Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

72 - !
. 72 DOI .
!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Tacit Admission in Arbitral Proceedings
Ilyasov Anvar Aidarovich

Post-graduate student, the department of Civil Law and Procedure, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation  

117218, Russia, gorod federal'nogo znacheniya Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. Bol'shaya Cheremushkinskaya, 34

anvar.ilyasov@gmail.com

 

 

Article was received:

17-09-2018


Review date:

19-09-2018


Abstract.

In his article Iliasov touches upon particular theoretical and practical issues and rules of tacit admission aimed at improving competiteveness in arbitral proceedings. He analyzes the provisions of Part 3.1 of Article 70 of Arbitral Procedural Code of the Russian Federation that allows the court to recognize circumstances the other party refers to in order to prove their requirements or complains in case these circumstances have not been contested or disputed or other proofs of their disagreement. The research methodology includes general research methods such as analysis, synthesis, generalisation, analogy and special research methods (formal law). As a result of the research, the author concludes that the aforesaid novella is an example of inconsistent changes of arbitral proceedings that may lead to the impairment of rights of participants. The practical importance of the research is that the results can be used to prepare legal acts in the field of the procedural law. 

Keywords: burden of proof, legal equality, adversarial system, judicial reform, court's powers, civil process, tacit admission, arbitral proceeding, evidence, Principles of civil process

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2019.1.27430

Publish date:

07-02-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Sudebnaya reforma i problemy razvitiya grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. M.: RAP, 2012. S. 641
2.
Kulakova V.Yu. Problemy teoreticheskoi obosnovannosti i prakticheskoi primenimosti pravila ch. 3.1 st. 70 APK RF //-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus.
3.
Internet-interv'yu s predsedatelem Pyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda Shevchenko Aleksandrom Semenovichem i nachal'nikom otdela analiza i obobshcheniya sudebnoi praktiki, zakonodatel'stva i statistiki Pyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda Soltamovoi N. S. Poslednie izmeneniya v Arbitrazhno-protsessual'nom kodekse RF// Rezhim dostupa: http://www.garant.ru/company/cooperation/gov/action/regional/290403/#ixzz5BnCwQwTK
4.
Filatova M.A. O zaimstvovaniyakh protsessual'nykh institutov v sovremennom rossiiskom prave (na primere protsessual'nykh sanktsii)// Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 12, dekabr' 2015 g.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus.
5.
Kontseptsiya edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii (odobrena resheniem Komiteta po grazhdanskomu, ugolovnomu, arbitrazhnomu i protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu GD FS RF ot 08.12.2014 124(1))-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus.
6.
Gurvich M.A. Izbrannye trudy. T. 2. Krasnodar, 2006. S. 477
7.
Yudin A. Molchanie-znak soglasiya? // EZh-Yurist. 2010. 41. S. 5-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus.
8.
Vystuplenie Sergun A.K. Protokol 8 Zasedaniya sektsii arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva Nauchno-konsul'tativnogo soveta pri Vysshem Arbitrazhnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii// Rezhim dostupa: http://www.arbitr.ru/_upimg/AC17CABAF3D92B45D7CFA1A7AFBA54E3_prot8.pdf Data obrashcheniya: 7 iyunya 2018 g.
9.
V Kontseptsii edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii, odobrennoi resheniem Komiteta po grazhdanskomu, ugolovnomu, arbitrazhnomu i protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu Gosudarstvennoi Dumy ot 8 dekabrya 2014 g. 124(1) predlagaetsya primenit' pravilo o molchalivom priznanii v grazhdanskom protsesse.
10.
Kontseptsiya edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa: predlozheniya Instituta zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii / A.V. Gabov, E.S. Ganicheva, M.E. Glazkova, V.M. Zhuikov, D.I. Kovtkov, L.F. Lesnitskaya, N.I. Marysheva, M.L. Shelyutto // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2015. 5. S. 15
11.
Molchanov V.V. Sudebnoe dokazyvanie v budushchem edinom Grazhdanskom protsessual'nom kodekse Rossiiskoi Federatsii.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus.
12.
Molchanov V.V. Osnovy teorii dokazatel'stv grazhdanskom protsessual'nom prave: Uch. Posobie. M. 2012. S. 207
13.
Vystuplenie Shvartsa M.Z. Protokol 8 Zasedaniya sektsii arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva Nauchno-konsul'tativnogo soveta pri Vysshem Arbitrazhnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii// Rezhim dostupa: http://www.arbitr.ru/_upimg/AC17CABAF3D92B45D7CFA1A7AFBA54E3_prot8.pdf Data obrashcheniya: 15 iyunya 2018 g.
14.
Tumanov D.A., Alekhina S.A. O nekotorykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2015. 3. S. 12-28.
15.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Omskoi oblasti ot 24.05.2012 po delu A46-12382/2012
16.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 15.10.2013 N 8127/13 po delu A46-12382/2012
17.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Omskoi oblasti ot 18.03.2014 po delu A46-12382/2012
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website