Статья 'Европейские модели производства в суде присяжных: суд присяжных в Австрии (сравнительно-правовое исследование).' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

The European models of proceeding in jury trials: jury trial in Austria (comparative legal study)

Nasonov Sergei Aleksandrovich

PhD in Law

Lawyer, Moscow City Bar Association; Docent, the department of Criminal Procedural Law, O. E. Kutafin Moscow State University

125993, Russia, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Street 9

sergei-nasonov@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2016.9.19911

Review date:

08-08-2020


Publish date:

06-09-2016


Abstract.

The article is devoted to the specificity of proceeding in jury according to the Austrian CCP, adopted in 1975 (with amendments of 2016) as a kind of a European model of this procedure. These features are considered from a comparative legal aspect and compared with the same procedure, contained in the Russian CCP.Proceeding in jury trial in Austria is an example of a continental type of this form of hearing of a case, and this is a factor conditioning the significant differences between this procedure and the same one established by the Russian CCP. The presiding judge possesses a wide discretion in the field of proving. The features of the judicial enquiry in jury in Austria are the following: examination of evidences begins with the questioning of the accused; the procedures of examination of evidences of the defense and the prosecution are equal; a wide examination of information about a personality of an accused before the jury. The article notes the specificity of a stage of putting questions before the jury (there exist four types of questions), the specificity of the summing-up of the judge (he gives it in the jury-room and doesn’t speak on a factual side of a case), the specificity of the jury's deliberation when they have to give a short explanation of their answers, and the opportunity of a panel of professional judges to attend the jury's deliberation. The article suggests the possibility of reception of certain elements of the Austrian model of proceeding in jury trial by the Russian legislation.

Keywords: selection of a jury, summing-up, sentence, examination of witnesses, judicial enquiry, verdict, juror, jury trial, proving, presiding judge
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Butov V. N. Ugolovnyi protsess Avstrii.— Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoyar. un-ta, 1988.
2.
Zakon o sudakh po delam nesovershennoletnikh (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 avgusta 2016 g.).
3.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoi kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29.01.2008 g. № 74-O07-51sp//SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
4.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoi kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28.08.2008 g. № 63-O08-3sp//SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
5.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoi kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29.06. 2005 g. № 66-o05-35sp// SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
6.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda ot 21.11.2012 g. № 5-O12-117sp//SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»
7.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 01.11.2012 g. № 41-O12-71sp//SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»
8.
Nasonov S.A. Kontinental'naya model' proizvodstva v sude prisyazhnykh: genezis i osobennosti protsedury//Pravo i politika.-2015.-№ 11.-S. 1567 – 1572.
9.
Nasonov S.A. Nesoglasie s obvinitel'nym verdiktom prisyazhnykh zasedatelei: sravnitel'no-pravovoi i teoreticheskii podkhody // Pravo i politika.-2016.-№ 2.-C. 248-253. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.2.17786
10.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 25.08.1993 g. po delu «Sekanina protiv Avstrii» (Sekanina v. Austria) zhaloba № 13126/87, § 9 (poslednee poseshchenie – 10 avgusta 2016 g.).
11.
Radutnaya N.V. Sud prisyazhnykh v kontinental'noi sisteme prava // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 1995. № 1. S. 8–10
12.
Rudenko V.N. Uchastie grazhdan v otpravlenii pravosudiya v sovremennom mire. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN.2011.
13.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Avstrii (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 avgusta 2016 g.).
14.
Taylor G. Jury Trial in Austria. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal Vol. 14, No. 2 (Spring 2011), pp. 281-325.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website