по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

One More Argument Against a Stage of Initiation of Legal Proceedings
Afanas'ev Aleksei Yur'evich

PhD in Law

Adjunct at Nizhni Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

603950, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Ankudinovskoe Shosse, 3

afanasev_alexey@bk.ru
Repin Maksim Evgen'evich

head of the duty shift at Police Department No. 5 of the Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Nizhni Novgorod

603001, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Nizhnevolzhskaya Nab., 12

me_repin@mail.ru

Article was received:

31-05-2017


Review date:

04-06-2017


Abstract.

Today the stage of initiation of legal proceedings is in extremely disputable state. A considerable part of representatives of criminal procedure science and practicians declare need of revision of a role and the place of this stage for criminal trial up to her elimination. At the same time in justification of the position various authors adduce a set of arguments. In this article a number of such provisions acting from the author's point of view essential in a question of an exception of the analyzed stage of criminal trial are reflected. Besides, by the author it is established that the raised korruptsiogennost of the specified procedure proceeding from the dispositive provision of the p. 2 of Art. 140 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation acts as one of the main bases for elimination of a stage of initiation of legal proceedings. Definition of degree of corruption risk of this norm and in general the criminal procedure decision on excitement (about refusal in excitement) criminal case has become possible thanks to a method of the statistical multidimensional analysis, namely cluster analysis. In addition, in article the group general scientific and specially methods of scientific knowledge is used. As a result of a research taking into account foreign experience of reforming of the criminal procedure legislation and domestic developments in the field of improvement of pre-judicial production it was offered to exclude a stage of initiation of legal proceedings from criminal trial and the related norms from the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, thereby having presented option of the beginning of pre-judicial production from the moment of registration of the message on a crime.

Keywords: investigator, investigative actions, cluster analysis, legal-linguistic uncertainty, corruptogenic factor, corruption risk, stages of criminal trial, Initiation of legal proceedings, criminal procedure decision, message on a crime

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2018.3.23180

Publish date:

29-03-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Gavrilov B. Ya. Realii i mify vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2010. № 2. S. 7–10.
2.
Orlov Yu. K. Vozmozhno li proizvodstvo sudebnoi ekspertizy v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela? // Zakonnost'. 2003. № 3. S. 20–21.
3.
Rossiiskii sledovatel': prizvanie, professiya, povsednevnost': monografiya / K. Titaev, M. Shklyaruk. M., 2016. 191 s.
4.
Karyakin E. A. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: «za» i «protiv» // Sovremennoe pravo. 2004. № 12. URL: https://www.sovremennoepravo.ru/m/articles/view/Stadiya-vozbuzhdeniya-ugolovnogo-dela-za-i-protiv (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2017)
5.
Volodina L. M. Mekhanizm zashchity prav lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse. Tyumen', 1999. 171 s.
6.
Aleksandrov A. S., Grachev S. A. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: likvidirovat' nel'zya ostavit' // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika. 2015. № 1. S. 101–108.
7.
Davletov A. A., Kravchuk L. A. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela – obyazatel'nyi etap sovremennogo otechestvennogo ugolovnogo protsessa // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2010. № 6. S. 114–120.
8.
Afanas'ev A. Yu. Korruptsionnye riski dokazatel'stvennogo prava v ugolovnom protsesse (dosudebnoe proizvodstvo): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2016. 279 s.
9.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 17 iyulya 2009 g. № 172-FZ «Ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov» // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2009. № 4957.
10.
URL: https://www.ridus.ru/news/168214 (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2017).
11.
URL: https://07.mvd.ru/news/item/7158930/ (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2017).
12.
URL: http://www.newsru.com/crime/16Oct2014/bribe2skrframenki.html (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2017).
13.
Gavrilov B. Ya. Sovremennoe ugolovno–protsessual'noe zakonodatel'stvo i realii ego pravoprimeneniya // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2010. № 15. S. 17–20.
14.
Doktrinal'naya model' ugolovno-protsessual'nogo dokazatel'stvennogo prava Rossiiskoi Federatsii i kommentarii k nei / Pod red. A. S. Aleksandrova. M., 2015. 304 s.
15.
Gir'ko S. I. O nekotorykh problemnykh voprosakh protsessual'noi reglamentatsii uskorennogo dosudebnogo proizvodstva // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2010. № 15. S. 14–16.
16.
Derishev Yu. V. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo – relikt «sotsialisticheskoi zakonnosti» // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2003. № 8. S. 34–36.
17.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Ukrainy ot 13 aprelya 2012 g. № 4651-5. URL: http://kodeksy.com.ua/ka/upku-2012/statja-215.htm (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2017).
18.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Gruzii ot 9 oktyabrya 2009 g. № 1772-Ps // Zakonodatel'nyi vestnik Gruzii. URL: https://matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/download/90034/54/ru/pdf (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2017).
19.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Estonii ot 12 fevralya 2003 goda. URL: http://zakon24.ee/ugolovno-processualnyj-kodeks/ (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2017).
20.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 10 iyulya 2014 goda. URL: http://medialaw.asia/posts/10-07-2014/83305.html (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2017)
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website