Статья 'Пределы применения принципа непосредственности в гражданском процессе' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Limits of application of the principle of immediacy in civil procedure

Ryzhkov Konstantin Sergeevich

PhD in Law

Senior Educator, the department of Civil Procedural Law, Russian Academy of Justice

454135, Russia, Chelyabinskaya oblast', g. Chelyabinsk, ul. Energetikov, 63

knrz2006@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2020.1.31230

Review date:

31-10-2019


Publish date:

05-02-2020


Abstract: The subject of this research is the principle of immediacy as one of the fundamental principles of civil procedure, defining the content of proving cases heard in the order established by the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The goal of this article consists in a thorough analysis of the application of principle of immediacy within the framework of proving, which is regulated by the norms of the civil procedural legislation. The relevance of this topic is substantiated by vast number of exceptions in application of the aforementioned procedural legal principle, including those set by the current legislation. This research employs such methods as analysis, systemic-structural, hermeneutic, and formal-legal. Based on the acquired results, the author determines a list instances in which the current legislation allows for the possibility of limiting the implementation of the principle of immediacy within the process of examination and assessment of evidence by the court. Analysis is also conducted into the limits of application of the principle of immediacy with regards to each individual case.


Keywords: court order, videoconferencing, principle of immediacy, court, means of proof, evidence, process of proof, copy, audio recording, video recording
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kolosova M.V. Printsip neposredstvennosti grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava : Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.15 : Saratov. 2004. 25 c.
2.
Zinchenko E.A. Sudebnaya vlast' i printsipy otpravleniya pravosudiya // Sudebnaya sistema i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo Rossii. K 150-letiyu Sudebnoi reformy: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. – 2015. – S. 28-31.
3.
Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal'nyi zakon ot 14 noyabrya 2002 g. № 138-FZ (red. ot 26.07.2019) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2002. № 46. st. 4532.
4.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 5 sentyabrya 2014 g. № 16-KG14-18 po delu № 2-1580/2013 https://sudact.ru/vsrf/doc/TZdRNWYwHsNr/?page =2&vsrf-judge=&vsrf-case_doc=&vsrf-txt=%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%8 1%D1% 80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C&vsrf-date_from=&vsrf-lawchunk info=&vsrf-date_to =&_=156974706 2126&snippet_pos=3480#snippet (data obrashcheniya: 31.10.2019).
5.
Voronov A.F. Ob obshchnosti soderzhaniya i tendentsiyakh razvitiya funktsional'nykh printsipov grazhdanskogo protsessa razlichnykh pravovykh sistem // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2010. №594. S. 7-34.
6.
Reshetnyak V.I. Videokonferentssvyaz' v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: problemy i perspektivy // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2012. №10. S. 11-14.
7.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.06.2008 № 11 «O podgotovke grazhdanskikh del k sudebnomu razbiratel'stvu». – Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2008. № 140. Dostup iz spravochno-poiskovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrashcheniya: 31.10.2019).
8.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 26 iyunya 2008 g. № 13 «O primenenii norm Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii pri rassmotrenii i razreshenii del v sude pervoi instantsii». Rossiiskaya gazeta. – 2008. – № 140. – Dostup iz spravochno-poiskovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus»(data obrashcheniya: 31.10.2019).
9.
Malykh E.G. Nekotorye problemy otsenki dostovernosti kopii dokumenta kak pis'mennogo dokazatel'stva v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2008. №9. S. 36-40.
10.
Khasanshin I.A. Protsessual'nye garantii realizatsii i zashchity prav uchastnikov arbitrazhnogo protsessa v stadii sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2014. №2. S. 72-110.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website