Статья 'Проблемы ограничения принципа неприкосновенности собственности на примере программы реновации жилищного фонда в г. Москве. ' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies

Restriction of the Principle of Inviolability of Onwership Based on the Example of the Housing Renovation Program in Moscow

Pozhidaev Vitaliy Evgenyevich

PhD in Law

Post-graduate student, the department of Civil Law and Proceedings, Moscow University for Industry and Finance "Synergy”

125190, Russia, gorod Moskva, g. Moscow, Leningradskii prospekt, 80 korpus G

Другие публикации этого автора




Review date:


Publish date:


Abstract: The subject of this article is the social relations that may arise as a result of the restricted principle of invoilability of ownership. The author analyzes the problem of ungrounded restrictions of the property rights based on the example of The Housing Renovation Program in Moscow. He focuses on such principles as the adequacy of restrictions and their correspondence to the public interest as well as the balance between private and public interests. The author of the article also pays attention to the constitutional grounds of inviolability of ownership and proportionality criterion for the legal restriction of property rights. Within the framework of this research, Pozhidaev has used general research methods including analogy, induction, deduction, and comparison. He has also applied the systems approach, formal law analysis and content analysis of the Federal Law on Renovation of July 1, 2017. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the Renovation Program and legal regulation of civil, land and city-planning relations have not become the matter of in-depth analysis so far due to the novelty of the issue. The author comes to the conclusion that the regulation set forth by the Law on Renovation partly violates the principles of proportionality and adequacy of property rights restriction and thus needs to be amended in order to restore the balance between private and public interests. 

Keywords: exemption of property, restrictive means, Civil law principles, public interest, right of property, property, Inviolability of ownership, renovation, demolition of emergency housing, civil law
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 N 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 05.12.1994, N 32, st. 3301.
Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993 // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 04.08.2014, N 31, st. 4398.
Saurin A.A. Pravo sobstvennosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovye predely realizatsii i ogranicheniya: monografiya. M.: Statut, 2014.
Povetkina E.L. Iz''yatie imushchestva dlya publichnykh nuzhd: tsivilisticheskie ustoi i sovremennye tendentsii // Zakon. 2014. №2.
Tot'ev K.Yu. Publichnyi interes v pravovoi doktrine i zakonodatel'stve // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 9.
Bolgova V.V. Pravovye sredstva obespecheniya zhilishchnykh prav grazhdan v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Vektor nauki TGU. 2014. №3.
Gladysheva protiv Rossii (Gladysheva v. Russia): Postanovlenie Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 06 dekabrya 2011 goda (zhaloba N 7097/10) [Elektronnyi resurs] // Rezhim dostupa: http://europeancourt.ru/tag/uvazhenie-zhilishha/ (data obrashcheniya 20.06.2018).
Federal'nyi zakon ot 26.12.1995 N 208-FZ Ob aktsionernykh obshchestvakh // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 01.01.1996, N 1, st. 1.
Sykes A. The Least Restrictive Means // The University of Chicago Law Review, winter, 2003, Vol. 70, №1.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website