Статья 'Сравнительное правоведение в античном философско-правовом мире: социокультурный и правоментальный анализ ' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies

Comparative Law in the Classical Ancient Philosophy and Law: Sociocultural and Legal Mental Analysis

Mordovtsev Andrei Yur'evich

Doctor of Law

Professor, the department of Theory and History of Russian and Foreign Law, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service

690014, Russia, Primorskii Krai oblast', g. Vladivostok, ul. Gogolya, 41, aud. 5501

Другие публикации этого автора

Mordovtseva Tat'yana Vasil'evna

Professor of the Department of Humanities at Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics

347935, Russia, Rostovskaya oblast', g. Taganrog, ul. Engel'sa, 188

Mamychev Aleksei Yur'evich

Professor, the department of Theory and History of Russian and Foreign Law, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service

690014, Russia, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, Gogolya Street 41, office #5501

Другие публикации этого автора




Review date:


Publish date:


Abstract: The subject of this research is the sources of formation of a subject domain as well as conceptual and methodological bases of comparative law in ancient philosophical and legal discourse. The authors address to the heritage of Ancient Greek and Ancient Roman philosophy of law, reveal specifics of antique legal thinking, offer sociocultural and mental assessment of its contents and orientation of development of the latter. They emphasize the importance of the Ancient comparative and legal discourse for the formation and development of legislative, law-enforcement and right interpretative practice of the past and the present. In their research the authors have used historical and legal and comparative and legal methods. As the methodological strategy of the research they have used the discourse approach offered by M. Foucault who insisited that the appeal to the research of various sociocultural phenomena including the state and legal phenomena and processes should be realized in terms of of acting social practices that influence the essence of the latter. For these research objectives, the authors have described a number of social practices that predetermined the development of both public, and hidden comparative and legal discourses which defined formations and development of the classical Ancient philosophy and law. In their research the authors have described particular features of the formation and development of a subject domain and methodlogical grounds of of comparative law in Ancient socio-cultural and political and legal scenarios. They have proved that Greek and Roman concepts of the political and legal relaities, their forms and means of constructing legal terms and practical tools became a substantive beginning and course of an original and unique European (and later EuroAmerican) legal universum.

Keywords: legal thinking, intuitivism, social practices, philosophy of law, law, comparative law, society, antiquity, legal systems, evolution
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Weiis K. Griechiesches Privatrecht auf Rechtsvercleichender Grundlage.Berlin,1923. S. 7-9.
Fuko M. Volya k istine. Po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. M., 1996. 423 c.
Rozin V.M. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie. Almaty, 2000. 294 c.
Mordovtsev A.Yu., Mamychev A.Yu. Pravovoi mentalitet kak osnovanie issledovaniya natsional'nogo prava i publichno-vlastnoi organizatsii v XXI veke // Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie. 2016. T. № 4 (17). S. 444-447.
Mamychev A.Yu. «Postdistsiplinarnyi diskurs» arkhetipicheskikh issledovanii: postanovka problemy //Territoriya novykh vozmozhnostei. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa. 2017. T. 9. № 1 (36). S. 18-25.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M., 1990. 524 s.
Reale Dzh., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dnei. I.Antichnost'. SPb., 1994. 579 c.
Platon. Sochineniya v 3-kh tomakh. M., 1972. T. 3. Ch.2. 688 c.
Chirkin V.E. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie. M. 2012. 336 s.
Marchenko M.N. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie. M., 2015. 560 s.
Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. M., 1983. 830 s.
Tsvaigert K., Ketts Kh. Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava: v 2-t. – Tom 1. Osnovy. M., 2000. 480 s.
Istoriya gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnykh stran. Ch. II. Kn.1 / Sost. prof. I.A. Krasheninnikova. M., 2014. 624 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website