по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

The legal status of an investigating judge in the Republic of Kazakhstan
Idirov Erlan

postgraduate student of the Department of Criminal Procedural Law of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University

125993, Russia, Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, 9

travian.2014@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Article was received:

06-08-2016


Review date:

07-08-2016


Abstract.

The research subject is the legal status of an investigating judge, introduced in criminal procedure in the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2015. The author describes the range of potential problems with the order of service of an investigating judge according to the Criminal Procedure Code of Kazakhstan; gives the examples of court practice of West Kazakhstan region. The author specifies the problems within an investigating judge’s jurisdiction, his competence and authority to consider the cases on a pre-trial stage. The author applies various research methods including the general scientific and the comparative ones. The author offers establishing the period of service of an investigation judge for improving stability and creating the scope of judicial practice. The author emphasizes that the election of an investigating judge by the judges from among their colleagues, instead of the appointment by the court president without regard to the opinion of the judiciary, would be one of the first steps on the road to establishing elective judiciary in the country. 

Keywords: authorities, court jurisdiction, supervision, judicial control, judicial system, Kazakhstan, criminal procedure, criminal process, court, investigating judge

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2016.9.19996

Publish date:

06-09-2016


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda № 231-V // «Kazakhstanskaya pravda», № 133(27754) ot 10 iyulya 2014 goda.
2.
Plan Natsii – 100 shagov-Sovremennoe gosudarstvo dlya vsekh // Gazeta «Kazakhstanskaya pravda», №92 (27968) ot 20 maya 2015 goda. S. 2-5.
3.
Zakon Ukrainy «O sudoustroistve i statuse sudei» ot 7 iyulya 2010 goda // (Vіdomostі Verkhovnoї Radi Ukraїni (VVR), 2010, № 41-42, № 43, № 44-45, st.529.
4.
Konstitutsionnyi Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 25 dekabrya 2000 goda №132 «O sudebnoi sisteme i statuse sudei RK» // «Vedomosti Parlamenta Respubliki Kazakhstan», 2000 g., № 23, st. 410.
5.
Idirov E.I. Sledstvennyi sud'ya v proekte novogo UPK Respubliki Kazakhstan // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 9. C. 14-26. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.9.9555. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9555.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website