по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Socio-Cultural Area Studies: Concerning the Problem of Method
Smirnova Galina Evgen'evna

PhD in Cultural Studies

Associate Professor of the Department of Area Studies at Lomonosov Moscow State University. 

119192, Russia, Moscow, Lomonosovskii pr-t, d. 31, korp. 1

smirnova_ge@list.ru

Abstract.

A typical tendency in science of XX century was the integration of scientific knowledge which was particularly reflected in interaction between sciences, exchange of methods and development of an  interdisciplinary approach to scientific research. As a consequence, different branches and majors have been generalized within one scientific discipline. A good example is socio-cultural area studies which has been formed as a natural result of developing area studies. One of the most important goals related to implementation of socio-cultural area studies into the system of scientific knowledge is to develop the theory of this branch of science, including research methods and tecnniques. The given article is particularly devoted to developing and implementing the method of comparative analysis in socio-cultura area studies. Based on a concrete example , i.e. analysis of the term 'motherland' in Russia and Great Britain, because this term plays an important role in mentality of any nation and serves as one of the most important self-identification tools, the author shows opportunities and prospects of using comparative studies as a research method. 

Keywords: area studies, socio-cultural area studies, research methods, interdisciplinary methods, comparative analysis, comparative studies

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.645

Article was received:

21-10-2019


Review date:

21-10-2019


Publish date:

1-6-2013


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Pavlovskaya A.V. Spetsial'nost' «regionovedenie» na fakul'tete inostrannykh yazykov i regionovedeniya MGU im. M.V Lomonosova: itogi i perspektivy // Aktual'nye voprosy regionovedeniya. Vyp. II. M., 2007. S. 8.
2.
Tam zhe.
3.
Sm., napr.: Holt R., Turner J., The methodology of comparative research, N. Y., 1970; Przeworski A., Teune N., The logic of comparative social inquiry. N.Y., 1970; Koval'chenko I.D. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya. M., 1987; Regin Ch. Osobennosti komparativistiki // Sovremennaya sravnitel'naya politologiya. M., 1997; Pivovar E.I. Teoreticheskie problemy istoricheskikh issledovanii. M., 2002. Vyp.
4.
Burlak S.A., Starostin S.A. Vvedenie v lingvisticheskuyu komparativistiku. M., 2001. S. 4-5.
5.
Reformatorskii A.A. Vvedenie v yazykovedenie. M., 1996. S. 212-215.
6.
Sm., napr.: Vashchenko A.V. Sravnitel'naya mifologiya. Chast' 1-2. Proekt «Akademiya», 2011 // http://www.tvkultura.ru/issue.html?id=114088; Zhirmunskii V.M. Srednevekovaya literatura kak predmet sravnitel'nogo literaturovedeniya // Izvestiya AN SSSR. Otdelenie literatury i yazyka. M., 1971. T. XXX. Vyp. 3. S. 185 – 197; Neupokoeva I.G. Problemy vzaimodeistviya sovremennykh literatur. M., 1963.
7.
Ivanova M.V., Shtan'ko M.A. Vvedenie v regionovedenie. Metody regionovedcheskikh issledovanii. Tomsk, 2007. S. 33.
8.
Ob etom podrobnee sm.: Selunskaya N.B. Problemy metodologii istorii. M., 2003.
9.
Melkonyan E.L. Problemy sravnitel'nogo metoda v istoricheskom znanii. Erevan, 1981. S. 49.
10.
Karagodin A.V., Petrova O.S., Selunskaya N.B. Kolichestvennye metody v istoricheskikh issledovaniyakh. M., 2012.
11.
Sm.: Il'in M.V. Sravnitel'naya politologiya: nauchnaya komparativistika v sisteme nauchnogo znaniya // Polis. № 4. 2001.; Zaznaev O.I. Osnovy sravnitel'noi politologii. Kazan', 2009.
12.
Golosov G.V. Sravnitel'naya politologiya. SPb., 2001. S. 339.
13.
MacIntyre A. Is a Science of Comparative Politics Possible? // Philosophy, Politics, and Society. Oxford, 1972.
14.
Smelzer N. Dzh. O komparativnom analize, mezhdistsiplinarnosti i internatsionalizatsii v sotsiologii // Sotsis. 2004. № 11. S. 2-3.
15.
Pis'mo Richarda Chansellora k svoemu dyade Kristoferu Frontingemu. 1554. Arkhangel'sk, 1998. S. 38, 50.
16.
Karamzin N.M. Pis'ma russkogo puteshestvennika. L., 1984. S. 384.
17.
Ovchinnikov V.V. Sakura i Dub. M., 2005. S. 160.
18.
Pod regionom v dannom kontekste ponimaem stranu, naprimer, Velikobritaniyu i Rossiyu.
19.
Elistratov V.S. Regionovedenie. Ishchite termin // Aktual'nye problemy regionovedeniya. Vyp. I. M., 2004. S. 74.
20.
Koval'chenko I.D., Tishkov V.A. Itogi i perspektivy primeneniya kolichestvennykh metodov v sovetskoi i amerikanskoi istoriografii // Kolichestvennye metody v sovetskoi i amerikanskoi istoriografii. M., 1983. S. 15.
21.
Sm. ob etom: Smirnova G.E. Ponyatie «otechestvo» v angliiskoi i russkoi kul'turakh XVIII veka. Diss. na soisk. uch.st. kand. kul'turologii. M., 2003.
22.
G.E. Smirnova. Sravnitel'nyi analiz v sotsiokul'turnom regionovedenii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.14.
23.
V. V. Zakharov. Peremeshchennye arkhivnye fondy nemetskogo proiskhozhdeniya v tsentral'nykh arkhivakh Rossii i perspektivy ikh ispol'zovaniya v khode prepodavaniya istorii i regionovedeniya Germanii v vuzakh. // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2011. – № 1
24.
Demetradze M.R. Sotsiokul'turnaya osnova mezhdistsiplinarnoi metodologii sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh nauk // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 12. - C. 17 - 40. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.12.10727. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10727.html
25.
Demetradze M.R. Preimushchestva sotsiokul'turnoi osnovy mezhdistsiplinarnosti sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh nauk. Sposoby sootvetstviya nauchno-obrazovatel'noi sistemy standartam informatsionnogo obshchestva. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2014. - 2. - C. 22 - 40. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.2.10736. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10736.html
26.
Kuchinov A.M. Analiz sotsiokul'turnykh faktorov politiki: poiski novykh teorii i metodov // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 72 - 121. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.412. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_412.html
27.
Popov E.A. Sotsiokul'turnaya situatsiya v sovremennom rossiiskom regione i munitsipal'nom obrazovanii: sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya, natsional'no-kul'turnaya, dukhovno-konsolidiruyushchaya i etnosotsial'naya spetsifika // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 2. - C. 269 - 321. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.2.362. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_362.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website