|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:
Cherkasov A.V., Kozlov M.N. —
Historiographical facts and historiographical sources in the study of the Paleolithic Era of the Crimean region
// Genesis: Historical research.
– 2022. – № 4.
– P. 23 - 32.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2022.4.37795 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=37795
Historiographical facts and historiographical sources in the study of the Paleolithic Era of the Crimean region
Cherkasov Aleksey Vladimirovich
ORCID: 0000-0002-0331-7674
PhD in Pedagogy
Associate Professor of the Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines, Branch of the Admiral F. F. Ushakov State Maritime University in Sevastopol
298609, Russia, Respublika Krym oblast', g. Yalta, ul. Timiryazeva, 27
|
cherkasov.alexei1976@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Kozlov Mikhail Nikolaevich
Doctor of History
Professor, Department of History, Sevastopol State University
299053, Russia, g. Sevastopol', ul. Universitetskaya, 33
|
cherkasov.alexei1976@gmail.com
|
|
 |
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2022.4.37795
Review date:
05-04-2022
Publish date:
25-04-2022
Abstract: The subject of this publication is an analysis of the content and nature of the categories "historical source", "historiographical fact", "historiographical source" in relation to the problems of Paleolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic studies of the Crimean region in the second half of the XIX - XX centuries. The research methodology is based on the complex application of key scientific principles: historicism, logical interrelation, objectivity, comparative historical approach, retrospection. The problem field and structure of the article includes: the specification of the conceptual and categorical tools for the historiographical study of the Stone Age of the Crimean region, the formulation of priority issues of the primitive archeology of the peninsula, as well as a comparative characterization of the corpus of relevant historiographical and historical sources. From the authors' point of view, a historiographical view of the phenomenon of the formation and development of regional primitive archaeology allows us to more accurately describe the process of its genesis, identify and characterize nominational directions in research, give biographical portraits of scientists and researchers of ancient history, identify social, organizational and scientific factors influencing the process of knowledge formation. In other words, the new role of historiography of archaeology, together with the cognitive capabilities of the history as a science, creates a favorable opportunity not only to study the history of Russian archaeological knowledge, but also contributes to clarifying the methodological foundations of this direction.
Keywords:
history of science, historical fact, historiographical source, historiographical fact, historiographical analysis, primitive monument, historical source, Stone Age of Crimea, primitive archaeology, scientist 's personality
This article is automatically translated. You can find full text of article in Russian
here.
References
1.
|
Alekseev, V. P. (1989). Historical anthropology and ethnogenesis. M.: Nauka.
|
2.
|
Barg, M. A. (1984). Categories and methods of historical science. M., 162.
|
3.
|
Bunak, V. V. (1980) The genus Homo, its origin and subsequent evolution. Moscow: Nauka.
|
4.
|
Gurevich, A. Ya. (1998). Aporia of modern historical science: authentic and imaginary. Odyssey: man in history. Moscow, 246.
|
5.
|
Danilevsky, I. N., Kabanov, V. V., Medushevskaya, O. M., Rumyantseva, M. F. (1998). Source studies: Theory. History. Method. Sources of Russian history. Moscow: RSUH, Open Society Institute, 85.
|
6.
|
Zhukov, E. M. (1980). Essays on the methodology of history. Moscow: Nauka, 205 – 215.
|
7.
|
Zevelev, A. I., Naumov, V. P. (1980). Historiographical fact: evaluation criteria and analysis. Questions of history. 5, 36.
|
8.
|
Ippolitov, G. M. (2011). Classification of sources in problem-thematic historiographical studies and some methodological approaches to their analysis. Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2011. Vol. 13. No.3 (2), 506.
|
9.
|
Isachkin, S. P. (2004). Historiography of Siberian Social democracy 1907-1917: Abstract. diss. … Doctor of H.S. Omsk, 9.
|
10.
|
Source studies of the modern history of Russia: theory, methodology and practice (2005). M.
|
11.
|
Kuzminov, P. A. (2010). Russian historiography of the reforms of the 50-70s of the XIX century in the North Caucasus: Abstract of the dissertation. ... Doctors of Historical Sciences: 07.00.09. Maykop: ASU, 46.
|
12.
|
Kuzminov, P. A. (2011) The epoch of transformations of the 50 – 70s of the XIX century among the peoples of the North Caucasus in the latest historiography. Nalchik: LLC «Printing Yard», 154 – 155.
|
13.
|
Kurnosov, A. A. (1977). Personality in history, history in personality. History of the USSR. 1977. Vol. 4, 198.
|
14.
|
Nechkina, M. V. (1965) History of history: (some methodological issues of historical science). History and Historians. Historiography of the history of the USSR: collection of articles. M., 1965. 6 – 26.
|
15.
|
Pershits, A. I., Mongayt, A. L., Alekseev, V. P. (1982). History of primitive society. Moscow: Higher School, 223.
|
16.
|
Podolskaya, N. V. (1988) Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology / Ed. A.V. Superanskaya. M.: Nauka, 192.
|
17.
|
The Soviet periodical press as a historical source. Moscow: MSU, 1974, 64.
|
18.
|
Khramkova, E. L. (2001). Culture of Russia during the Great Patriotic War. 1941 – 1945: historiographical essays. Samara, 5 – 6.
|
19.
|
Chernomorsky, M. N. (1976). Source studies of the history of the USSR: the Soviet period. M.,121.
|
20.
|
Schmidt, S. O. (1997). The Path of the historian: selected works on source studies and historiography. Moscow: RSUH, 612.
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|