|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:
Kadyrov R.R. —
The outskirts of the Crimean Khanate (on the question of the mainland territories of the Crimean Khanate)
// Genesis: Historical research.
– 2022. – № 6.
– P. 63 - 71.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2022.6.38283 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=38283
The outskirts of the Crimean Khanate (on the question of the mainland territories of the Crimean Khanate)
Kadyrov Rasim Reshatovich
lecturer of the Department of History, SBEEHE RC «F. Yakubov Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University».
Head of the Museum of History and Archeology as a department of the SBE RC «Crimean Tatar Museum of Cultural and Historical Heritage».
295001, Russia, respublika Krym, g. Simferopol', per. Uchebnyi, 8
|
rasimkadyrov929@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Другие публикации этого автора |
|
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2022.6.38283
Review date:
12-06-2022
Publish date:
19-06-2022
Abstract: The article deals with issues related to the development of the possessions of the Crimean Khanate of the XV-XVIII centuries. Located outside the Crimean Peninsula, which, unfortunately, with the exception of a few researches, have not received proper coverage in historical literature. Among them are the processes of expanding territorial borders, the emergence of settlements and issues of administrative management. To cover this topic, materials from written and cartographic sources were involved, as well as the achievements of historians who touched on issues of historical geography were used. In the course of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that, unlike the territory of the Crimean Peninsula, where an agricultural culture was formed, contributing to the development of an administrative system with clear delineations into districts, the mainland possessions of the Khans were inhabited by nomads, in which the traditional order of governance was preserved. Nevertheless, we cannot say that the vast territory from the Dniester to the Don was considered by the Tatars exclusively as a place of nomadic grazing. Analysis of the sources showed the presence of stationary settlements and fortifications on the banks of the Dnieper River, which indicates the cultural development of these lands. For the Crimean Khans, the preservation and expansion of dominance in the forest-steppe zone of Eastern Europe was extremely important, since it strengthened the security of the interior of the country and expanded the military capabilities of the state due to the migration of nomads to these territories. In addition, the Khanate controlled overland trade routes leading to the Black Sea ports on the peninsula.
Keywords:
Black Sea steppes, administrative structure, Nogai Horde, Crimea, Edichkul, Edisan, Budjak, historical geography, borderlands, Crimean khanate
This article is automatically translated. You can find full text of article in Russian
here.
References
1.
|
Abduzhemilev R.R. Administrativno-territorial'noe delenie Krymskogo hanstva // Istorija krymskih tatar v 5 t. T.3 Krymskoe hanstvo v XV-XVIII vv. Kazan': Institut istorii im. Sh.Mardzhani AN RT, 2021. S.420-425
|
2.
|
Beleckaja O.V. Balyklej v XIV –XVI vekah (materialy k izucheniju istoricheskoj geografii Podolii i Severnogo Prichernomor'ja) // Zolotoordynskaja civilizacija. 2017. № 10. S.398-408
|
3.
|
Bert'e-Delagard A. L. K voprosu o mestonahozhdenii Mavrokastrona («Zapis-ki gotskogo toparha») // Zapiski Odesskogo obshhestva istorii i drevnostej. T. 33. – Odessa, 1919. S. 1-20.
|
4.
|
Boplan G.L. Opisanie Ukrainy / Per. o. Z. P. Borisjuk; izd. A.L. Horoshkevich, E.N. Jushhenko. Moskva: Drevnehranilishhe, 2004.
|
5.
|
Gordeev A. Ju. Kartografija Chernogo i Azovskogo morej: retrospektiva. Period 1500-1600. Kiev, 2006.
|
6.
|
Gribovskij V.V. Hanskaja Ukraina // Kazachestvo v tjurkskom i slavjanskom mirah / otv. red. V. V. Gribovskij, V. V. Trepavlov; Institut arheologii im. A. H. Halikova AN RT. – Kazan', 2018.
|
7.
|
Gribovskij V.V. Vladenija Krymskogo hanstva ot Kubani do Budzhaka// Isto-rija krymskih tatar v 5 t. T.3 Krymskoe hanstvo v XV-XVIII vv. Kazan': Institut istorii im. Sh.Mardzhani AN RT, 2021. S.357-371
|
8.
|
Dovzhenok V.J. Tatars'ke mіsto na Nizhn'omu Dnіprі chasіv pіzn'ogo seredn'ovіchchja. // Arheologichni pam’jatki USSR T. X, 1961. S. 175-193
|
9.
|
Dokumenty Krymskogo hanstva iz sobranija Husejna Fejzhanova / sost. i translit. R.R. Abduzhemilev; nauch. red. I. Mirgaleev. Simferopol': OOO «Konstanta», 2017.
|
10.
|
Inal'dzhik H. Otrazhenie v titulature silovyh vzaimootnoshenij mezhdu Rossiej, Krymom i Osmanskoj imperiej / Inal'dzhik H.; per. c angl. Sejthalilova L. S. // Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie. 2019. № 2. S. 86–107.
|
11.
|
Kadyrov R.R. Ulug Urda ve Desht-i-Kipchak: sakral'noe i material'noe v granicah i vladenijah krymskih hanov // XXIII Bosporskie chtenija. Bospor Kimmerijskij i varvarskij mir v period antichnosti i srednevekov'ja Sakral'noe i material'noe. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii.-Simferopol'-Kerch', 2022. S. 121-127
|
12.
|
Lashkov F.F. Istoricheskij ocherk krymsko-tatarskogo zemlevladenija (prodolzhenie) // ITUAK № 22. – Simferopol': tipografija Tavricheskogo gubernskogo pravlenija, 1895. S.35-81
|
13.
|
Papkov A.I. Dnepro-Donskaja lesostep' kak jetnokontaktnaja zona: Rossija, Krymskoe hanstvo i Rech' Pospolitaja // Tractus Aevorum №1. 2014. S. 106-126
|
14.
|
Pivorovich V. B. K voprosu o chekanke monet Mengli Gireja I na territorii kreposti Balykleja na reke Juzhnyj Bug // VNU. – Ch. ІІІ. Ulus Dzhuchi, Krymskoe hanstvo i sopredel'nye gosudarstva v XIII–XVIII vv. Kiev: Logos, 2013. S. 76-79
|
15.
|
Pilipchuk Ja.V. Tatarskaja politika Kazimira IV, 1480–1492 // Zolotoordynskaja Civilizacija. Vyp.8 — Kazan', 2015. C. 312-325.
|
16.
|
Sbornik statisticheskih svedenij po Tavricheskoj Gubernii / pod red. K. A. Vernera. T.IX. Simferopol', 1889.
|
17.
|
Smirnov V. D. Krymskoe hanstvo XIII–XV vv. / V. D. Smirnov – M.: «VEChE», 1887.
|
18.
|
Syroechkovskij V.E. Gosti-Surozhane // Izvestija Gosudarstvennoj Akademii Istorii Material'noj Kul'tury imeni N.Ja. Marra. Vyp. 127. M-L: OGIZ, 1935.
|
19.
|
Trepavlov V. V. Stepnoj shhit Jurta: formirovanie nogajskogo naselenija Krymskogo hanstva (XVI – pervaja polovina XVII v.) // Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie. 2019. № 2. S. 108–125.
|
20.
|
Fomenko I.K. Evropejskie kartograficheskie istochniki // Istorija krymskih tatar v 5 t. T.3 Krymskoe hanstvo v XV-XVIII vv. Kazan': Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, 2021. S.203-214
|
21.
|
Chelebi Je. Kniga puteshestvija. Krym i sopredel'nye oblasti: Izvlechenija iz sochinenija tureckogo puteshestvennika XVII veka. Vyp. 1: Zemli Moldavii i Ukrainy / Otv. red. A. S. Tveritinova. Institut narodov Azii. ‒ M., 1961.
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|