Статья 'О коррупциогенном статусе правоприменительных дискреционных полномочий ' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

On the Corruptogenic Status of Law-Enforcement Discretionary Powers

Valiev Rafail' Gazizullovich

PhD in Politics

Associate Professor of the Department of the Theory and History of State and Law at Kazan (Volga State) Federal University

420008, Russia, respublika Tatarstan, g. Kazan', ul. Krmlevskaya, 18, of. 305A

raf.val.111@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2018.12.28460

Review date:

16-12-2018


Publish date:

23-12-2018


Abstract.

The subject of the research is the adequacy of such markers of corruptogenic discretionary powers as the scope and definition of competence based on the 'be eligible for' formula established by the Guidlines on Anti-Corruption Expertise of Legal Acts and Draft Laws'. The use of the aforesaid markers in the expert activity creates a problem because expert's statement must designate the kind of way to eliminate corruptogenic factors that, in fact, must eliminate the possibility of actions of an actor. This creates the need to clarify the status of law-enforcement discretionary powers in terms of their legal nature. The methodological basis of the research is the formal law method and technical legal approach to the analysis of legal acts that underline the legal institutionalization of the anti-corruption expertise. The method of expert's statement modelling has proved to be useful for this research, too. The aforesaid research methodology has allowed receive the following research results. As part of the analysis of the legal nature of law-enforcement practice, the author has discovered the contradiction between the legal institutionalization of the corruptogenic status iof discretionary powers and their legal nature. In the course of the research the author has discovered patterns of the legal institutionalization of law enforcement discretionary powers and has found out that their legal nature is immanent to the essence of law enforcement practice. The researcher has also proved that such markers of the scope of discretionary powers as the absence and uncertainty of conditions or grounds for the enforcement decision-making process just as the definition of the competence based on the 'be eligible for ' formula do not fully relieve from corruption potential. The patterns described by the researcher raise questions about the absolute priority being given to the corruptogenic status of discretionary powers. To improve anti-corruption measures in the law-enforcement practice, the author underlines that it would be useful to shift the emphasis towards optimization of their application procedures. 

Keywords: anti-corruption expertise, corruption potential, discretionary powers, discretionary norms, discretion, law enforcement, corruption markers, corruption factors, regulatory legal acts, legal regulation
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Konventsiya OON protiv korruptsii ; prinyata rezolyutsiei 58/4 General'noi Assamblei ot 31 oktyabrya 2003 goda. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/corruption.shtml (Data obrashcheniya — 9.11.18 g.)
2.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 25 dekabrya 2008 goda N 273-FZ «O protivodeistvii korruptsii»: [c poslednimi izm. i dop. ot 30 oktyabrya 2018 g.] // Sistema GARANT: URL: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/12164203/paragraph/2769:1 (Data obrashcheniya — 10.11.18 g.)
3.
Federal'nyi zakonyi zakon N 172-FZ ot 17.07.2009 goda «Ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov» : [s poslednimi izm. i dop. ot 11 oktyabrya 2018 g.] // Sistema GARANT: URL: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/195958/paragraph/1494:3 (Data obrashcheniya — 10.11.18 g.)
4.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 26 fevralya 2010 goda N 96 «Ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov» : [s poslednimi izm. i dop. ot 10 iyulya 2017 g.] // Sistema GARANT : URL: http://base.garant.ru/197633/ (Data obrashcheniya — 10.11.18 g.)
5.
Ford, Ch. A. Judicial discretion in international jurisprudence: article 38 (1) (c) and "general principles of law" // Duke j. of comparative & intern. law.-Durham, 1995. Vol. 5, N 1. P. 35 — 86.
6.
Marfitsin, P. G. Ponyatie i znachenie usmotreniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve / Marfitsin P. G. // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2002. N 2. S. 38 — 45.
7.
Korablina, O. V. Pravoprimenitel'noe usmotrenie v sisteme rossiiskogo prava / Korablina O. V.; Astrakhan. Gos. un-t. Astrakhan': Izd vo Sorokin R. V., 2010. — 85 s.
8.
Kleandrov, M. I. Status sud'i: pravovoi i smezhnye komponenty / Kleandrov M. I.; pod red. M. M. Slavina. Moskva: Norma, 2008. — 256 s.
9.
Shagieva, R. V. Kontseptsiya pravovoi deyatel'nosti v sovremennom obshchestve / Shagieva R. V. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazansk. un — ta, 2005.— 312 s.
10.
Rimskii, V. Otsenivanie korruptsiogennosti norm zakonov i zakonoproektov : prezentatsiya / Vladimir Rimskii; Fond INDEM ; VIII Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya «MODERNIZATsIYa EKONOMIKI» Transkript. URL: http://www.myshared.ru/slide/614288/ (Data obrashcheniya — 1.11.18 g.)
11.
Valiev, R. G. Pravovaya deyatel'nost' v Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Valiev R. G. // Osnovnye kharakteristiki Rossiiskoi pravovoi deistvitel'nosti / pod nauch. red. Yu. S. Reshetova. Kazan': Kazan. un t, 2010. S. 107 — 124.
12.
Bratanovskii, S. N. Diskretsionnye polnomochiya kak faktor korruptsii v sisteme ispolnitel'noi vlasti / Bratanovskii S. N., Zelenov M.F. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 4. C. 311 — 315.DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.4.16725
13.
Bratanovskii S.N. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie: ponyatie i sotsial'naya sushchnost' //Vestnik EAAN. 2011. № 6. S. 6 – 15.
14.
Demin, A. V. Diskretsiya v nalogovom prave / Demin A. V. // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2017. Vyp. 35. S. 42 — 55.
15.
Prosandeeva, N. V. Protivodeistvie korruptsii: pravovye sistemy v istorii / Prosandeeva N. V. // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2014. № 2. S. 50 — 54.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website