Статья 'Особенности земельных отношений в Скандинавских странах' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Specific features of land relations in the Scandinavian states.

Averina Kristina Nikolaevna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law and Process,  The Academy of Public Service and Administration of the Komi Republic

167000, Russia, g. Syktyvkar, ul. Kommunisticheskaya, 11, kab. 508v

akristin@bk.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2014.2.10963

Review date:

04-08-2020


Publish date:

1-2-2014


Abstract.

The article concerns specific features of land relations in Iceland, Norway, Findland and Sweden presented via the analysis of the legislative norms on registration of titles to land, and comparative analysis of types of titles and rights to land. Additionally, attention is paid to the land use categories with due regard to the specificities and main characteristic features of the Scandinavian states. Additionally to the analysis of legislative norms of the said states, the article presents materials on the size of their territory and structure of land funds, as well as the tendencies of development of the proprietary rights in Fennoscandian states.  Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden are traditionally recognized as Scandinavian states. Finland is not a Scandinavian state due to its geographic situation outside the Scandinavian peninsula and its language, however, attention is paid to the land relations in Finland, since this state is traditionally regarded as being part of the Scandinavian economic and cultural territory. Based upon the analysis of legislative norms of such Scandinavian states as Iceland, Norway, Finland and Sweden, the author analyzes the institution of proprietary rights to the land plots.  The author also discusses the main tendencies of development of the land legislation of the above-mentioned states. It is typical for all of these states that the rules for certain types of land use are regulated by the sources, which also regulate the relevant types of activity, and it is noted that the system of such sources is unique for each of these states due to their international economic specialization and traditions in the use of land resources.

Keywords: proprietary right, land relations, owner of the plot of land, use of land, title, collective right, land tenants, owner of the building, cadastral registration, legal servitude
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Statistical Yearbook 2011. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark, 2011. – 525 p.
2.
Fiziko-geograficheskaya strana na severe Evropy, okhvatyvayushchaya territoriyu Skandinavskogo i Kol'skogo poluostrovov, Finlyandii i chasti Karelii. Sm.: Fennoskandiya. Elektronnyi resurs. http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fennoskandiya.
3.
Enemark S., Williamson I., Wallace J. Building Modern Land Administration Systems in Developed Economies // Spatial Science. 2005. Vol. 50. No. 2. P. 51 – 68.
4.
OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Sweden, 2004. OECD Publishing, 2004. P. 200.
5.
OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Finland, 2009. OECD Publishing, 2009. P. 124.
6.
OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Norway, 2011. OECD Publishing, 2011. P. 57.
7.
OECD Environmental Performance Reviews : Finland. OECD, 2009. P. 109 – 111.
8.
Dannelse og transaktioner vedrørende fast ejendom i de nordiske landeKort & Matrikelstyrelsen, 2006. – 588 s.
9.
Cadastral Template 2010(Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003):Denmark.
10.
Country Report (Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003): Norway.
11.
Country Report 2009 (Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003): Finland.
12.
Country Report 2003 (Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003): Sweden
13.
Rednikova T.V.. Okhrana komponentov biologicheskogo raznoobraziya i pravovoe regulirovanie obespecheniya ravnogo dostupa k izvlekaemym iz nikh blagam: realizatsiya polozhenii konventsii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10519.
14.
Sosnovskii V.V.. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye i natsional'nye aspekty okhrany zemel' sredstvami ugolovnogo zakona (Retsenziya na knigu: O.V. Vorontsova. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' za porchu zemli / Otv. red. O.L. Dubovik. Syktyvkar: KRASGiU, 2012. – 175 s.) // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.6955.
15.
O.L. Dubovik. Retsenziya na knigu: Mezhdunarodnoe ekologicheskoe pravo: uchebnik / otv. red. R.M. Valeev. M.: Statut, 2012. – 639 s // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.11.
16.
Nikiforov A.A. Deistvie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov v sfere okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy v natsional'nom prave stran Severnoi Evropy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.10.
17.
Nikiforov. A.A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya okhrana okruzhayushchei sredy v stranakh Severnoi Evropy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
18.
Danel'yan A.A. Rol' mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii v regulirovanii mezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh otnoshenii: opyt, sovremennye problemy i tendentsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
19.
Vorontsova O.V. Politika Evropeiskogo soyuza po okhrane pochv // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107..
20.
P
21.
Babin B.V. Pravo sobstvennosti narodov: mezhdunarodnoe i natsional'noe izmereniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 10. - C. 12 - 34. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9469.html
22.
Babin B.V. Pravo sobstvennosti narodov v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2013. - 3. - C. 300 - 308. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.3.9479.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website