Пакет прикладных программ «МультиМИР»: архитектура и применение

Уразаева Татьяна Альфредовна

doi:10.7256/2306-4196.2014.5.12962


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of Editors > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Cybernetics and programming

Reference:

Urazaeva T.A. — Application package “MultiMIR”: architecture and appliance // Cybernetics and programming. – 2014. – № 5. – P. 34 - 61. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2014.5.12962 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=12962

Application package “MultiMIR”: architecture and appliance

Urazaeva Tatiana Alfredovna

PhD in Economics

Head of the Department of Information Systems in the economy, Volga State University of Technology

424032, Russia, respublika Marii El, g. Ioshkar-Ola, ul. Pavlenko, 60

bor1@mari-el.com

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2306-4196.2014.5.12962

Review date:

02-10-2014

Publish date:

16-10-2014

Abstract.

Evaluation of risks of system development is an urgent task for a for a variety of disciplines such as economics and sociology, technology and ecology, the system studied at the intersection of different disciplines. Often the parameters of such systems are discrete, set of possible states is bounded. The application package “MultiMIR” was designed to evaluate risks of development in such systems. An important difference of “MultiMIR” from other application is in achievement of polynomial computational complexity for some classes of systems, while most analogues offer only exponential complexity. The article describes: purpose of the application, main ideas used as a basis for algorithms, application architecture. The author gives an overview of ways of using the application. The conceptual basis of the theory used in the development of algorithms implemented in “MultiMIR” is in theoretical probabilistic approach. As a specific mathematical apparatus the author has chosen formalism of theory of multisets, which, in author’s opinion, has the richest expressive possibilities for the study in the described the subject area. As a programming system used in the development of the first version of the application the author used VBA-subsystem office with Microsoft Office. The selection of the programming system is dictated by the features and preferences of the primary target of the package: banking and financial analysts. Using “MultiMIR” allowed for the first time to provide accurate calculation of such non-linear measures of risk as expected utility, distorted probability measure, "Value at Risk", and so on for medium and large homogeneous portfolios term financial instruments without involving time-consuming analytical methods. Unlike traditionally used for this purpose Monte Carlo method, approached based on the described above application allows obtaining an exact solution using a comparable amount of CPU resource. “MultiMIR” application can also be used for verification of reliability of the results obtained using Monte Carlo methods considered classical in the financial risk management.
Keywords: system, visual modeling , risk, risk process, measure of risk, Value at Risk, VaR, homogeneous portfolio , term financial instruments, Monte Carlo method
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Borodin, A. V. Arkhitektura informatsionnoi sistemy podderzhki prinyatiya reshenii po upravleniyu personalom roznichnoi podsistemy kommercheskogo banka / A. V. Borodin // Programmnye sistemy i vychislitel'nye metody. – 2014. – №2. – S. 174–190. – DOI: 10.7256/2305–6061.2014.2.12331
2.	Borodin, A. V. Igry na setyakh Petri / A. V. Borodin // Obozrenie prikladnoi i promyshlennoi matematiki. – 2002. – T. 9. – V. 1. – S. 167–168.
3.	Borodin, A. V. Matematicheskie modeli upravleniya kreditnym portfelem kommercheskogo banka / A. V. Borodin. – Ioshkar-Ola: Mariiskii gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskii universitet, 1998. – 168 s.
4.	Borodin, A. V. Modeli upravleniya personalom v roznichnoi podsisteme kommercheskogo banka / A. V. Borodin // Ekonomika i sotsium: sovremennye modeli razvitiya obshchestva v aspekte globalizatsii: materialy III mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (12 fevralya 2014g.). – Saratov: Izdatel'stvo TsPM «Akademiya Biznesa», 2014. – S. 26–30.
5.	Borodin, A. V. Seti Petri s nechetkim povedeniem v zadachakh imitatsionnogo modelirovaniya evolyutsii investitsionnykh i strakhovykh portfelei / A. V. Borodin // Obozrenie prikladnoi i promyshlennoi matematiki. – 2000. – T. 7. – V. 2. – S. 321–322.
6.	Borodin, A. V. Stokhasticheskoe modelirovanie v zadachakh sinteza optimal'nykh topologii setei distributsii tochnogo vremeni / A. V. Borodin, D. R. Zub'yak // Tekhnicheskie nauki — ot teorii k praktike. Sbornik statei po materialam XXXIV mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. № 5 (30). – Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo «SibAK», 2014. – S. 7–15.
7.	Borodin, A. V. Teoretiko-igrovye modeli protsessov riska nad setyami Petri / A. V. Borodin // Modelirovanie i analiz bezopasnosti i riska v slozhnykh sistemakh: Trudy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi shkoly MABR-2006. – SPb.: GOU VPO «SPbGUAP», 2006. – S. 305–307.
8.	Borodin, A. V. Upravlenie HR-protsessom v kommercheskom banke na osnove tekhnologii imitatsionnogo modelirovaniya / A. V. Borodin // Tekhnicheskie nauki — ot teorii k praktike. Sbornik statei po materialam XXXII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. № 3 (28). – Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo «SibAK», 2014. – S. 7–13.
9.	Byudzhetirovanie: shag za shagom / E. Yu. Dobrovol'skii, B. M. Karabanov, P. S. Borovkov i dr. – M.: Piter, 2011. – 480 s.
10.	Grant, K. L. Upravlenie riskami v treidinge: Kak povysit' pribyl'nost' s pomoshch'yu kontrolya nad riskami / K. L. Grant. – M.: Mir, 2005. – 349 s.
11.	Gryazin, N. L. Sovokupnaya stoimost' vladeniya kak kriterii optimal'nosti arkhitektury sluzhby distributsii tochnogo vremeni v sistemakh SDR-svyazi na baze oborudovaniya kompanii Symmetricom / N. L. Gryazin, A. V. Borodin // Informatsionnye tekhnologii v ekonomike, obrazovanii i biznese: materialy V mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (23 dekabrya 2013 g.). – Saratov: Izdatel'stvo TsPM «Akademiya Biznesa», 2013. – S. 39–41.
12.	Dzhekel, P. Primenenie metodov Monte-Karlo v finansakh / P. Dzhekel. – M.: Internet-treiding, 2004. – 263 s.
13.	Ermakov, S. M. Metod Monte-Karlo v vychislitel'noi matematike. Vvodnyi kurs / S. M. Ermakov. – SPb.: Nevskii Dialekt, Binom. Laboratoriya znanii, 2009. – 192 s.
14.	Ivashkovskaya, I. V. Kapitalizatsiya: krakh ili vtoroe rozhdenie? / I. V. Ivashkovskaya. – M.: Mezhdunarodnyi universitet v Moskve, 2009. – 38 s.
15.	Urazaeva, T. A. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema vizual'nogo modelirovaniya risk-protsessov institutsional'noi ekonomiki / T. A. Urazaeva // Modelirovanie i analiz bezopasnosti i riska v slozhnykh sistemakh: Trudy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi shkoly MA BR-2006. – SPb.: GOU VPO «SPbGU-AP», 2006. – S. 284-291.
16.	Urazaeva, T. A. Algebra riskov / T. A. Urazaeva. – Ioshkar-Ola: Povolzhskii gosudarstvennyi tekhnologicheskii universitet, 2013. – 209 s.
17.	Urazaeva, T. A. Metodologiya modelirovaniya riska portfelei srochnykh finansovykh instrumentov / T. A. Urazaeva // Audit i finansovyi analiz. – 2010. – № 5 – S. 456-465.
18.	Urazaeva, T. A. Modeli svyazannykh zaemshchikov v notatsii diagramm deyatel'nosti UML / T. A. Urazaeva // Upravlenie konkurentosposobnost'yu regiona: strategii, modeli, informatsionno-analiticheskoe obespechenie: Regional'naya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya. Ch. 1. – Ioshkar-Ola: MarGTU, 2011. – S. 202-206.
19.	Urazaeva, T. A. Paket prikladnykh programm «Mul'tiMir» v praktike analiza kreditnogo riska / T. A. Urazaeva // VIII Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-metodicheskaya konferentsiya «Sovershenstvovanie podgotovki IT-spetsialistov po napravleniyu «Prikladnaya informatika» dlya innovatsionnoi ekonomiki»: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. – M.: Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet ekonomiki, statistiki i informatiki, 2012. – S. 182-186.
20.	Urazaeva, T. A. Sintaksicheskaya model' yazyka vizual'nogo predstavleniya razvivayushchikhsya ekonomik / T. A. Urazaeva // Obozrenie prikladnoi i promyshlennoi matematiki. – 2006. – T. 13. – V. 1. – S. 147-149.
21.	Urazaeva, T. A. Finansovye riski: algebraicheskaya model' ischisleniya / T. A. Urazaeva // Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. – 2010. – № 2(137). – S. 33-35.
22.	Arora, S. Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach / S. Arora, V. Barak. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. – 579 p.
23.	Papadimitriou, C. H. Computational complexity / C. H. Papadimitriou. – New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1994. – 523 p.
24.	Hornby, D. Consolidation in the data center: simplifying IT environments to reduce total cost of ownership / D. Hornby, K. Pepple. – Santa Clara, CA: Sun Microsystems, 2003. – 205 p.
25.	Sipser, M. Introduction to the Theory of Computation / M. Sipser. – Boston: Thomson Course Technology, 2006. – 431 p.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.