Статья 'Об оптимизации понятия "хищение" в российском законодательстве' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

On optimizing the term "theft" in the Russian legislation.

Dolgikh Igor' Petrovich

Senior Lecturer, Department of Administrative Law and Administrative Activities of the Internal Affairs Bodies of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

394065, Russia, Voronezhskaya oblast', g. Voronezh, ul. Antokol'skogo, 14, kv. 134

idol_2008@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Shebanov Dmitrii Valer'evich

lecturer, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

394065, Russia, Voronezh, prospekt Patriotov, 53.

shebanov.dmitri@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2014.5.11933

Review date:

07-08-2020


Publish date:

1-5-2014


Abstract.

In this article the authors attempted to study the issues of qualification of forms and types of theft of property of persons, defining the criminal law problems in this sphere, as well as the possible solutions for them. The author attempted to generalize and analyze the doctrinal opinions on this issue with certain theoretical conclusions on the moment of completing the crime against property. As an object of studies the authors use legal norms defining legal responsibility for the unlawful acts against property relations and practice of their application.  In their studies the authors actively use dialectic approach to scientific cognition in combination to logical, statistical, comparative legal and some other general and specific scientific methods of cognition of a society. The studies have legal novelty, which is due to the compelx of theoretical provisions developed by the authors. In the nearest future these provisions may serve as the basis for the optimization of the Russian legislation in part of defining the final moment of the unlawful acts against propert, both crimes and administrative offences. The article provides a new definition of theft, allowing to avoid many violations of law in the proceedings on administrative and criminal cases. The said provisions are of both scientific and practical  value.

Keywords: theft, stealing, completion of theft, small theft, proprietary harm, real damage, disposal of property owned by other people, uncompleted crime, attempted offence, crime against property
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bratanov V.V. Khishchenie kul'turnykh tsennostei: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2001.
2.
Vladimirov V.A. Kvalifikatsiya pokhishchenii lichnogo imushchestva. M., 1974., s. 35-41.
3.
Dolgikh I.P., Chernyaev G.M. Krupnye problemy melkogo khishcheniya // Universum: Ekonomika i yurisprudentsiya : elektron. nauchn. zhurn. 2014. № 1 (2). URL: http://7universum.com/ru/economy/archive/item/828 (data obrashcheniya: 19.04.2014).
4.
Ermakova O.V. Moment okonchaniya khishcheniya: zakon, teoriya, praktika // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2010.-№1, s. 44-46.
5.
Krasutskikh L.V. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii ugolovno-pravovykh norm o khishcheniyakh // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2007. №28, s. 52-54.
6.
Kurchenko V. Okonchennoe prestuplenie ili pokushenie? // Zakonnost'. – 2005.-№11, s. 47-49.
7.
Litovchenko V.N. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za posyagatel'stva na sotsialisticheskuyu sobstvennost' (ponyatie khishcheniya). – M., 1985.
8.
O nekotorykh problemakh administrativnogo rassledovaniya // Universum: Ekonomika i yurisprudentsiya : elektron. nauchn. zhurn. 2014. №2 (3). URL: http://7universum.com/ru/economy/archive/item/929 (data obrashcheniya: 19.04.2014).
9.
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 09.02.2006 g. №38-ad05-1 / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: www.base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 19.04.2014).
10.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.12.2002 N 29 (red. ot 23.12.2010) «O sudebnoi praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe» / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: www.base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 19.04.2014).
11.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.12.2007 N 51 «O sudebnoi praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate» / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: www.base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 19.04.2014).
12.
Tret'yak M., Voloshin V. Opredelenie momenta okonchaniya khishcheniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007.-№3, s. 60-64
13.
Bakradze A.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii khishcheniya kak material'nogo sostava // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 56-65. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.609. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_609.html
14.
Androshchuk V.V. Stat'ya o vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya v rossiiskikh usloviyakh opyta i rekomendatsii ob''edinenii zarubezhnykh revizorov po protivodeistviyu moshennichestvu i khishcheniyam // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 4.-S.1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.4.8905. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_8905.html
15.
Astishina T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' prestuplenii protiv obshchestvennoi nravstvennosti s inymi vidami prestuplenii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.1.10778
16.
Androshchuk V.V.. O vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya v rossiiskikh usloviyakh opyta i rekomendatsii ob''edinenii zarubezhnykh revizorov po protivodeistviyu moshennichestvu i khishcheniyam // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.3.8910
17.
Ivanov A.G.. Legalizatsiya dragotsennykh metallov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem: problemy privlecheniya k ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.18
18.
A. G. Korchagin. Pravovaya politika regulirovaniya raschetov s ispol'zovaniem bankovskikh kart // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
19.
Savostin A.A.. Ugolovno-pravovye problemy bor'by s pokhishcheniem cheloveka // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 104-107
20.
Bezgin V.B. Krazhi v rossiiskom sele vtoroi poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 285 - 319. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.5112. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_5112.html
21.
R.S. Koval'chuk Khishchenie mobil'nykh telefonnykh apparatov. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 2. - C. 5 - 7.
22.
Karchevskii N.V. Osnovnye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v kontekste sotsial'nykh tendentsii informatizatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 152 - 196. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.8317. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8317.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website