—тать€ '¬иды оснований дл€ исключений из нормы об исчерпании внутренних средств правовой защиты, признанных в международном праве' - журнал 'ёридические исследовани€' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

ѕубликаци€ за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
ѕри необходимости издательство предоставл€ет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. ”же через 72 часа стать€ по€вл€етс€ в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
ѕо первому требованию предоставл€ем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

The types of grounds for exclusions from the norm on the exhaustion of the domestic means of legal protection, as recognized in the international law.

Shovkrinskii Artur Yusupovich

postgraduate student, Assistant to the Deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the Project Survey and Scientific Research Institute "Soyuzmorniiprojekt"

125319, Russia, Moskva, Bolshoi Koptevskiy pr., 3.

cool.poz@yandex.ru
ƒругие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2014.5.11876

Review date:

09-08-2020


Publish date:

1-5-2014


Abstract.

The author studies the types of ground for exclusions from the norm on the exhaustion of the domestic means of legal protection, as recognized in the international law. In particular, he analyzes such grounds as the lack of access to the domestic means of legal protection, inefficiency of domestic means of legal protection, unjustified delay in  justice, etc. The exception from the rule of exhaustion of domestic means of legal protection is based upon the provisions of international treaties. The author states that usually exempting the claimant from the obligation to exhaust the domestic means of legal protection has to do with the lack of funds for payment to the legal representative.  The author notes that the absence of procedural guarantees of fair and public judicial proceedings, fair and impartial court characterizes the means of judicial protection as being inefficient, an unjustified delay in dealing with the case by the court or other bodies may also serve as grounds for exemption to the rule of exhaustion of the domestic means of legal protection.  Finally, the author notes that in the general provisions of international law it is possible to exempt from the application of certain means of legal protection, if it shall lead to the repeated or continued violation of rights, and it may also lead to the situation where the rule on the exhaustion of the domestic remedies may not apply.

Keywords: international law, European law, the Council of Europe, the European Court, judicial practice, exhaustion of remedies, judicial protection, domestic legal order, international courts, domestic courts
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
F. Sudre, Droit européen et international des droits de lТhomme, PUF; 6ème éd., 2003.
2.
Communication No. 8/1977. HRC Selected Decisions. P. 48
3.
Communication No. 70/1980. HRC Selected Decisions. R. 131.
4.
Communication No. 29/1978. HRC Selected Decisions. R. 11-12
5.
Greece v. UK, Application 299/57 // 2 YBECHR (1958-1959). R. 194-196;
6.
Montero v. Uruguay, Communication No. 106/81, Doc. A/38/40. R. 186, І 6.1
7.
American Convention on Human Rights, 1969.
8.
Mezhamerikanskaya komissiya po pravam cheloveka byla organom Organizatsii Amerikanskikh gosudarstv, kotoraya byla pervym zvenom mekhanizma rassmotreniya zhalob o narushenii Konventsii o pravakh cheloveka; ona ustanavlivala priemlemost' iska. Sm.: Statute of the OAS Inter-American Commission of Human Rights.
9.
OAS docs. OAE/Ser.L/V/II. 1-29, . OAE/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.21, . OAE/Ser.L/V/II., doc.41-Rev.2
10.
X v. Federal Republic of Germany, Application 181/56 // HUDOC Database; Communication No. 19/1977. HRC Selected Decisions. R. 23
11.
Communication No. 397/1990, І5.4
12.
Advisory Opinion OC-11/90, 10 August 1990 //Annual Report of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (1990).
13.
Resolution No. 1a/88, Case 9755 // Annual Report Inter-American Commission of HumanRights. 1987-1988. P. 137
14.
Gilboa v. Uruguay, Doc. A/41/40 // Decisions and Views of the Human Rights Committee rendered pursuant to the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
15.
Becker v. Denmark, Application No. 7011/75 // http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,COECOMMHR,,DNK,,3ae6b7058,0.html
16.
Retimag v. Federal Republic of Germany, Application 712/60 // 4 YBECHR. P. 400.
17.
X v.Federal Republic of Germany, Application 8961/80 //24 YBECHR. P. 74
18.
Application no. 5095/71; 5920/72; 5926/72 // HUDOC database.
19.
Communication No. 28/1978.
20.
Resolution No. 16/84, Case No. 7951 // Annual Report Inter-American Commission of Human Rights. 1984-1985. R. 103
21.
Application 222/56 // 2 YBECHR. 1958Ч9. R. 350
22.
Application 788/60 //4 YBECHR. R. 146
23.
Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands v. Greece, Applications 3321-3/67 and 3344/67.
24.
Greece v. UK, Application 176/56 // 2 YBECHR. 1958Ч9. R. 182.
25.
Stogmüller v. Austria, Application 1602/62 // HUDOC database
26.
Neumeister v. Austria, Application 1936/63 // HUDOC database
27.
Inhabitants of Alsemberg and of Beersel v. Belgium, Application 1474/62 // HUDOC database Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Ч 2013.-є 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
28.
A. R. Sultanov. Esse o sudebnykh protsessakh ogranicheniya svobody vyrazheniya mnenii i svobody sovesti, urokakh istorii i evropeiskikh standartakh. // Politika i Obshchestvo. Ц 2010. Ц є 10.
29.
Danel'yan A.A.. Pravovye voprosy prinuditel'nogo iz''yatiya inostrannoi sobstvennosti i inostrannykh investitsii v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravo i politika. Ц 2014. Ц є 4. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11507
30.
Kostenko N.I.. Kontseptsiya stanovleniya mezhdunarodnogo ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo (penitentsiarnogo) prava // Pravo i politika. Ц 2014. Ц є 4. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11614
31.
Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Ч 2013.-є 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
32.
Shinkaretskaya G.G.. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud: popytka otsenki // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. Ц 2014. Ц є 1. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11593
33.
Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeiskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiiskoi Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Ч 2013.-є 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.html
34.
A.S. Smbatyan. Organy mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya: klassifikatsiya v ramkakh obshchei sistemy // Pravo i politika. Ц 2013. Ц є 4. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.12
35.
A.S. Smbatyan. Pervoe reshenie Suda evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva Ц v kopilku avtoriteta // Pravo i politika. Ц 2012. Ц є 12. Ц S. 104-107.
36.
A. S. Smbatyan. Obychnye normy mezhdunarodnogo prava i obshchie printsipy kak istochnik sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Pravo i politika. Ц 2012. Ц є 4. Ц S. 104-107.
37.
A. S. Smbatyan. Pravotvorchestvo mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov: opyt MUTBYu // Pravo i politika. Ц 2012. Ц є 3. Ц S. 104-107.
38.
A. S. Smbatyan. Nuzhno li Ђspasat'ї sistemu mezhdunarodnogo sudoproizvodstva ot fragmentatsii? // Pravo i politika. Ц 2011. Ц є 9. Ц S. 104-107
39.
Mil'chakova O.V.. Predely vmeshatel'stva Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v deyatel'nost' Konstitutsionnogo suda Bosnii i Gertsegoviny // Pravo i politika. Ц 2014. Ц є 2. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10872
40.
O. O. Salagai. Issledovanie pravovykh pozitsii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v otnoshenii zashchity lits, stradayushchikh psikhicheskimi rasstroistvami // Pravo i politika. Ц 2012. Ц є 4. Ц S. 104-107.
41.
Lyubchenko M.Ya.. K voprosu o znachenii postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. Ц 2013. Ц є 8. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.75
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website