по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Judicial independence in Russia: doctrinal approaches and the role of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in its strengthening
Nokhrin Dmitry

PhD in Law

Vice-Chairman Adviser at the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation

190000, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Senatskaya ploshchad', 1, office 1251

sanctum1@yandex.ru

Article was received:

09-07-2016


Review date:

04-07-2016


Abstract.

The author attempts to comprehensively analyze such legal category as judiciary independence and outline its main aspects and limits with regard to various levels of the judiciary. Judicial independence is described as a complex multi-aspect phenomenon, determined by the complexity of the very phenomenon of the judiciary. The author studies the independence feature in relation to each level of organization (realization) of the judiciary, detects the aspects of independence, describes the constitutional guarantees of its realization. Special attention is given to the legal positions of the Constitutional Court. The research is based on the methodology of the system approach. The author relies on the understanding of the judiciary as a complex multilayer socio-political system (subsystem of the state). The author also uses formal-logical research methods. The paper contains the author’s attempt to comprehensively analyze the constitutional-legal grounds of judicial independence and the role of the decisions of the Constitutional Court in the formation of the guarantees of judicial independence. The author concludes about the growing importance of judicial review of constitutionality determining the development of Russian judicial system in the direction of more transparent, independent and fair judicial procedure enjoying the confidence of most citizens. 

Keywords: constitutionalization of justice , constitutional and legal positions, guarantees of judicial independence , limits of judicial independence, community of judges , Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, independent court, judicial organization, judicial system, judiciary

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.7.19633

Publish date:

20-07-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Montesk'e Sh. O dukhe zakonov // Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1955. 803 c.
2.
Noskov I.Yu. Ob osobennom i obshchem v soderzhanii ponyatii "nezavisimost' sudebnoi vlasti, sud'i" i "samostoyatel'nost' sudebnoi vlasti, sud'i" // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2013. № 1. C. 39-42.
3.
Sudebnaya vlast' / Pod red. I.L. Petrukhina. M., 2003. 720 s.
4.
Abrosimova E.B. Ocherki rossiiskogo sudoustroistva: reformy i rezul'taty. M., 2009. 279 s.
5.
Samostoyatel'nost' i nezavisimost' sudebnoi vlasti Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Pod red. V.V. Ershova. M., 2006. 493 s.
6.
Anishina V.I. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya doktrina samostoyatel'nosti sudebnoi vlasti v sovremennoi Rossii: problemy teorii i praktiki realizatsii. M., 2008. 232 s.
7.
Mikhailovskaya I.B. Sudy i sud'i: nezavisimost' i upravlyaemost'. M., 2008. 128 s.
8.
Morshchakova T.G. Rossiiskoe pravosudie v kontekste sudebnoi reformy. M., 2004. 264 s.
9.
Vystuplenie professora T.G. Morshchakovoi na Vtorykh Senatskikh chteniyakh 12 oktyabrya 2009 g. URL: http://www.ksrf.ru
10.
Modernizatsiya statusa sud'i: sovremennye mezhdunarodnye podkhody / Pod. red. T.N. Neshataevoi. M., 2011. 336 s.
11.
Grazhdanskii protsess: uchebnik / pod red. M.K. Treushnikova. M., 2014. 960 s.
12.
Gadzhiev G.A. Konstitutsionnyi printsip samostoyatel'nosti sudebnoi vlasti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii (na osnove reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF 2000-2002 godov) // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2003. № 1. S. 9-17.
13.
Chirkin V.E. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: Rossiya i zarubezhnyi opyt. M., 1998. 448 s.
14.
A.M. Tsaliev O neobkhodimosti dal'neishei detsentralizatsiii demokratizatsii sudebnoi vlasti v Rossii // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 499 - 503. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.7.
15.
S. I. Balabkin Ob okonchatel'nosti reshenii Konstitutsionnogo suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 4. - C. 689 - 695.
16.
Vasyaev A.A. Kollegial'noe ili edinolichnoe rassmotrenie ugolovnogo dela sud'ei? // Sovremennoe pravo. 2009. N 10. S. 120 - 122.
17.
Vas'kovskii E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa / Pod red. i s predisloviem V.A. Tomsinova. M., 2003. 464 c.
18.
Prikhod'ko I.A. Dostupnost' pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsesse: osnovnye problemy. Spb. 2005. 672 s.
19.
Alieskerov M.A.Kollegial'noe i edinolichnoe rassmotrenie grazhdanskikh del v sudakh vtoroi instantsii // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2008. N 9. S. 33-36.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website