Статья 'О необходимости введения уголовной ответственности за коррупционный сговор сторон в гражданском и уголовном процессе.' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

On the necessity to introduce criminal responsibility for a corruption-related collusion of parties to criminal proceedings

Vyrva Petr

Assistant, Senior Educator, the Department of Criminology and Tort Law, Law Institute of Siberian Federal University  

660098, Russia, Krasnoyarskii krai, g. Krasnoyarsk, ul. Maerchaka, 6

hope.solo@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2016.11.2072

Review date:

07-08-2020


Publish date:

16-10-2016


Abstract.

The paper substantiates the necessity to introduce criminal responsibility for a corruption-related collusion of parties to criminal proceedings. The research object is social relations in the sphere of criminal policy formation, struggle against corruption-related crimes, criminalization of trading in procedural influence. The research subject is the set of current anti-corruption provisions of Russian legislation. The author considers the problem of a possible corruption-related collusion of the parties to criminal or civil proceedings, aimed at a purposeful loosing of a case. Special attention is given to the social danger of such a deed and the lack of legal consequences in the current legislation. The research methodology is based on general scientific and special research methods: dialectical, epistemological, formal-legal, formal-logical, system-structure and linguistic methods. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the improvement of the legal framework of struggle against corruption. The author concludes that, in order to prevent a corruption-related collusion of parties, it is necessary to criminalize such actions as a bribery of a party to the proceedings (representatives of the plaintiff, the defendant, the aggrieved, the civil plaintiff, the private prosecutor, the lawyer), a premeditated failure to give evidence and a purposeful loosing of a case. 

Keywords: criminalization, crime prevention, evidence, criminal responsibility, legislation, lawyer tampering, preventive measures, representation of interests, corruption, social danger
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
«Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii» ot 14.11.2002 N 138-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
2.
«Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii» ot 18.12.2001 N 174-FZ (red. ot 06.07.2016) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
3.
Yudin A.V. Kategoriya «risk» v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2014. N 5. S. 11-53.
4.
«Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii» ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 06.07.2016) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
5.
Reshetnikova I.V. Dokazyvanie v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve v preddverii unifikatsii protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Zakon. 2014. N 10. S. 26-32.
6.
Selina E.V. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe znachenie kosvennykh dokazatel'stv // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2014. N 12. S. 23-25.
7.
Sharov D.V. Predmet dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: istoricheskii opyt i sovremennye problemy // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2014. N11. S. 2603-2606.
8.
Mokhov A.A. Issledovanie i otsenka sudom ekspertnogo zaklyucheniya, poluchennogo v poryadke obespecheniya notariusom dokazatel'stv // Sud'ya. 2014. N 7. S. 22-25.
9.
Budylin S.L. Vnutrennee ubezhdenie ili balans veroyatnostei? Standarty dokazyvaniya v Rossii i za rubezhom // Vestnik VAS RF. 2014. N 4. S. 34-66.
10.
Belokovyl'skii M.S. Nekotorye problemy pravovoi reglamentatsii stadii predvaritel'nogo slushaniya v UPK RF: voprosy isklyucheniya nedopustimykh dokazatel'stv // Advokat. 2014. N 8. S. 47-54.
11.
Federal'nyi Zakon ot 07.02.1992 N 2300-1 (red. ot 03.07.2016) «O zashchite prav potrebitelei» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
12.
«Kodeks professional'noi etiki advokata» (prinyat Pervym Vserossiiskim s''ezdom advokatov 31.01.2003) (red. ot 22.04.2015) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website