по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Comparative study of administrative and criminal responsibility of a cadastral engineer
Dvortsov Vadim Evgenievich

Judge Assistant at the town court of Mineral'nye Vody, Stavropol region

357203, Russia, Stavropol region, Mineral'nye Vody, pr. K. Marksa, 58

vadim.dvortsov@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The Criminal Code and the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation contain many provisions, establishing responsibility for related, and sometimes even similar, deeds. The research object is administrative responsibility of a cadastral engineer for plotting of the knowingly false information on a delimitation or technical plan, or its inclusion in the inspection report, land delimitation project or a survey map, or for the forgery of records, which these documents are based on, and criminal responsibility for such actions in case they caused significant damage to citizens, organizations or the state. The research subject is administrative and criminal responsibility of a cadastral engineer for the offence in cadastral activity and the practice of its implementation. The research methodology is based on the comparative-analytical method. The author applies various general and specific research methods: formal-logical, system, the principle of inseparability of method and truth, analysis and synthesis. The conducted research is the first and the only complex study of the possibility of imposition of administrative and criminal responsibility on a cadastral engineer. The article contains an unconventional analysis of objective and subjective features of the offences under consideration, enshrined in the part 4, article 14.35 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and the crime, described in the article 170.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author assesses the effectiveness of the established measures of administrative and criminal responsibility, considers the issues of qualification of offences and crimes, notes the problems of responsibility implementation and offers significant changes to the legislation. 

Keywords: Cadastral activities, Criminal responsibility, Administrative Responsibility, Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federa, Cadastral engineer, Guilt, Knowingly false information, Forgery of documents, punishment

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2016.12.2118

Article was received:

30-11-2016


Review date:

01-12-2016


Publish date:

08-01-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Golovko R.V. Razgranichenie administrativnoi i ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti po rossiiskomu pravu // Lex russica. 2016. № 1. S. 140.
2.
Golovko L.V. Sootnoshenie ugolovnykh prestuplenii i administrativnykh pravonarushenii v kontekste kontseptsii criminal matter (ugolovnoi sfery) // Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie. 2013. № 1. S. 87.
3.
Esakov G.A. Ot administrativnykh pravonarushenii k ugolovnym prostupkam, ili o sushchestvovanii ugolovnogo prava v «shirokom» smysle // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal. 2013. № 1. S. 40-45.
4.
Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (red. ot 06.07.2016 g.) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 03.10.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus.
5.
Krasnosel'skikh I.M. Administrativnoe pravo kak sposob vliyaniya na profilaktiku prestuplenii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 2. S. 143.
6.
Kuznetsov A.P., Makareiko N.V. Sootnoshenie diskvalifikatsii i lisheniya prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoi deyatel'nost'yu // Yurist. 2005. № 2. C. 76.
7.
Kupirova Ch.Sh. Roznichnaya prodazha nesovershennoletnim alkogol'noi produktsii: zakon i problemy ego primeneniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika. 2014. № 2. S. 122.
8.
Malinovskii A.A. Kriticheskie razmyshleniya o kontseptsii ugolovnogo prava v «shirokom» smysle // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2013. № 2. S. 175.
9.
Postanovlenie Vladimirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 30.06.2016 g. № 4a-161/2016 / IP «Konsul'tant Plyus».
10.
Sych V.K. Nekotorye voprosy sovremennogo sostoyaniya Rossiiskoi doktriny ugolovnoi politiki i perspektivy ee razvitiya // Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta. 2016. № 2 (27) / 2016. S. 90-92.
11.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (s izm. i dop. po sostoyaniyu na 06.07.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant plyus.
12.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 13.07.2015 g. № 228-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii» / Konsul'tant Plyus.
13.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 24.07.2007 g. № 221-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016 g.) «O gosudarstvennom kadastre nedvizhimosti» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 03.10.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website