по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Agencies, responsible for the consideration of individual industrial disputes, whose decisions are guaranteed by the financial responsibility of employers
Savin Viktor Tikhonovich

PhD in Law

Professor at the Department of Land, Labor and Environmental Law of Kuban State Agricultural University 

350044, Russia, Krasnodarskii Krai krai, g. Krasnodar, ul. Kalinina, 13, kab. 417

svt.2002@mail.ru

Article was received:

11-11-2016


Review date:

15-11-2016


Abstract.

The research subject is a poorly studied problem of agencies, making decisions about the reemployment of workers. The non-observance of these decisions is considered as a reason for the financial responsibility of an employer, provided by the paragraph 3, article 234 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. The author gives special attention to the agencies, established by federal laws, defining the peculiarities of consideration of individual industrial disputes of certain categories of workers, which differ from jurisdictional agencies and, therefore, can’t consider industrial disputes according to the procedure, established in the chapter 60 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. The research methodology is based on the general scientific dialectical method, the universal scientific methods (system-structural, functional, the methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction) and special scientific methods (historical, comparative-legal, legal and dogmatic). The scientific novelty of the study consists in the analysis of the composition of agencies, responsible for individual industrial disputes, which decide about the reemployment of the worker. The author finds out that the composition covers not only jurisdictional bodies (the Labor disputes commission, court), but also the bodies, established by federal laws, which are known as the administrative jurisdiction bodies, which also decide about the reemployment of a worker. The author comes to the conclusion that the article 382 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, defining the jurisdictional bodies, responsible for the consideration of individual labor disputes, should be amended with the bodies of administrative jurisdiction. The author proposes a new version of this article. The realization of this proposal will complement the paragraph 3 of the article 234 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation which needs improvement due to the absence of references to the bodies of administrative jurisdiction. This measure will raise the level of the financial responsibility of an employer and the protection of labor rights of a worker. 

Keywords: decision of a jurisdictional agency , State labor inspector, financial responsibility of an employer , individual industrial disputes , court, Labor disputes commission , administrative jurisdiction bodies , jurisdictional bodies, employer, employee

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2016.11.2104

Publish date:

07-12-2016


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Anisimov L. N., Anisimov A. L. Material'naya otvetstvennost' storon trudovogo dogovora: prakticheskii kommentarii k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 30.06.2006 № 90-FZ. – M.: RedSO-Berator-Pablishing, 2006. – 400 s.
2.
Kommentarii k Trudovomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Otv. red. V. L. Geikhman, E. N. Sidorenko. – M.: Yurait, 2012. – 843 s.
3.
Kommentarii k Trudovomu kodeksu RF / Pod red. K.N. Gusova. – M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008. – 896 s.
4.
Kommentarii postateinyi k Trudovomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Otv. red. N.G. Gladkov, I.O. Snigireva. – M.: Profizdat, 2006. – 1032 s.
5.
Orobets V.M., Yakovlev D.A. Trudovoe pravo: Uchebnoe posobie. – SPb.: Piter, 2008. – 272 s.
6.
Trudovoe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. O.V. Smirnova. – M.: OOO «TK Velbi», 2003. – 528 s.
7.
Trudovoe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. O.V. Smirnova, I.O. Snigirevoi. M.: Prospekt, 2013. – 624 s.
8.
Kirillova L.S. Predely individual'no-dogovornogo regulirovaniya trudovykh otnoshenii // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 1. - C. 121 - 126. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.1.17536.
9.
Eseva E.Yu., Andriyanov V.N. Prava rabotodatelei i rabotnikov. Kollizii printsipa ravenstva. // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 5. - C. 680 - 684. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.5.14471.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website