по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Reformative Draft Law as a Tool for Developing the Russian Legal Culture of the XIXth Century
Dunaeva Natalya Viktorovna

Doctor of Law

professor of the Department of the Theory and History of Law and State at National Research University 'Higher School of Economics' (branch in St. Petersburg)

190008, Russia, Saint Petersburg, str. Soyuza Pechatnikov, 16

natdunaeva@yandex.ru

Abstract.

Subject of the present article are the legal ideas and bills directed on reforming of the public relations upon transition from agrarian to industrial society in Russia in the second half of the XIX century.The author in detail considers such aspects of a subject as the theoretical bases of lawmaking in a transition period, including in aspect of interaction of tradition and an innovation; a role of legislative impact of the state on rates and quality of reforming of the social relations upon transition from evolution, agrarian to an industrial stage; reformatory potential of unrealized bills on the example of the bill "About Application of Provisions on February 19, 1861 to Peasants Monarchic, Specific, Palace" of October 27, 1861. Methods are used: general scientific methods (dialectic, system, ascensions from abstract to concrete, unities of historical and logical research and others) and chastnonauchny methods, including, in the field of jurisprudence (concrete historical, the sociocultural analysis, social and legal modeling, legallistic, comparative and legal and others). The historical and legal analysis of the specified bill in the context of legal culture of transitional society allows to carry it to the significant phenomena of the Russian legal culture of the XIX century and to highly appreciate both the reformatory potential of this little-known bill, and level of sense of justice and professional legal culture of his developers.

DOI:

10.7256/2306-420X.2014.6.13782

Article was received:

22-11-2014


Review date:

23-11-2014


Publish date:

25-11-2014


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Naprimer, takikh avtorov, kak G. I. Avtsinova, A. S. Andreichenko, I. I. Balakleets, G. G. Bernatskii, A. S. Bondarev, A. Bosyatski, N. V. Varlamova, N. Yu. Gur'yanov, A. I. Guseinov, A. A. Dorskaya, S. B. Zinkovskii, Z. N. Kalandarishvili, V. N. Kartashov, E.M. Krupenya, L. E. Lapteva, L. S. Mamut, G. I. Muromtsev, M. V. Nemytina, R. A. Romashov i drugikh.
2.
Sm., naprimer, raboty I. A. Isaeva, S. V. Kodana, N. I. Lesnovoi, D. A. Pashentseva, N. A. Proskuryakovoi, V. A. Tomsinova, T. V. Shatkovskoi i drugikh.
3.
Sm., naprimer, raboty E. D. Blagodetelevoi, A. A. Guseinova, S. M. Kalashnikova, A. M. Marinovoi, B. N. Mironova, V. V. Shelokhaeva, V. N. Shul'gina i drugikh.
4.
Dissertatsionnuyu rabotu E. Yu. Supruna, pretenduyushchuyu na obobshchenie otechestvennogo opyta pravotvorchestva v periody naibolee krupnykh reform XVIII–XX vv., vryad li mozhno schitat' isklyucheniem. – Sm.: Suprun E. Yu. Pravotvorchestvo v reformatsionnye periody istorii Rossii: avtoref. dis. …. kand. yurid. nauk; spets. 12.00.01 / E. Yu. Suprun; Mosk. un-t MVD Rossii. M., 2006.
5.
Sm.: Syrykh E. V. Obshchie kriterii kachestva zakona: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk; spets. 12.00.01 / E. V. Syrykh; In-t zak-va i sravnit. pravoved pri Pravitel'stve Ross. Federatsii. M., 2001. S. 23–24.
6.
Tam zhe. S. 27.
7.
Sorokin V. V. Kontseptsiya evolyutsionnogo razvitiya pravovoi sistemy v perekhodnyi period: avtoref. dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk; spets. 12.00.01 / V. V. Sorokin; Ural. gosudarstv. yurid. akademiya. Ekaterinburg, 2003. S. 10.
8.
Sm.: Statisticheskie tablitsy Rossiiskoi imperii. Vyp. 1–2 / Min-¬vo vnutr. del. Tsentr. statist. kom­t; A. B. Bushen. SPb.: Tip. MVD, 1863. Vyp. 2. S. 262–264, 306; Klyuchevskii V. O. Russkaya istoriya. M.: EKSMO, 2006. S. 891.
9.
Sm.: Vasil'chikov A. I. Zemlevladenie i zemledelie v Rossii i drugikh evropeiskikh gosudarstvakh. 2-e izd. T. 1. SPb.: Tip. M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1881; Kovalevskii M. M. Proshloe i nastoyashchee krest'yanskogo zemleustroistva // Vestnik Evropy. 1911. Kn. 5. S. 234–264; Taranovskii F. V. Feodalizm v Rossii // Varshavskie universitetskie izvestiya. 1902. № 4. Otd. 3. S. 38–39.
10.
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii. Sobranie 2-e. T. 31. № 30693; T. 32. № 32000, 32277; T. 33. № 32674, 32910, 33326, 33724; T. 34. № 35023, 35235; T. 35. № 35611; T. 36. № 34489a i dr.
11.
Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv (dalee – RGIA). F. 1180. T. 15. D. 90. L. 161, 164 ob.–165, 325 ob.–326 ob. i drugie.
12.
Ob otvode gosudarstvennym krest'yanam otdel'nykh khozyaistvennykh uchastkov na prave dolgovremennogo pol'zovaniya // Zhurnal Ministerstva gosudarstvennykh imushchestv. 1859. № 9. Otd. III. S. 5–6.
13.
Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii (dalee – GA RF). F. 722. Op. 1. D. 343; Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv (dalee – RGIA). F. 515. Op. 76. D. 449. L. 24–42 ob.; Rossiiskaya Natsional'naya Biblioteka. Kollektsiya pechatnykh materialov, podgotovlennykh dlya rassmotreniya v Gosudarstvennom Sovete v period podgotovki krest'yanskoi reformy. – Rossiya. Gosudarstvennyi Sovet. Sekretnyi i Glavnyi Komitety po krest'yanskomu delu. Glavnyi Komitet ob ustroistve sel'skogo sostoyaniya. Materialy [Konvolyuty]. V 31 t. T. 14. Al. 3, 4, 8–20.
14.
Sm., naprimer: Istoriya udelov za stoletie ikh sushchestvovaniya. 1797–1897. V 3-kh t. T. 2. SPb.: Tip. Glavnogo upravleniya udelov, 1902. T. 2. S. 533; Lyashchenko P. I. Ocherki agrarnoi evolyutsii Rossii. SPb., 1913. T. 2. Ch. 1. S. 190–191, 303–304.
15.
Sm. podrobnee: Dunaeva N. V. Udel'nye krest'yane kak sub''ekty prava Rossiiskoi imperii (konets XVIII – pervaya polovina XIX v.). SPb.: Biblioteka akademii nauk, 2006.
16.
Lakonichnost' pri opredelenii spetsifiki zakona perekhodnogo perioda podcherknul V. V. Sorokin: «V perekhodnyi period nuzhno otkazat'sya ot skrupuleznoi detalizatsii zakonov. Izlishnyaya formalizatsiya prava v perekhodnyi period pererastaet v nerazumnuyu zaregulirovannost' otnoshenii, pri kotoroi skovyvaetsya tvorcheskaya initsiativa sub''ektov prava, isklyuchaetsya vozmozhnost' ucheta konkretnykh obstoyatel'stv, vybora naibolee optimal'nykh reshenii. Tsennost' formal'noi opredelennosti prava dolzhna byt' sorazmernoi usloviyam deistviya perekhodnogo prava. – Sorokin V. V. Kontseptsiya evolyutsionnogo razvitiya pravovoi sistemy v perekhodnyi period: avtoref. dis. … S. 48.
17.
RGIA. F. 911. Op. 1. D. 11. L. 12.
18.
Tam zhe. L. 12 ob.
19.
Zhurnaly Glavnogo komiteta ob ustroistve sel'skogo sostoyaniya. T. 1. Pg., 1918. S. 253–261; Istoriya udelov za stoletie ikh sushchestvovaniya ... T. 2. S. 530–531.
20.
RGIA. F. 515. Op. 76. D. 449. L. 24–42 ob.
21.
RGIA. F. 911. Op. 1. D. 11. L. 14 ob.
22.
RGIA. F. 515. Op. 76. D. 448. L. 24–27.
23.
GA RF. F. 722. Op. 1. D. 343. L. 14 ob.–15.
24.
Rep'eva A.M. Obshchestvenno-politicheskie vzglyady V.V. Bervi-Flerovskogo v obshchenatsional'nom kontekste // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 112 - 125. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.10368.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website