Статья 'Пересмотр судебных решений в период действия УПК РСФСР 1923 г.' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Review of judicial decisions according to the 1923 Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR

Panokin Aleksandr Mikhailovich

PhD in Law

Lawyer, Moscow Collegium of Advocates "Advocacy Partnership"; Docent, the department of Criminal Procedural Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University

125993, Russia, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Street 9

ampanokin@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.10.23817

Review date:

08-08-2017


Publish date:

15-10-2017


Abstract.

The article studies the peculiarities of review of judicial decisions according to the 1923 Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR. The author studies the established forms of review of judicial decisions in their interconnection with the peculiarities of organization of the judiciary responsible for effective monitoring of judicial acts. The author notes the similarities and differences between the Soviet cassation, proceedings in the order of supervision and reopening cases in view of newly discovered facts. The author considers the topical questions of review of facts of a criminal case in court of review in the context of direct prohibition against reviewing the essence of a judicial decision. The author notes limited cognitive abilities of a cassation court and the related problems of proving in reviewing judicial decisions, which haven’t yet become effective in law. The article analyzes general reasons for reviewing judicial decisions in the order of cassation or supervision, which allow for repeated review of the facts. The author defines the peculiarities of review of judicial decisions, which have become effective in law, determined by the initiation of such a review and a special position of a prosecutor in reopening cases in view of newly discovered facts. The research subject of the article determines the use of a set of general scientific (system analysis, empirical material description, comparison and generalization) and specific (historical-legal, law enforcement practice generalization and technical-legal) methods. The author concludes about the range of significant institutional contradictions between legislative regulation of the system of review of judicial decisions according to the 1923 Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR and law-enforcement practice. The revealed contradictions made the legislator look for their settlement, and criminal procedural law scholars – substantiate the Soviet doctrine of review if judicial decisions. 

Keywords: 1923 Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR, reformatio in pejus, review procedure, private appeal, reopening of cases, review proceedings , Soviet court of cassation, review of judicial decisions , judicial system, criminal proceeding
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bertovskii L. V., Nichiporenko A. A. Vozbuzhdenie nadzornogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu resheniem upolnomochennogo dolzhnostnogo litsa v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitel'no-pravovoi analiz // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2016. № 9. S. 60-64.
2.
Galkin A. Kassatsionnyi sud // Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoi yustitsii. 1923. 27 dekabrya (№ 50). S. 1157-1158.
3.
Grodzinskii M. M. Kassatsionnoe i nadzornoe proizvodstvo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. 2-e izd. M., 1953. 231 S.
4.
Kozhevnikov M. V. Istoriya sovetskogo suda, 1917-1956. M., 1957. 386 S.
5.
Kutsova E. F. Sovetskaya kassatsiya kak garantiya zakonnosti v pravosudii. M., 1957. 228 S.
6.
Mukhin I. I. Kassatsionnoe obzhalovanie, oprotestovanie i peresmotr prigovorov. M., 1956. 200 S.
7.
Nichiporenko T. Yu. Edinolichnoe rassmotrenie sud'ei ugolovnykh del. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1998. 308 S.
8.
Panokin A. M. Nespravedlivost' prigovora kak osnovanie otmeny ili izmeneniya sudebnogo resheniya, ne vstupivshego v zakonnuyu silu // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal. 2016. № 3 (26). S. 103-109.
9.
Rakhunov R. D. Peresmotr prigovorov i opredelenii v prezidiumakh sudov. M., 1956. 131 S.
10.
Rivlin A. L. Peresmotr prigovorov v SSSR. M., 1958. 312 S.
11.
Sbornik deistvuyushchikh raz''yasnenii Verkhovnogo Suda RSFSR, izdannykh za vremya s 1923 g. do 01 yanvarya 1929 g. M., 1930. 367 S.
12.
Simson S. K voprosu ob uproshchenii kassatsionnogo proizvodstva // Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoi yustitsii. 1923. 11 oktyabrya (№ 40). S. 913-914.
13.
Solomon P. Sovetskaya yustitsiya pri Staline. 2-e izd. M., 2008. 464 S.
14.
Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M., 1958. 704 S.
15.
Tager A. S. Kassatsionnoe obzhalovanie sudebnykh prigovorov (Kommentarii k stat'yam 344-350, 409-426, 400-408, 434-439 Ugolovno-Protsessual'nogo Kodeksa) // Ugolovno-Protsessual'nyi Kodeks R. S. F. S. R. Prakticheskii kommentarii. 2-e izd. M., 1924. 134 S.
16.
Chel'tsov M. A. Sovetskii ugolovnyi protsess. 4-e izd. M., 1962. 504 S
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website