Статья 'О понятии, признаках и формах административно-процессуального принуждения' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

On the concept, features and forms of administrative procedure enforcement

Chuklova Elena Valerievna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor at the Department of entrepreneurial and labour law of Togliatti State University

445041, Russia, Togliatti, ul. Gidrotekhnicheskaya, 9-141

elenachuklova@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.11.24152

Review date:

09-08-2020


Publish date:

04-12-2017


Abstract.

The research subject is the institution of administrative procedure enforcement. The author defines its concept, studies its features and forms. In the author’s opinion, administrative and procedure enforcement has the following forms: measures of procedural protection (including protection, responsibility and security measures) and injunctions. The author compares the forms of administrative procedure enforcement, points out their common features and peculiarities. As the common features, the author mentions public enforcement character, normative formalization, existence within a legal relationship; peculiarities consist in the reasons for use, content, reasons for immunity and exceptions. The study is based on the dialectical method of cognition of social phenomena and the related general scientific and specific methods: comparative-legal, formal-legal, functional, system and others. The author formulates conclusions about the concept of administrative procedure enforcement and existence of injunctions, which have different reasons for use, different content, reasons for immunity and exceptions. The article is a part of the research project of Russian Foundation for Basic Research No 16-33-00017 “Complex intersectoral institution of legal responsibility: concept, structure, interrelations and place in the system of law”. 

Keywords: measures of procedural responsibility, protection measures, measures, procedure responsibility, protection of a right, procedure enforcement, public enforcement, administrative procedure enforcement, Institution of law, security measures
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Tolmacheva I.I. Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskoi protsessual'noi otvetstvennosti // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2016. N 8. S. 3-7.
2.
Rossinskii S.B. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo kak mera ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2017. N 3. S. 16-20.
3.
Kuzovkov V.V. O protsessual'nom prinuzhdenii v sfere publichnykh finansov // "Finansovoe pravo", 2007, N 9. S. 54.
4.
Sm.: Ardashkin V.D. O prinuzhdenii po sovetskomu pravu // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1970. – № 7. – S. 33-40.
5.
Vershinina S.I. O yuridicheskoi prirode, ponyatii i sisteme ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2016. № 5. S. 90-98.
6.
Chuklova E.V. Ponyatie, osnovaniya i vidy protsessual'noi otvetstvennosti: teoreticheskii aspekt. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Samara, 2009. – 57.
7.
Berg L.N. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya klassifikatsii pravovogo vozdeistviya // Sovremennoe pravo. 2016. N 1. S. 11-16.
8.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 21.01.2016 N 1 "O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya zakonodatel'stva o vozmeshchenii izderzhek, svyazannykh s rassmotreniem dela" // "Rossiiskaya gazeta", N 43, 01.03.2016.
9.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 06.12.2016 N DK15-71(2). Dokument opublikovan ne byl // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus».
10.
Vershinina S.I. O normakh protsessual'nogo prava, ikh strukture i soderzhanii // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2017. № 3. S. 34-50
11.
Ryzhakov A.P. Zhaloby na sledovatelya (doznavatelya) // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus. 2016. S. 76.
12.
Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' (teoreticheskie voprosy). – Krasnoyarsk, 1985.
13.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Stavropol'skogo kraevogo suda ot 20.02.2015 po delu N 33-883/2015.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website