Статья 'Соглашения об устранении или ограничении ответственности за умышленное нарушение обязательств: теория и правоприменительная практика' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Agreements on responsibility elimination or limitation for intentional breach of obligations: theory and law enforcement practice

Zimneva Svetlana Viktorovna

PhD in Law

Docent, the department of Civil Law and Procedure, Tyumen State University

625003, Russia, g. Tyumen', ul. Volodarskogo, 6

swk1@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2017.3.21760

Review date:

04-08-2020


Publish date:

16-03-2017


Abstract.

The research subject includes the problems of conclusion and delivery of agreements on civil responsibility elimination or limitation. The author considers the legal nature and the conditions of conclusion of such agreements. Special attention is paid to the limits of terms of agreement on elimination or limitation of responsibility in accordance with the freedom of contracting principle. In order to reveal the essence of agreements on elimination or limitation of responsibility for intentional breach of obligations and to detect the factors conditioning the nullity of an agreement, the author analyzes the judicial practice of dealing with disputes deriving from agreements. The author applies general scientific and special research methods: formal logical, comparative-legal and technical legal methods. The author concludes that civil legislation doesn’t define the form of guilt, doesn’t formalize the signs of criminal intent or negligence. These circumstances complicate application of clause 4 article 401 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The author formulates the conditions taken into account by courts considering nullity of agreements on elimination or limitation of responsibility. The author formulates the proposals for the purpose of judicial practice improvement. 

Keywords: exclusion of liability, agreement, civil responsibility, guilt, freedom of contract, negligence, breach of obligation, criminal intent, indemnification, limitation of responsibility
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' pervaya) ot 30 noyabrya 1994 g. № 51-FZ (red. ot 07.02.2017) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 1994. № 32. St. 3301.
2.
Dzyuba I.A. Predely vozmozhnostei storon po ustanovleniyu v dogovore uslovii ob ogranichenii i osvobozhdenii ot otvetstvennosti // Pravo i ekonomika. 2003. № 8. S. 45-50.
3.
Krasheninnikov E.A. Usloviya funktsionirovaniya i granitsy chastnoi avtonomii // Vestnik Vyshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2013. № 9. S. 4-20.
4.
Ogneva K.O. Isklyuchenie i osvobozhdenie ot otvetstvennosti za narushenie dogovora: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. M., 2012. 26 s.
5.
Bogdanov D.V. Ponyatie i yuridicheskaya priroda osvobozhdeniya ot grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti i ee isklyucheniya // Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2012. № 1. S. 77-79.
6.
Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Azbukovnik, 1997. 944 s.
7.
Slovar' russkikh sinonimov. URL: http://jeck.ru/tools/SynonymsDictionary/ustranenie.
8.
Medvedev S.V. Osvobozhdenie ot yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti v rossiiskom gosudarstve: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. N. Novgorod, 2005. 161 s.
9.
Tikhonenko I.N. Osnovaniya osvobozhdeniya ot yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. Moskva, 1995. 129 s.
10.
Bogdanov D.E. Dogovornye usloviya ob ogranichenii ili isklyuchenii otvetstvennosti v rossiiskom i zarubezhnom prave // Vestnik MGOU. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya. 2015. № 4. S. 58-66.
11.
Skobeleva I.A. Usloviya dogovorov ob ogranichenii i isklyuchenii otvetstvennosti: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 Moskva, 2003. 229 s.
12.
McKendrick E. Contract Law: 7-th edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. P.
13.
Bogdanov D.V. Sootnoshenie osvobozhdeniya ot grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti so smezhnymi ponyatiyami // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2011. № 2. S. 91-97.
14.
Rozina S.V. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. Moskva, 2006. 142 s.
15.
Kamenkov V.S., Kamenkov A.V. Osnovaniya osvobozhdeniya ot grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti // Byulleten' notarial'noi praktiki. 2007. № 4. S. 20-28.
16.
Gavze F. I. Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo (obshchie polozheniya). Minsk: izd. BGU im. V. I. Lenina, 1968. 128 s.
17.
Bogdanov D.E. Problema formirovaniya dogovornoi spravedlivosti i spravedlivoi otvetstvennosti za neispolnenie dogovora // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2012. № 3. S. 12-20.
18.
Yudina S. Ogranichenie otvetstvennosti: «svoboda dogovora» i «ravnopravie storon» // Yurist predpriyatiya v voprosakh i otvetakh. 2013. № 9. S. 13-18.
19.
O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozhenii Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie obyazatel'stv: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2016 № 7 // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2016. № 70.
20.
Butenko E. V. Vina v narushenii dogovornykh obyazatel'stv: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. Krasnodar, 2002. 198 c.
21.
Dubovichenko S. V. Volevye momenty umysla // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva. 2010. № 73 S. 83-93.
22.
Chukreev A. A. Sub''ektivnye usloviya primeneniya sanktsii grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva o predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. Tyumen', 2003. 252 s.
23.
Chukreev A.A. Sub''ektivnye usloviya primeneniya sanktsii grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva o predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. Tyumen', 2003. 24 s.
24.
Braginskii M. I., Vitryanskii V.V. Dogovornoe pravo: Obshchie polozheniya. M.: Statut, 2003. 848 s.
25.
Grazhdanskoe pravo. Uchebnik. V 3-kh chastyakh. Ch. 1. / Pod red. Sergeeva A.P., Tolstogo Yu.K. M.: Prospekt, 2005. 765 s.
26.
Korshunova N.P. Obstoyatel'stva, osvobozhdayushchie ot otvetstvennosti za narushenie dogovora: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. Moskva: RGV, 2007. 273 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website