
Germanov A. V. Ot pol'zovaniya k vladeniyu i veshchnomu pravu. M.: Statut, 2009. 698 s.
35.
Grimm D. D. Lektsii po dogme rimskogo prava / pod red., s predisl. V. A. Tomsinova. M.: Zertsalo, 2003. 495 c.
36.
Krasheninnikova E. A. Tsessiya i denuntsiatsiya // Yuridicheskie zapiski studencheskogo nauchnogo obshchestva: sb. st. / otv. red. M. V. Lushnikov. Yaroslavl': YarGU, 2002. Vyp. 2. 99 s.
37.
Strukgov V. G. O zaklade dolgovykh trebovanii (De pignore nominum). SPb.: Tipo-lit. R. Golike, 1890. XX, 250 s.
38.
Cherepakhin B. B. Pravopreemstvo po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu // Cherepakhin B. B. Trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. M.: Statut, 2001. 476 s. S. 307442.
39.
Krasnova T. S. Avtonomiya voli i ee ogranichenie v servitutnom prave: monogr. M.: M-Logos, 2020. 255 s.
40.
Pokrovskii I. A. Chastnaya zashchita obshchestvennykh interesov v Drevnem Rime // Drevnee pravo = Ivs antiqvvm. 1999. 2. S. 190200.
41.
Chel'tsov-Bebutov M. A. Polozhenie lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Yurid. izd-vo, 1948. Ch. 1. Proiskhozhdenie i razvitie rozysknogo protsessa vo Frantsii. 264 s.
42.
Licet Heli (X. 5.3.31) // Regesta Pontificum Romanorum Inde AB A. Post Christum Natum MCXCVIII Ad A. MCCCIV / A. Potthast (ed.). 2 vols. Vol. 1. Charleston, SC: Nabu Press, 2010. 922 pp. 888.
43.
Shprenger Ya., Institoris G. Molot ved'm / per. s lat. N. Tsvetkova; predisl. S. Lozinskogo. Saransk: Saran. f-l SP Nord, 1991. 352 s.
44.
Sheverdyaev S. N. Kontseptual'nye probely v sisteme Rossiiskogo antikorruptsionnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii. 2020. 1. S. 121131.
45.
G20 High-Level Principles for the Effective Protection of Whistleblowers [June 2829, 2019, Osaka, Japan]. 5 pp. URL: https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/G20/G20_2019_High-Level-Principles_Whistleblowers.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
46.
Konventsiya Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii protiv korruptsii: prinyata v g. N'yu-Iorke 31.10.2003 rezolyutsiei 58/4 na 51-m plenarnom zasedanii 58-i sessii General'noi Assamblei OON // Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov. 2006. 10. S. 754. URL: https://www.unodc.org/documents/brussels/UN_Convention_Against_Corruption.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
47.
Tsirin A. M. Pravovaya zashchita lits, soobshchayushchikh o faktakh korruptsii // Korruptsiya: sostoyanie protivodeistviya i napravleniya optimizatsii bor'by: [materialy vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 2728 yanv. 2015 g.)] / pod red. A. I. Dolgovoi. M.: Rossiiskaya kriminologicheskaya assotsiatsiya, 2015. 361 s. S. 9397.
48.
Whistle Blowing: The Report of the Conference on Professional Responsibility / R. Nader, P. J. Petkas, K. Blackwell (eds.). New York : Grossman Publishers, 1972. 302 pp.
49.
International Principles for Whistleblower Legislation: Best Practices for Laws to Protect Whistleblowers and Support Whistleblowing in the Public Interest / Transparency International; International Secretariat. Berlin, 2013. 12 pp. URL: https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2013_WhistleblowerPrinciples_EN.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
50.
Balán M. Competition by Denunciation: The Political Dynamics of Corruption Scandals in Argentina and Chile // Comparative Politics. 2011. Vol. 43, 4. Pp. 459478.
51.
Bergemann P. Judge Thy Neighbor: Denunciations in the Spanish Inquisition, Romanov Russia, and Nazi Germany. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 2019. 288 pp.
52.
Fitzpatrick S., Gellately R. Introduction to the Practices of Denunciation in Modern European History // Journal of Modern History. 1996. Vol. 68, 4. Pp. 747767.
53.
Kozlov V. A. Denunciation and Its Functions in Soviet Governance: A Study of Denunciations and Their Bureaucratic Handling from Soviet Police Archives, 19441953 // Journal of Modern History. 1996. Vol. 68, 4. Pp. 867898.
54.
Lease G. Denunciation as a Tool of Ecclesiastical Control: The Case of Roman Catholic Modernism // Journal of Modern History. 1996. Vol. 68, 4. Pp. 819830.
55.
Lucas C. The Theory and Practice of Denunciation in the French Revolution // Journal of Modern History. 1996. Vol. 68, 4. Pp. 768785.
56.
Williams B. Letters of Denunciation in the Lyon Region, 1940-1944 // Historical Social Research = Historische Sozialforschung. 2001. Vol. 26, 2/3 (96/97). Pp. 136152.
57.
Wood A. A lyttull worde ys tresson: Loyalty, Denunciation, and Popular Politics in Tudor England // Journal of British Studies. 2009. Vol. 48, 4. Pp. 837847.
58.
Trofimov E. V. Zakon SShA o zarubezhnoi korruptsionnoi praktike 1977 g. i mezhdunarodno-pravovye initsiativy po global'nomu protivodeistviyu korruptsii: problemy kriminalizatsii i administrirovaniya somnitel'nykh operatsii transnatsional'nykh korporatsii v 1970-kh gg. // Pravo i politika. 2019. 2. S. 3048.
59.
Trofimov E. V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye initsiativy 1970-kh gg. po global'nomu protivodeistviyu korruptsii: problemy kriminalizatsii i administrirovaniya somnitel'nykh operatsii transnatsional'nykh korporatsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. 2019. 1. S. 4566.
60.
Smirnov A. L. Poterpevshii ot prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovoe issledovanie: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-n/D, 2007. 242 s. S. 76.
61.
Chekurda E. A. Zarozhdenie i razvitie instituta professional'nykh obvinitelei v Drevnem Rime na rubezhe III vv. do n.e. // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2012. 11. S. 123127.
62.
Pravovaya zashchita lits, soobshchayushchikh o faktakh korruptsii: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie / V. Yu. Artemov, N. A. Golovanova, S. A. Kubantsev [i dr.]; otv. red. A. M. Tsirin, E. I. Spektor. M.: In-t zakonodatel'stva i sravnit. pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Ros. Federatsii, 2016. 144 s.
63.
Volosova N. Yu., Zhurkina O. V. K voprosu o programme zashchity razoblachitelei (informatorov) po delam korruptsionnoi napravlennosti // Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. T. 12. 5. S. 699710.
64.
An Act to amend title 31, United States Code, with respect to the fraudulent use of public property or money: Public Law 99-562, October 27, 1986 [S.1562] (False Claims Amendments Act of 1986) // 100 Stat. 3153.
65.
An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expiring provisions, and for other purposes: Public Law 109-432, December 20, 2006 [H.R. 6111] (Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006) // 120 Stat. 2922.
66.
An Act to promote the financial stability of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system, to end too big to fail, to protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts, to protect consumers from abusive financial services practices, and for other purposes : Public Law 111203, July 21, 2010 [H.R. 4173] (DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) // 124 Stat. 1376.
67.
An Act to amend title 5, United States Code, to strengthen the protections available to Federal employees against prohibited personnel practices, and for other purposes: Public Law 101-12, April 10, 1989 [S. 20] (Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989) // 103 Stat. 16.
68.
Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law // Official Journal of the European Union. 2019. L 305/17. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1937/oj (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
69.
Makarova O. V. Obespechenie bezopasnosti lits, sposobstvuyushchikh preduprezhdeniyu i raskrytiyu korruptsionnykh prestuplenii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2015. 7. S. 97105.
70.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2014)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of whistleblowers: adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 April 2014, at the 1198th meeting of the Ministers Deputies // Council of Europe [Website]. URL: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805c5ea5 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
71.
An Act to reform the civil service laws: Public Law 95-454, October 13, 1978 [S. 2640] (Civil Service Reform Act of 1978) // 92 Stat. 1111.
72.
Miceli M. P., Rehg M., Near Ja. P., Ryan K. C. Can Laws Protect Whistle-Blowers? Results of a Naturally Occurring Field Experiment // Work and Occupations. 1999. Vol. 26, 1. Pp. 129151.
73.
Tsirin A. M. Pravovaya zashchita lits, soobshchayushchikh o faktakh korruptsii // Korruptsiya: sostoyanie protivodeistviya i napravleniya optimizatsii bor'by: [materialy vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 2728 yanv. 2015 g.)] / pod red. A. I. Dolgovoi. M.: Rossiiskaya kriminologicheskaya assotsiatsiya, 2015. 361 s. S. 9397.
74.
An Act to protect individuals who make certain disclosures of information in the public interest; to allow such individuals to bring action in respect of victimisation; and for connected purposes : UK Public General Act 1998 c. 23 [2nd July 1998] (Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998) // legislation.gov.uk [Website] / by The National Archives on behalf of HM Government. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/23 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
75.
A Bill to provide protections for whistleblowers; to create offences relating to the treatment of whistleblowers and the handling of whistleblowing cases; to establish an independent body to protect whistleblowers and whistleblowing, in accordance with the public interest; to make provision for that body to set, monitor and enforce standards for the management of whistleblowing cases, to provide disclosure and advice services, to direct whistleblowing investigations and to order redress of detriment suffered by whistleblowers; to repeal the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998; and for connected purposes: Bill 0021 2019-21 (as introduced) 15 July 2020 (Public Interest Disclosure (Protection) Bill) // UK Parliament [Website]. URL: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0021/200021.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
76.
Ley 13964, de 10 de Dezembro de 2019, Aperfeiçoa a legislação penal e processual penal // http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2019-2022/2019/Lei/L13964.htm (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
77.
Ligj nr. 60/2016 datë 2.6.2016 Për sinjalizimin dhe mbrojtjen e sinjalizuesve // Fletorja Zyrtare e Republikës se Shqipërisë. 23.06.2016. Numri 115.
78.
Gus'kov A. Ya. Zarubezhnyi opyt uchastiya institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva v protivodeistvii korruptsii, na primere SShA, KNR i Finlyandii // Korruptsiya: sostoyanie protivodeistviya i napravleniya optimizatsii bor'by: [materialy vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 2728 yanv. 2015 g.)] / pod red. A. I. Dolgovoi. M.: Rossiiskaya kriminologicheskaya assotsiatsiya, 2015. 361 s. S. 311317.
79.
Spektor E. I., Seval'nev V. V. Voprosy pravovoi zashchity lits, soobshchayushchikh o faktakh korruptsii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2015. 4. S. 676683.
80.
Alford C. F. Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002. 192 pp.
81.
Vinten G. Whistleblowing: Corporate Help or Hindrance? // Management Decision. 1992. Vol. 30, 1. Pp. 4448.
82.
Batishcheva N. A. Ponyatie whistleblowers i problema zashchity informatorov o prestupleniyakh v evropeiskoi pravovoi kul'ture // Pravo i praktika. 2021. 1. S. 4044.
83.
ISO 37001:2016. Anti-Bribery Management Systems. URL: https://www.iso.org/iso-37001-anti-bribery-management.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
84.
Near Ja. P., Miceli M. P. Whistle-blowing: myth and reality // Journal of Management. 1996. Vol. 22, 3. Pp. 507526.
85.
Rothschild J., Miethe T. D. Whistle-Blower Disclosures and Management Retaliation: The Battle to Control Information About Organization Corruption // Work and Occupations. 1999. Vol. 26, 1. Pp. 107128.
86.
An Act to prevent and punish Frauds upon the Government of the United States: 37th Congress, Sess. III, Ch. LXVII, March 2, 1863 (False Claims Act) // 12 Stat. 696.
87.
Zakon Respubliki Koreya ot 29.02.2008 8878 O predotvrashchenii korruptsii, uchrezhdenii upravlenii komissii po bor'be s korruptsiei i grazhdanskim pravam i upravlenii eyu // Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission [Website]. URL: http://www.acrc.go.kr/en/data/1.0.ACRC%20Act.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
88.
Zakon Ukrani ot 17.10.2019 198-IX Pro vnesennya zmn do Zakonu Ukrani Pro zapobgannya korupts shchodo vikrivachv korupts // Vdomost Verkhovno Radi Ukrani. 2019. 50. St. 356.
89.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 04.02.2020 32 O vnesenii izmeneniya v postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30 dekabrya 2015 goda 1131 Ob utverzhdenii Pravil pooshchreniya lits, soobshchivshikh o fakte korruptsionnogo pravonarusheniya ili inym obrazom okazyvayushchikh sodeistvie v protivodeistvii korruptsii // Setevoe izdanie Internet resurs Tengrinews [Sait]. URL: https://tengrinews.kz/zakon/pravitelstvo-respubliki-kazahstan-premer-ministr-rk/natsionalnaya-bezopasnost/id-P2000000032/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
90.
Sidorenko E. L. Informirovanie o faktakh korruptsii: pravovye stimuly i garantii zashchity (zarubezhnyi opyt) // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2015. 5. S. 36.
91.
Helmer J. B., Jr. False Claims Act: Incentivizing Integrity for 150 Years for Rogues, Privateers, Parasites and Patriots // University of Cincinnati Law Review. 2013. Vol. 81, 4. Pp. 12611282.
92.
Brewer G. A., Selden S. C. Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1998. Vol. 8, 3. Pp. 413439.
93.
Artamonova I. Voprosy pravovogo statusa i zashchity zayavitelei o korruptsii (whistleblowers) : [04.04.2017] / NIU VShE. 31 s. URL: https://lap.hse.ru/data/2017/04/14/1168181358/%D0%90%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%98.%20%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%89%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%8F%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B8%CC%86%2004.04.17.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
94.
Bents'kii A. S. Pro krimnalzatsyu nepovdomlennya pro zlochin // Pravova nformatika. 2015. 1. S. 8995.
95.
Antikorruptsionnyi plan deistvii Gruppy dvadtsati: prilozhenie III k Deklaratsii sammita Gruppy dvadtsati, 12.11.2010 // URL: http://kremlin.ru/supplement/771 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
96.
Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 02.04.2013 309 O merakh po realizatsii otdel'nykh polozhenii Federal'nogo zakona O protivodeistvii korruptsii // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. 2013. 14. St. 1670.
97.
Tarasova G. V. Zashchita zayavitelei o korruptsii: proekt i real'nost' // Aktual'nye problemy nauchnogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennoi politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii v oblasti protivodeistviya korruptsii: sb. tr. po itogam II vseros. nauch. konf. (g. Ekaterinburg, 29 sent. 1 okt. 2015 g.) / otv. red. V. N. Rudenko. Ekaterinburg: In-t filosofii i prava UrO RAN, 2016. 416 s. S. 125131.
98.
Mintrud Rossii podgotovil zakonoproekt, napravlennyi na zashchitu lits, soobshchivshikh o korruptsionnom pravonarushenii: 13.02.2015 // Ministerstvo truda i sotsial'noi zashchity Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Sait]. URL: https://mintrud.gov.ru/labour/public-service/102 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
99.
Proekt federal'nogo zakona O zashchite lits, soobshchivshikh o korruptsionnykh pravonarusheniyakh, ot presledovaniya i ushchemleniya ikh prav i zakonnykh interesov so storony dolzhnostnykh lits, deistviya (bezdeistvie) kotorykh obzhaluyutsya: razmeshchen Mintrudom Rossii na federal'nom portale proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov [http://regulation.gov.ru, 13.02.2015] // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&cacheid=6E3232723C68FC37F38625C641FE5566&SORTTYPE=0&BASENODE=27-1&ts=PRpuzlSojKQlxGl91&base=PRJ&n=128655&rnd=7FC9A9472A7FD4310A89C31F68F66CDF#QsyuzlS483ukxaUk (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
100.
Proekt federal'nogo zakona 286313-7 O vnesenii izmeneniya v Federal'nyi zakon O protivodeistvii korruptsii v chasti zashchity lits, uvedomivshikh o korruptsionnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sistema obespecheniya zakonodatel'noi deyatel'nosti Gosudarstvennoi avtomatizirovannoi sistemy Zakonotvorchestvo [Sait]. URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/286313-7 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
101.
Proekt federal'nogo zakona 601000-7 O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v tselyakh sovershenstvovaniya gosudarstvennoi politiki v oblasti protivodeistviya korruptsii // Sistema obespecheniya zakonodatel'noi deyatel'nosti Gosudarstvennoi avtomatizirovannoi sistemy Zakonotvorchestvo [Sait]. URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/601000-7 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2021).
102.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 12.08.1995 144-FZ Ob operativno-rozysknoi deyatel'nosti // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. 1995. 33. St. 3349.
103.
Ismagilov R. A. Obespechenie bezopasnosti lits, sposobstvuyushchikh vyyavleniyu korruptsionnykh prestuplenii // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2016. 3. S. 133136.
104.
Suryanto T., Thalassinos E. L. Cultural Ethics and Consequences in Whistle-Blowing among Professional Accountants: An Empirical Analysis // Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2017. Vol. 12, 6. Pp. 17251731.
105.
Dungan J., Waytz A., Young L. The Psychology of Whistleblowing // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2015. Vol. 6. Pp. 129133.
106.
Miceli M. P., Near Ja. P. What Makes Whistle-Blowers Effective? Three Field Studies // Human Relations. 2002. Vol. 55, 4. Pp. 455479
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website