Статья 'Основные начала апелляционного производства в уголовном процессе' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Fundamental Principles of Appeal in Criminal Proceedings

Panokin Aleksandr Mikhailovich

PhD in Law

Lawyer, Moscow Collegium of Advocates "Advocacy Partnership"; Docent, the department of Criminal Procedural Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University

125993, Russia, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Street 9

ampanokin@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.8.23816

Review date:

09-08-2020


Publish date:

19-08-2017


Abstract.

In the article, the author analyses the notion, definition and the classification of the fundamental principles of appeal proceedings. The author proposes a retrospective analysis of pre-revolutionary, Soviet and modern Russian legal doctrines, which define in different ways the fundamental principles of the control and review stages of criminal procedure. The author reveals the correlation between the fundamental principles of appeal proceedings and the principles of criminal procedure and the context of general court proceedings.The author considers the peculiarities of implementation of a theoretical construct of the fundamental principles of revision of decisions of court, which haven’t yet become effective in law. This construct had been formalized in Russian legal doctrine, legislation and law enforcement practice in different periods of development of Russian criminal procedure. The importance of the legal standing of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, as well as of the interpretation of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and of the court rulings that give substance to the fundamental principles of the appeal procedure is emphasized. The author analyzes particular fundamental principles of the appeal proceedings in criminal procedure. The subject of the article determines the application of a number of general scientific methods (system analysis, description of empiric material, comparison and generalization), and special methods (historic and legal analysis, generalization of the law enforcement practice and technical and legal analysis). Study of the essence of the fundamental principles of appeal proceedings allowes the author to conclude that appeal is the main method of revision of decisions of court. In this regard, the author proposes certain areas of reforming the revision of decisions of court, which haven't yet become ef fective in law, consisting in a more consistent implementation of fundamental principles of appeal proceedings.

Keywords: instance structure, reformatio in pejus, revision proceedings, verification of validity, verification of legality, right of appeal, fundamental principles, appeal, binding character of court rulings, criminal proceeding
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Vilkova T. Yu. Printsipy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i obshchie usloviya sudebnogo razbiratel'stva, kharakterizuyushchie deyatel'nost' suda // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2017. № 1. S. 34-36.
2.
Grodzinskii M. M. Kassatsionnoe i nadzornoe proizvodstvo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. 2-e izd. M., 1953. 231 S.
3.
Davydov N. V. Neskol'ko lektsii po ugolovnomu protsessu. 2-e izd. M., 1909. 105 S.
4.
Dukhovskoi M. V. Russkii ugolovnyi protsess. M., 1910. 448 S.
5.
Krylenko N. V. Sud i pravo v SSSR. Chast' vtoraya. Osnovy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Soyuza SSR i soyuznykh respublik. M., 1928. 158 S.
6.
Kudryavtseva A. V., Smirnov V. P. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. M., 2013. 216 S.
7.
Kutsova E. F. Sovetskaya kassatsiya kak garantiya zakonnosti v pravosudii. M., 1957. 228 S.
8.
Mirles A. Kratkii kurs russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. 2-e izd. Kiev, 1912. 104 S.
9.
Muratova N. G. Sistema sudebnogo kontrolya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: voprosy teorii, zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya i praktiki. Dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Kazan', 2004. 595 S.
10.
Mukhin I. I. Kassatsionnoe obzhalovanie, oprotestovanie i peresmotr prigovorov. M., 1956. 200 S.
11.
Nichiporenko A. A. Ogranicheniya na sudebnoe obzhalovanie otdel'nykh vidov reshenii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. № 2. S. 118-122.
12.
Panicheva A. Yavlyaetsya li peresmotr ugolovnykh del vo 2-i instantsii apellyatsionnym? // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2015. № 4. S. 100-104.
13.
Perlov I. D. Kassatsionnoe proizvodstvo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. M., 1968. 396 S.
14.
Poznyshev S. V. Elementarnyi uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. 2-e izd. M., 2016. 344 S.
15.
Postovskii K. Z. K voprosu ob apellyatsii v ugolovnom protsesse // Zhurnal Ministerstva Yustitsii. 1896. № 2. S. 158-171.
16.
Potapov V. D. Osnovnye nachala proverki sudebnykh reshenii v kontrol'no-proverochnykh stadiyakh i proizvodstvakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii. M., 2012. 376 S.
17.
Rivlin A. L. Peresmotr prigovorov v SSSR. M., 1958. 312 S.
18.
Sbornik deistvuyushchikh raz''yasnenii Verkhovnogo Suda RSFSR, izdannykh za vremya s 1923 g. do 01 yanvarya 1929 g. M., 1930. 367 S.
19.
Sluchevskii V. K. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Ch. II: Sudoproizvodstvo. M., 2008. 488 S.
20.
Solov'eva N. A., Trishina N. T. Yuridiko-fakticheskaya proverka prigovora v apellyatsionnom proizvodstve. M., 2013. 184 S.
21.
Strogovich M. S. Proverka zakonnosti i obosnovannosti sudebnykh prigovorov. M., 1956. 319 S.
22.
Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii // red.: I. L. Petrukhin. 2-e izd. M., 2007. 672 S.
23.
Foinitskii I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. V 2 t. T. II. SPb., 1996. 606 S.
24.
Chebyshev-Dmitriev A. Russkoe ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo po Sudebnym Ustavam 20 noyabrya 1864 g. SPb., 1875. 756 S.
25.
Chel'tsov (Chel'tsov-Bebutov) M. A. Izbrannoe. T. 2. M., 2017. 720 S.
26.
Chel'tsov M. A. Sovetskii ugolovnyi protsess. 4-e izd. M., 1962. 504 S.
27.
Chel'tsov-Bebutov M. A. Razvitie instituta obzhalovaniya i peresmotra prigovorov v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse // Uchenye zapiski Vsesoyuznogo yuridicheskogo zaochnogo instituta. 1948. S. 103-115.
28.
Chervotkin A. S. Apellyatsiya i kassatsiya: posobie dlya sudei. M., 2013. 336 S
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website