Статья 'Философские категории в правовой науке и правовые категории: проблемы теории и методологии' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Philosophical categories in legal science: problems of theory and methodology

Kulikov Egor Alekseevich

PhD in Law

senior lecturer, Chair of Criminal Law and Criminology, Altai State University

656010, Russia, Altaiskii krai, g. Barnaul, ul. Smirnova, 46, kv. 151

kulikoveg@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.10.20393

Review date:

07-08-2020


Publish date:

15-10-2017


Abstract.

The research subject is the patterns of manifestation of philosophical categories in the legal sphere of social life, the approaches to understanding philosophical categories and the specificity of interpretation of philosophical categories by legal science. The author considers the modern ideas about the system of philosophical categories presented in scientific works. In the second part of the article, based on the approaches to the categories as a philosophical phenomenon, the author considers legal categories. The author analyzes the approaches to these categories, studies their role in jurisprudence and the system of legal categories. Special attention is given to the diversity of legal notions. The research subject is closely connected with the methodology. The key methodological approach is the dialectical approach, which is the basis for the system of categories. The author also uses general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, abstraction, and the formal-legal method. The author attempts to actualize the problematics of legal categories and legal notions, and manifestation of philosophical categories in law. This work is the continuation of the author’s candidate thesis. Here the author uses the higher level of abstraction. He moves from consideration of manifestation of one category (measure) in legal science to general principles of manifestation of philosophical categories in the legal sphere of social life. Besides, based on few existing scientific works in this sphere, the author studies the specificity of legal categories and the diversity of legal notions. 

Keywords: classification, patterns, legal science , dialectics, principles, methodology, concepts, categories, manifestations, basis
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Knigin A.N. Uchenie o kategoriyakh: Ucheb. posobie. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2002. 292 s.
2.
Levin G.D. Filosofskie kategorii v sovremennom diskurse. M.: Logos, 2007. 224 s.
3.
Buchilo N.F., Isaev I.A. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Prospekt, 2012. 432 s.
4.
Vasil'ev A.M. Pravovye kategorii: Metodologicheskie aspekty razrabotki sistemy kategorii teorii prava. M.: Yurid. lit., 1976. 264 s.
5.
Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava: Predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava. – 6-e izd. – M.: Izd-vo SGU, 2011. 521 s.
6.
Syrykh V.M. Logicheskie osnovaniya obshchei teorii prava. T. 1. Elementnyi sostav. – 2-e izd., ster. – M.: ZAO Yustitsinform, 2004. 528 s.
7.
Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoi nauki. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Gum. Inst-ta, 2001. 264 s.
8.
Rudakov A.A. Parnye yuridicheskie kategorii: teoriya prav i obyazannostei: monografiya. – M.: Prospekt, 2016. 232 s.
9.
Problemy obshchei teorii prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod obshch. red. V.S. Nersesyantsa. M.: Norma, 2008. 832 s.
10.
Sorokin V.V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava perekhodnogo perioda: uchebnik. – Barnaul: OAO «Altaiskii poligraficheskii kombinat», 2007. 512 s.
11.
Kirillov V.I., Starchenko A.A. Logika: Uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov. Izd. 5-e, pererab. i dop. – M.: Yurist'', 2004. 256 s.
12.
Nasyrov R.V. Chelovek kak samotsennost': k voprosu o formulirovke stat'i 2 Konstitutsii RF 1993 g.: kurs lektsii.-M.: Yurlitinform, 2011. 312 s.
13.
L.V. Maksimov Chto takoe moral': problema opredeleniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 10. - C. 115 - 126.
14.
Kulikov E.A. Kategoriya mery v pravovoi nauke: voprosy teorii i metodologii issledovaniya // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - 10. - C. 89 - 99. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2014.10.13349. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_13349.html
15.
Bekishieva S.R. Kategoriya «pravovoi mir»: postanovka problemy // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 9. - C. 1111 - 1116. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.9.16439.
16.
Skorobogatov A.V., Krasnov A.V. Pravovaya real'nost' kak kategoriya yuridicheskoi nauki // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 7. - C. 934 - 940. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.7.13314.
17.
Gryaznova E.V. Metody poznaniya i kategorii filosofii nauki // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. - 2014. - 3. - C. 49 - 68. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8736.2014.3.12960. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pp/article_12960.html
18.
Sereda G.B. Printsip ekonomicheskoi obosnovannosti naloga // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2013. - 7. - C. 483 - 490. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.7.9131.
19.
Tsvetkov A.O. K voprosu o yuridicheskom zakreplenii pravovogo statusa inostrannogo voennoplennogo v Rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve (1829-1904) // Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya. - 2016. - 1. - C. 17 - 30. DOI: 10.7256/2409-868X.2016.1.16568. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_16568.html
20.
Naumov A.V. Teoreticheskoe nasledine A.E.Zhalinskogo v sfere ugolovnogo prava ( Retsenziya na knigu: A.E.Zhalinskii. Izbrannye trudy. Tom 2. Ugolovnoe pravo. M., Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 2015) // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 11. - C. 1565 - 1571. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.11.16288.
21.
Belyaeva G.S., Belyaev V.P. Klassifikatsiya pravovykh rezhimov: podkhody i osnovaniya // Pravo i politika. - 2015. - 7. - C. 1040 - 1048. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.7.10442.
22.
Karpov V.A. Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiya idei pravovoi gosudarstvennosti v zarubezhnoi nauke i praktike v KhKh-nachale XXI vv. // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 6. - C. 793 - 799. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.6.15489.
23.
Voinikanis E.A. Rol' paradigmal'nogo podkhoda v realizatsii prognosticheskoi funktsii teorii prava // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1399 - 1403. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.11.13318.
24.
M.M. Akilova K voprosu o kategoriyakh chasti i tselogo i ikh dialektiki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 5. - C. 40 - 49.
25.
Belyaeva G.S. K voprosu o sushchnosti i sisteme pravovykh sredstv // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 3. - C. 306 - 312. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.3.14347.
26.
Kupreev S.S. Soderzhanie gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: ot konfrontatsii k kompromissu // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 6. - C. 753 - 758. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.6744.
27.
S.V. Kodan Formirovanie istochnikovedeniya istorii gosudarstva i prava Rossii (XVIII – pervaya chetvert' XIX vv.) // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 649 - 661. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.14.
28.
Stoyukhina N.Yu., Kostrigin A.A. Otechestvennye psikhologi kontsa XIX - nachala XX vv. o snakh i snovideniyakh // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 63 - 69. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.1.13808.
29.
Selunskaya N.B. Sovremennyi yazyk istorika-professionala (Retsenziya na knigu: Teoriya i metodologiya istoricheskoi nauki. Terminologicheskii slovar' / Otv. red. A. O. Chubar'yan. M.: Akvilon, 2014. 576 s. (Obrazy istorii; otv. red. serii L. P. Repina) // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2015. - 2. - C. 244 - 246. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2015.2.16143.
30.
Logvinova I.V. Pravovye osnovaniya delegirovannykh normotvorcheskikh polnomochii Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Pravo i politika. - 2015. - 8. - C. 1105 - 1111. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.8.16050.
31.
Petyukova O.N. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya gosudarstvenno-konfessional'nykh otnoshenii v nauke administrativnogo prava na sovremennom etape // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 8. - C. 762 - 768. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.8.16115.
32.
Dubovik O.L. Retsenziya: Modeli sistemy prestuplenii v sovremennom ugolovnom prave (Sost. Iordan Aidarov) Sofiya: Universitetskoe izdatel'stvo «Paisii Khilendarskii», 2013. – 168 s. // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 8. - C. 1276 - 1281. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.8.12685.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website