Статья 'Учреждение института понтификата в Древнем Риме в интерпретации Тита Ливия: политико-правовой аспект ' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research

Appointment of the institution of pontificate in Ancient Rome in interpretation of Titus Livius: political-legal aspect

Borovkov Pavel Sergeevich

PhD in History

Docent, the department of History of State and Law, Liberal Arts University

620026, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Karla-Marksa, 30, kv. 4




Review date:


Publish date:


Abstract: This article examines the passages of Titus Livius’ first book dedicated to the College of Pontiffs. The author provides arguments regarding the correlation between this fragment and more ancient narrative and documental sources dated back to pontifical weather notes and other priestly documents. Attention is focused on terminology of the ancient author applied for characteristics of legal prerogatives of pontificate, mechanisms of its cooperation with government authorities, provisions of archaic legislation on the questions of religious development of the Roman civitas. The work employs special legal and cross-disciplinary methods, which allowed carrying out an authentic reconstruction of the concepts, interpretation of the perceptions of the government, law and religion inherent to the political-legal thought of Ancient Rome. In interpretation of Titus Livius, the laws of Numa Pompilius on the priesthood manifests as sequential reforms aimed at the establishment of the institutions of administration and formation of public-legal relations in the archaic Rome. In combination with other ancient texts, the lore of Titus Livius on the appointment of pontificate can be carefully used as a starting point for retrospective research of the evolution of political-legal prerogatives of priesthood and establishment of the institutions of public law in Ancient Rome.

Keywords: jus pontificium, sacra publica, roman law, civitas, priesthood, pontifex maximus, Numa Pompilius, collegia pontificium, Pontifex, Titus Livius
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Дворецкий И. Х. Латинско-русский словарь : ок. 200 000 слов и словосочетаний. – 6-е изд., стер. – М. : Русский язык, 2000. – 843 с.
Самохина Г. С. Древний Рим: основные аспекты политико-правового развития : учеб.-метод. пособие. – Петрозаводск : Изд-во Петрозав. гос. ун-та, 2004. – 219 с.
Сморчков А. М. Религия и власть в Римской Республике: магистраты, жрецы, храмы. – М. : РГГУ, 2012. – 601 с.
Шайд Дж. Религия римлян / пер. с фр. О. Смирновой. – М. : Новое изд-во, 2006. – 277 с.
Szemler G. J. The Priests of the Roman Republic. – Brussels, 1972.
Cameron A. Gratian's Repudiation of the Pontifical Robe // The Journal of Roman Stu-dies. – 1968. – Vol. 58, Issue 1-2. – P. 96–102
Drews R. Pontiffs, Prodigies, and the Disappearance of the «Annales Maximi» // Clas-sical Philology. – 1988. – Vol. 83, № 4. – P. 289–299.
Hickson F.V. Roman prayer language: Livy and the Aeneid of Virgil.-Stuttgart, 1993.
Grilli A. Politica, cultura e filosofia in Roma antica. – Napoli, 2015.
Forsythe G. Livy and Early Rome. A Study in Historical Method and Judgment. – Stuttgart, 2017.
Latte K. Römische Religionsgeschichte. – München, 1960.
Liebeschuetz W. The religious position of Livy’s history // The Journal of Roman Stu-dies. – 1967. – Vol. 57, Issue 1-2. – P. 45–55.
McDonald A. H. The style of Livy // The Journal of Roman Studies. – 1957. –Vol. 47, Issue 1-2. – P. 155–172.
Peruzzi E. Origini di Roma. Vol. II : Le lettere. – Bologna, 1973.
Rawson E. Prodigy Lists and the Use of the Annales Maximi // The Classical Quarterly. – 1971. – Vol. 21, Issue 1. – P. 158–169.
Ogilvie R.M.A Commentary on Livy: Books 1–5. – Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1965. – 788 p.
Oxford Latin Dictionary. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1968. – 2400 p.
Oxford Classical Dictionary / Ed. by N. G. L. Hammond., H. H. Scullard. – Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1968.
Rinolfi C. Livio: pontefici, sacra, ius sacrum // Diritto and Storia. 2005. № 4.
Rupke J. Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change. Empire and After Series. – Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. 336 p.
Sini F. Documenti sacerdotali di Roma antica. – Sasari : Libreria Dessì Editrice, 1983. – 234 p. 20. Sini F. Diritto internazionale romano (riflessioni su fides, bellum, hostis, pax) // Ivs Antiqvvm. – 2003. – № 12. – URL: http://www.dirittoestoria.it/iusantiquum/articles/Sini-Varr. de-ling-lat-5-86.htm 21. Tansey P. The inauguration of Lentulus Niger // American Journal of Philology. – 2000. – Vol. 121, № 2. – P. 237–258.
Tondo S. Appunti sulla giurisprudenza pontificale // Per la storia del pensiero giuridico romano: Dall’età dei pontefici alla scuola di Servio : atti del seminario di S. Marino, 7–9 gennaio 1993. – Torino, 1993.
Watson A. The state, law and religion: pagan Rome. Georgia, 1992
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website