Статья 'Правила разграничения компетенции судов по делам о банкротстве граждан ' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Rules of distribution of powers of citizens' bankruptcy courts

Strelkova Irina Ivanovna

PhD in Law

Associate professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines at Noso Magnitogorosk State Technical University. 

455000, Russia, Chelyabinskaya oblast', g. Magnitogorsk, Lenina, 38

strigul68@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2015.4.14541

Review date:

04-08-2020


Publish date:

03-04-2015


Abstract.

The object of the research includes the actual changes in legal regulation of insolvency (bankruptcy) connected with the introduction of institution of bankruptcy of natural persons without a status of an individual entrepreneur, and the transfer of consumer bankruptcy cases to the competence of the courts of general jurisdiction. Special attention is paid to the analysis of standards of the Code of civil procedure of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration procedural code of the Russian Federation, differentiating the powers of courts and arbitration courts on cases of insolvency (bankruptcy), to the questions of jurisdiction of citizens' bankruptcy cases, their exclusive and territorial  jurisdiction. The methodology of the research is based on the complex analysis of the regulations of Russian legislation concerning the jurisdiction of citizens' bankruptcy cases, and the provisions of the Concept of the unified Code of civil procedure of the Russian Federation about the competence of the courts. The author comes to the conclusion that the reforming of judicial system in a result of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation abolition, and the activities aimed at the unification of civil and arbitration proceedings reveal a tendency to a further merge of courts and arbitration courts. Under these circumstances the exclusive  jurisdiction institution should serve as a mechanism of their powers distribution. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the author suggests the usage of the term "jurisdiction" in the Code of civil procedure of the Russian Federation in order to differentiate the powers of courts from the powers of arbitration courts.

Keywords: citizens, consumer bankruptcy, jurisdiction of courts, jurisdiction, judicial reform, arbitration courts, special jurisdiction, civil procedure, arbitration process, unification
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Arbitrazhnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal'nyi zakon ot 24 iyulya 2002 g. № 95–FZ (v red. ot 31.12.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii. – 2002. – № 30. – St. 3012.
2.
Bol'shoi yuridicheskii slovar' / pod red. A. Ya. Sukhareva, V. E. Krutskikh.¬ ¬¬ 2 – e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: INFRA–M, 2001. 704 s.
3.
Gol'msten A. Kh. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. 4–e izd. SPb., 1907. 426 s.
4.
Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal'nyi zakon ot 14 noyabrya 2002 g. № 138–FZ (v red. ot 31.12.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2002. – № 46. – St. 4532.
5.
Karpova E. V. Prostranstvo kak ob''ekt filosofsko – pravovogo vospriyatiya // Politika i obshchestvo. 2013. № 3. S. 315-321.
6.
Kontseptsiya edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa RF: odobrena resheniem Komiteta po grazhdanskomu, ugolovnomu, arbitrazhnomu i protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu GD FS RF ot 08.12.2014 g. № 124 (1). Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav. – pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
7.
Osipov Yu. K. Podvedomstvennost' yuridicheskikh del: ucheb. posobie. Sverdlovsk, 1973. 123 s.
8.
O vnesenii izmenenii v Federal'nyi zakon «O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve)» i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v chasti regulirovaniya reabilitatsionnykh protsedur, primenyaemykh v otnoshenii grazhdanina – dolzhnika»: federal'nyi zakon ot 29 dekabrya 2014 g. № 476–FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2015. – № 1 (chast' I). – St. 29.
9.
O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve): federal'nyi zakon ot 26 oktyabrya 2002 g. № 127 – FZ (v red. ot 29 dekabrya 2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2002. – № 43. – St. 4190.
10.
O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve): federal'nyi zakon ot 8 yanvarya 1998 g. № 6–FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 1998. – № 2. – St. 222. (Utratil silu).
11.
Ob utverzhdenii Strategii razvitiya ipotechnogo zhilishchnogo kreditovaniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii do 2030 goda: rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 19 iyulya 2010 g. № 1201– r. Dostup iz sprav. – pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
12.
O Kontseptsii dolgosrochnogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2020 goda: rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 17.11.2008 g. № 1662 – r (v red. ot 08.08.2009) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2008. – № 47. – St. 5489.
13.
O Verkhovnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii i prokurature Rossiiskoi Federatsii: zakon RF o popravke k Konstitutsii RF ot 5 fevralya 2014 g. № 2 – FKZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2014. – № 6. – St. 548.
14.
Poyasnitel'naya zapiska k proektu Federal'nogo zakona «O vnesenii izmenenii v Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii». Dostup iz sprav. – pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
15.
Proekt Federal'nogo zakona № 105976-6 «O vnesenii izmenenii v Federal'nyi zakon "O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve)" i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v chasti regulirovaniya reabilitatsionnykh protsedur, primenyaemykh v otnoshenii grazhdanina –dolzhnika». Dostup iz sprav. – pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
16.
URL: http://www.rg.ru/sujet/3994/ (data obrashcheniya 18.01.2015)
17.
Nechaeva S.V. Obshchie osnovaniya razgranicheniya podvedomstvennosti mezhdu sudom obshchei yurisdiktsii i arbitrazhnym sudom po deistvuyushchemu rossiiskomu zakonodatel'stvu. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 11. - C. 5 - 9.
18.
Strelkova I.I. Podvedomstvennost' del o potrebitel'skom bankrotstve: istoriya i perspektivy razvitiya instituta // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 3. - C. 92 - 107. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_196.html
19.
Bogdan V.V. Nekotorye osobennosti realizatsii prava potrebitelei na sudebnuyu zashchitu // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2015. - 2. - C. 40 - 58. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.2.14074. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_14074.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website