Статья 'Интегральный характер современного российского правопонимания' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Integration character of the modern Russian legal understanding.

Skorobogatov Andrey

Doctor of History

Professor, Chair of Theory of State and Law and Public-Law Discipline, Institute of Economics, Management and Law (Kazan).

420111, Russia, respublika Tatarstan, g. Kazan', ul. Moskovskaya, 42

askorobogatov@rambler.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2014.3.11127

Review date:

06-08-2020


Publish date:

1-3-2014


Abstract.

The article is devoted to the studies of the modern Russian legal understanding.  The author bases his position upon the broadening of the subject field of the legal studies in the conditions of post-Classical paradigm, within which the main attention is paid to the interpretation of the legal matters. Based upon the studies of various legal doctrines, normative expression of legal understanding in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and analysis of the modern Russian legal reality the author offers a typology of legal understanding based upon the criteria of interpretation of law and legal reality, providing for five basic models.  The combination of these models in legal reality allows one to speak of an integral character of the Russian legal understanding. The methodological basis for the studies is formed by the dialectic approach towards cognition of social matters, allowing for analysis of their historical development and their functioning within the context of combination of objective and subjective factors, as well as the post-Modern paradigm, allowing to study legal reality at various levels, including the level of legal interpretation.  The dialectic approach and post-Modern paradigm defined the choice of specific methods for the studies, including comparative, hermeneutic and discourse methods.  The article for the first time applies discourse method for the analysis of the category of legal understanding. Based upon the analysis of various methodological models the author makes a conclusion on an integral character of the Russian legal understanding, which was implemented via the pluralism of the post-Soviet legal discourse and served as a prerequisite for the multitude of meanings of legal regulators, defining the post-Soviet legal reality.

Keywords: law, legal understanding, phylosophical and legal category, legal reality, natural law theory, normativism, social legal understanding, integrative legal understanding, post-Modern legal understanding, post-Classical paradigm
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Averin A.V. Pravoponimanie i yuridicheskaya praktika // Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2008. № 4(14). S. 19 – 36.
2.
Babaev V.K., Demidov V.V. Zakonnost' i ee printsipy // Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2004. № 1. S. 133 – 144.
3.
Baitin M.I. Sushchnost' prava (Sovremennoe normativnoe pravoponimanie na grani dvukh vekov). Izd. 2-e, dop. M.: OOO ID «Pravo i gosudarstvo», 2005. 416 s.
4.
Gepkhart V. Obshchestvennye teorii i pravo. Pravo v sovremennom sotsiologicheskom diskurse // Sotsiologiya prava v Germanii: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov / otv. red. E.V. Alferova. M.: INION RAN, 2008. S. 91 – 94.
5.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Dialektika estestvennogo i pozitivnogo prava kak istochnik obshchestvenno-pravovogo progressa // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. 2013. № 3. S. 221-238. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.559. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_559.html
6.
Ershov V.V. Vystuplenie 1 dekabrya 2008 goda v Ministerstve yustitsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii na temu: «Rol' i znachenie doktriny v formirovanii pravovogo gosudarstva» v formate nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Rol' yustitsii v formirovanii rossiiskogo grazhdanskogo obshchestva i pravovogo gosudarstva». S. 3 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: www.raj.ru.
7.
Kanygin V.I., Gruzdeva V.V., Grishanin I.K. Filosofskoe obosnovanie prava: Monografiya. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2008. 129 s.
8.
Konovalova M.V. Tipy kogerentnosti yuridicheskogo diskursa // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. № 21. S. 83 – 86.
9.
Markin A.V. Monopoliya na pravo i na ego ponimanie // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. 2012. № 1. S.107-125. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.1.33. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_33.html.
10.
Maslovskaya E.V. Sotsiologicheskie teorii prava i analiz pravovykh institutov rossiiskogo obshchestva: Monografiya. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo NISOTs, 2007. 139 s.
11.
Miroshnichekno D.A. Interpretatsiya prava kak problema yuridicheskoi praktiki // Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniya regionov. 2011. № 2. S. 85 – 93.
12.
Ol'kov S.G. Analiticheskaya yurisprudentsiya (metodologiya yurisprudentsii): uchebnik. Ch. 1.-M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 592 s.
13.
Palashevskaya I.V. Zhanry yuridicheskogo diskursa: formaty, stsenarii, teksty // Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2010. T. 50. № 6. S. 28 – 32.
14.
Pantykina M.I. Kontsept «pravovaya zhizn'»: opyt filosofsko-fenomenologicheskoi interpretatsii // Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Ser. 3: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2009. T. 69. № 3. S. 18 – 28.
15.
Polyakov A.V. Kommunikativnyi podkhod v obshchei teorii prava // Problemi filosofiï prava. 2006/2007. T. 4/5. S. 60 – 67.
16.
Rozin V.M. Problema i tri znacheniya sotsial'noi spravedlivosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. 2013. № 4. S. 301-350. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.661. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_661.html
17.
Romashov R.A. Realisticheskii pozitivizm kak intergrativnyi tip sovremennogo pravoponimaniya // Universitets'ki naukovi zapiski. 2007. № 4(24). S. 13 – 20.
18.
Romashov R.A. Realisticheskii pozitivizm: sovremennyi tip integrativnogo pravoponimaniya // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie. 2005. № 1. S. 4-11.
19.
Skorobogatov A.V., Krasnov A.V. Sovremennyi rossiiskii normativizm kak integral'noe pravoponimanie // Normativnaya teoriya Gansa Kel'zena i razvitie yurisprudentsii v Evrope i SShA : (k 40-letiyu so dnya smerti G. Kel'zena) : tezisy dokladov 7-i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Ivanovo, 8-12 oktyabrya 2013 g./ otv. red. E.L. Potseluev. Ivanovo: Ivan. gos. un-t, 2013. S. 34-36.
20.
Chestnov I.L. Posklassicheskaya teoriya prava: Monografiya. SPb.: Alef-Press, 2012. 650 s.
21.
Shapiro I. Begstvo ot real'nosti v gumanitarnykh naukakh / per. s angl. D. Uzlanera. M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2011. 368 s.
22.
Shafirov V.M. Chelovekotsentristskii podkhod k ponimaniyu prava // Pravo Ukrainy. 2011. № 1. S. 101 – 106.
23.
Yuridicheskaya konfliktologiya / otv. red. V. N. Kudryavtsev. M.: Izd-vo IGiP RAN, 1995. 316 c.
24.
Martynov A.V. Sovremennoe pravo i publichnoe upravlenie: problemy metodologii i sootnosheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie.-2013.-4.-C. 1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2013.4.924. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_924.html
25.
Leusenko D.A. Integrativnoe pravoponimanie i geneticheskii metod v yuridicheskoi nauke // Pravo i politika.-2013.-11.-C. 1550-1556. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.11.10117.
26.
V.G. Tarasenko. Podkhod k interpretatsii rossiiskoi-evraziiskoi tsivilizatsii skvoz' prizmu vremeni.. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-№ 12.-C. 99-107.
27.
Leusenko D.A.. Integrativnoe pravoponimanie i geneticheskii metod v yuridicheskoi nauke . // Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 11.-C. 1550-1556. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.11.10117
28.
Leusenko D.A.. Integrativnaya teoriya i geneticheskii metod v poznanii prava B.A. Kistyakovskogo. // Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 12.-C. 1731-1736. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.10403
29.
E.V. Karpova. Ob''ektivnye usloviya vospriyatiya prostranstva v filosofsko-pravovykh predstavleniyakh yusnaturalizma. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-№ 12.-C. 35-44.
30.
Katsapova I.A.. Filosofiya prava v publichnom prostranstve. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-№ 12.-C. 1797-1811. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.12.9662
31.
A.N. Mochkin. Martin Khaidegger v poiskakh metafiziki F. Nitsshe. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-№ 9.-C. 73-82.
32.
Parkhomenko R.N.. Diskussii o liberalizme v sovremennoi Rossii. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-№ 8.-C. 1052-1063. DOI: .10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.9067
33.
I.V. Kirsberg. Kak fenomenologicheski zamaskirovat' bogoslovie pod nauku. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-№ 11.-C. 29-38.
34.
R.N. Parkhomenko. "Metafizicheskii universalizm " Borisa Chicherina. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2012.-№ 9.-C. 8-15
35.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Strukturno-funktsional'nye osobennosti razlichnykh sostoyanii pravosoznaniya cheloveka // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 2. - C. 90 - 116. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_153.html
36.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovoi mentalitet rossiiskikh grazhdan // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 4. - C. 108 - 133. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_310.html
37.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Psikhosotsial'nye formy pravovogo nigilizma cheloveka // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 3. - C. 108 - 148. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_240.html
38.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Dialektika estestvennogo i pozitivnogo prava kak istochnik obshchestvenno-pravovogo progressa // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 221 - 238. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.559. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_559.html
39.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Arkhetipy pravosoznaniya v sisteme pravovoi kul'tury lichnosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2014. - 1. - C. 54 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.1.10486. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10486.html
40.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovaya kul'tura kak ob''ekt nauchnogo issledovaniya: metodologicheskie podkhody, struktura i kriterii otsenki // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 4. - C. 135 - 158. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.635. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_635.html
41.
Babin B.V. Pravo na soprotivlenie kak global'noe pravo. // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 181 - 200. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.817. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_817.html
42.
Parkhomenko R.N. B. Chicherin o prave i printsipe razdeleniya vlastei // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 1. - C. 251 - 284. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.1.395. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_395.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website