Статья 'Методологические аспекты процесса цифровизации системы образования в XXI веке ' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Methodological Aspects of the Process of Digitization of the Education System in the XXI Century

Dianov Sergei Aleksandrovich

Doctor of History

Professor, Department of Public Administration and History, Perm National Research Polytechnic University; Professor, Department of Private Law, Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

614990, Russia, Perm Krai, Perm, Komsomolsky Prospekt str., 29

sadianov@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 
Lesevitskii Aleksei Vladimirovich

Teacher, Perm branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

614077, Russia, Perm Krai, Perm, Gagarina str., 50

lesev100@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2023.3.39857

EDN:

FMLROA

Received:

27-02-2023


Published:

21-03-2023


Abstract: The author discusses methodological aspects of digitalization of the education system in Russia. The author's research team focuses on the philosophical-anthropological and socio-pedagogical dimensions of the studied phenomenon of the XXI century. It is shown that in the field of education, the first steps towards digital literacy of all participants in educational relations were made back in the late 1990s. During this period, this process was called "informatization" of the educational environment of educational institutions. The transition to the introduction of a wide range of information and computer technologies into the pedagogical process took place during the implementation of the first national project "Education" (2005-2010). In the 2010s, big data analytics, the all-encompassing use of artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, testing the possibilities of virtual and augmented reality, the use of 3-D printing in teaching – these and other new technologies allowed us to move to a new stage in the development of the Russian education sector. The formation of the educational environment in the context of digital transformation encourages understanding of the prospects and significant risks that the digitization process brings to the consumer society. The use of philosophical and anthropological analysis allowed the authors to identify the following risks: the risk of the formation of an individual with a "one-dimensional consciousness" in the educational environment, the tendency of the destruction of the ideological matrix of personality under the influence of digitisation, the risk of destructive transformation of the role of the teacher with the subsequent replacement of the latter with "gadgets" and software shells with "artificial intelligence", the risk of dictate from the "technocrats-developers" of educational content, the risk of worsening the health of students due to the adverse effects of digital technologies.


Keywords:

philosophy of education, education system, digitization, informatization, philosophical and anthropological approach, humanistic pedagogy, educational environment, digital learning, educational technologies, professional communities

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

IntroductionModern society is going through an important stage of the global change of the scientific and technological way of life.

Fundamental changes have affected most countries of anthropogenic civilization, affected all aspects of human existence: the socio-economic sphere, the political macrocosm, socio-cultural processes, and led to the emergence of a new paradigm of the education system. Note that such dialectical development has an objectively total and irrevocable character: it is impossible to stop the process of changing the educational paradigm. On the other hand, professional communities have all the tools to influence changing scenarios of civilizational development, consistently eliminating emerging contradictions. It is well known that many major social philosophers and futurologists, economists and political scientists have been engaged in designing and creating a theoretical model of the transition to the digital economy. Among them are E. Toffler [1], F. Fukuyama [2], J. Galbraith [3], K. Schwab [4] and others. At the time when E. Toffler in his monograph "The Shock of the Future" described the poorly verbalized contours of the future digital economy, many of the theses formulated by him seemed fantastic. In the XXI century, the rapid rhythms of the digitalization process allowed a different attitude to the forecasts of an outstanding researcher. Today, the education system plays a decisive role in the transition of consumer society to a new technological order, the creation of a global network infrastructure and a highly efficient digital economy. It seems logical to characterize the positive and negative features of the digitalization process, which somehow determine the behavior of participants in educational relations.   The main part             

 

At the level of the universal civilizational development of the economy and social sphere, the following trends of the new technological order 4.0 can be identified and characterized.

1. Big data analytics. It is necessary to state a fundamental change in the information segment of human civilization, which makes it possible to consolidate huge amounts of information, store and transmit them at high speed from one counterparty to another, generalize and systematize, create information classification bases and dynamic series. Modern supercomputers are capable of processing huge amounts of data in a very short time. "If in 2018 the entire volume of digital information stored by mankind was equal to a little more than 20 zettabytes, then by 2025 it will grow more than 8 times and reach the figure of 160 zettabytes," V.A. Maltsev noted in 2019 [5, p. 32]. The use of big data analytics has already changed the daily lives of representatives of professional communities. Connecting to a digital network of physical objects creates a new comfortable environment, one of the key elements of which is the person who controls this world. The transformation of the educational space on this basis opens up broad prospects for the field of education. A person, changing his environment of existence, transforms with it. The level of his information and communication competencies is significantly increased. A study room or laboratory with the help of the Internet of Things is already being transformed into a productive multifunctional node. "Smart home" can not only satisfy household needs, but also contribute to solving educational problems. Both an adult student of the additional professional education program and a minor college student, armed with gadgets and other technical innovations, have the opportunity to immerse themselves in the amazing world of knowledge. With one touch of the hand, the student gets access to the services of national libraries (RSL, RNB, etc.), scientific and educational centers, virtual museums of industrial enterprises. The processes of obtaining, converting and exchanging information are significantly accelerated. At the same time, of course, the methodological aspect is also important. We should not forget that any functional component should be competently integrated into the educational process.

2. Development of artificial intelligence (AI). According to one of the ideologists of the global digital paradigm, K. Schwab, artificial intelligence is able to radically reformat modern socio-economic and political processes, and in the future, in many respects, replace man, surpass him in the ability to think, analyze the surrounding reality, put forward scientific hypotheses. The economic benefits of this paradigm process, as the scientist notes, are obvious: "By processing data sets that are too large for human analysis, applications created on the basis of artificial intelligence solve problems such as climate modeling, calculation of possible nuclear threat scenarios and management of large-scale sensor networks. They are also able to collect new financially significant information by analyzing large amounts of available data" [4, p. 145].

The use of artificial intelligence opens up great opportunities for actors in the field of education. In the dialog form, its application has already taken place. The voice of the electronic assistant is heard almost everywhere. Most often, due to the lack of time for an operational analysis of informative sources, the student turns to him with a question from the field of interest and, as a rule, receives an "exhaustive" answer. The described phenomenon acquires the features of a kind of guide to the world of knowledge. It is important to understand the risks of following this style of self-determination of the learning strategy.

3. Virtual (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). Virtual reality today allows you to simulate any objects, product life cycles. The creation of simulacra, that is, virtual copies without the original, is the most important topic of reflection of representatives of the philosophy of postmodernism (Zh. Baudrillard). Augmented and mixed reality is a means by which the objectively existing world is supplemented, but not leveled and disappears completely, as in the case of virtual reality. K. Schwab, in particular, rightly notes that "<...> these technologies are platforms and systems in which it is possible to ensure the creation, exchange and spreading values. Offering a completely new channel of perception of the world and interaction with it, they become one of the most powerful world-transforming technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. However, due to the effect of presence, they, more than other digital channels, will blur the line between artificial technologies, the outside world and the role of human intuition and subjectivity. By changing the mechanism of our interaction with the Internet and digital environments, BP and OTHERS raise the most important questions about the attitude of modern man" [4, p. 205].

Virtual reality can radically change the system of general and vocational education. Even at the end of the XX century, Russians were not familiar with virtual reality. In the 1990s, professional lyceums and technical schools discussed the value meanings of the process, which was then called "informatization" of the educational environment. Yesterday's schoolchildren enthusiastically played computer games, the problem of gaming computer addiction in adolescents and young men was identified. Currently, many teachers strive to make the educational process interesting and exciting, actively using gamification methods in the educational process [6]. Virtual reality in this case can serve educational purposes. Wearing virtual glasses, you can transfer from the classroom to a modern scientific laboratory, and using simulators, climb into an airplane and deal with its units. At the same time, the process of education becomes more exciting, painted in the colors of gaming activity. The computer environment familiar to students, in which they feel familiar and comfortable, also becomes an educational environment.

4. Application of promising biotechnologies. An anthropological segment of changes within the digital economy that will directly affect a significant number of the inhabitants of our planet. According to the plans of the ideologists of the new digital revolution, biotechnologies will significantly increase life expectancy, improve its quality, strengthen the individual in relation to the negative effects of the external environment, as well as get an unprecedented opportunity to combine elements of artificial intelligence with living matter. In the future, it will be possible to "grow" a person with the appropriate genetic qualities. This procedure has become possible thanks to fundamental research in the field of genetic engineering of DNA and RNA. Biotechnologies will be able to solve the problems of hunger, since it is well known that about one billion modern people on our planet do not have enough food for their physiological life support. "In order to feed humanity in the next fifty years, it will take the same amount of food resources as were produced in the previous ten thousand years," K. notes. Schwab [4 p. 182].

At the same time, even in ancient times, philosophers thought about the nature of man, his development and self-improvement, looked for factors and circumstances that contribute to his spiritual growth, thought about the imperfection of human nature, tried to correct it. They reflected on the influence of religion and the state on society, hoped for the strength of moral foundations, deduced the concept of a categorical imperative. But the man continued to remain a mystery both to himself and to others. Scientific and technological progress in the XX century has put large-scale issues on the agenda. DNA chain discovery, genetic engineering, X and Y chromosome… These discoveries break the usual stereotypes and open up new horizons for researchers of this phenomenon. What is the nature of genius, how to make a person successful, how to overcome obstacles in life, how to achieve outstanding results in studies and work? Bio- and neurotechnologies are already ready to give us an answer to many of these questions. From bold scientific experiments in the framework of genetic engineering to taking into account psychological characteristics and creating a favorable environment that increases the individual's performance.

5. Three-dimensional printing. This is an important part of modern applied technologies within the framework of the implementation of the digital economy concept. This innovation is capable of radically transforming the modern world of professions. With the help of 3D printers, you can create innovative products of any complexity, as well as apply similar technologies in medicine. The use of a 3-D printer and a 3-D scanner, in general, is of key importance for the education system. If earlier students had to peer into the subject being studied either in the illustrations in the textbook or on the computer screen, then with the invention of the 3-D printer and scanner, it became possible to materialize the images encountered in the educational process.

The educational process has acquired a practice-oriented orientation. On the scale necessary for educational purposes, it is recommended to create funds of various didactic materials, including various kinds of visual aids from the simplest layouts to the most complex mechanisms. In history classes, soldiers of the Napoleonic army "come to life", a model of a modern aircraft turns out to be in the hands of students of the aviation college [7].  New prospects are opening up for students' research activities. The image created on the computer screen acquires a new tangible three-dimensional form in a matter of minutes. The educational process, modern technologies and the creative potential of students merge into a single whole, forming a new educational paradigm. 

Next, we will consider the impact of the digitalization process in the aspect of the ontological transformation of the personality itself.

How can the new paradigm of digital education change a person? What new existential challenges await him? What dangers lie in wait for a person in the process of digital transformation into a post-homo?   

Firstly, a certain alarming trend in the global process of digitalization of education is the risk of destruction of the ideological matrix of personality, the transformation of a person into a kind of programmable biorobot. From the means providing a more effective learning process, digital technologies can theoretically turn into the main and self-sufficient goal of such fundamental changes [8]. These technologies are capable of displacing the person himself to the periphery of the pedagogical process, turning him into a "cybernetic personality" that has entered into symbiosis with his personal computer. This is the most important "challenge" of modern pedagogy. The problem of preserving humanity in man himself is of paramount importance in the XXI century. Recall that E. Fromm also expressed concerns about this point: "The monocerebral personality is so strongly embedded in the automated system that the mechanisms created by human hands also become objects of his narcissism. He loves cars as much as he loves himself. Practically, some kind of symbiotic relationship develops between them" [9, p. 303]. The problem of the impact of digital technologies on the inner world of a person was the most important topic of E. Fromm's socio-philosophical reflections. The thinker warned that the total technologization and digitalization of the existence of the individual can lead to very deplorable consequences: the transformation of a person into a kind of machine with destructive personalistic traits: "It is hardly necessary to specify particularly that the listed features very much correspond to the character of the "cybernetic personality. Especially in such moments as the non-discrimination of living and inanimate matter, the lack of attachment (love) to other people, the use of language not for communication, but manipulation, and also the predominant interest not in people, but in machines and mechanisms" [9, p. 304].

Indeed, all participants in educational relations need to learn how to build a paradigm of communication with others in the real, not virtual process of interaction. Real interpersonal interaction is not only the most important component of the socialization of the individual, building a harmonious pedagogical process, but also a fundamental factor in the preservation of human mental health.

Secondly, a very disturbing trend in the process of total informatization is the problem of reducing and transforming the role of the teacher in the education system, as the importance of "self-learning with the help of digital technologies" increases [10, p. 63]. There are, and not always, well-founded fears among representatives of educational communities that gradually NTR is able to completely displace teachers from the learning process.  In the future, personality will be formed not by living people, but by "intelligent robots" and state-certified simulation programs. Note that this process may be due to economic factors. The introduction of digital technologies in the educational process makes it possible to significantly save the budget of an educational organization (school, college, university), allowing without relative harm to the final results, significantly reduce the wage fund. Universities, colleges and schools of the future will obviously occupy areas the size of one-room apartments, where powerful servers will be located, and the entire educational process will move to the virtual simulation sphere. The wage fund, which is released as a result of such a digital transformation, can be used to improve the software of the innovative learning process, as well as to improve other material and technical components of the educational organization. But a certain anxiety is generated by the following moment: will the state be able to employ a significant part of the intelligentsia who have lost their jobs?

In this regard, the social role of the state is extremely increasing, which will have to employ a significant number of pedagogical and scientific-pedagogical workers. However, it should be borne in mind that for many teachers and training masters, "washing out" of the profession can be a severe psychoemotional blow to their personal identity and self-esteem. At the same time, a significant number of researchers of the impact of digitalization on the education system notes that it is not possible to completely exclude a teacher from the learning process. The issue of the quality of education is directly related to the participation of living people in the process of dialogical interaction between the teacher and the student [11]. As practice shows, training that excludes a teacher from this process contains significant drawbacks: "Characteristic in this regard is the recognition of an international group of futurologists that learning "from person to person", apparently, will continue to be a key factor in development, the most effective form of training and in the case of a guided and in the case of "self-directed learning". Thus, if conditions are not created for special (pedagogical) training of students for the effective use of the resources of the educational environment, there is a risk of turning online learning into "surrogate learning" or "second-class learning" [10, p. 64].

Thirdly, one of the negative trends of digitalization of the educational process is the risk of the dictate of developers of digital systems. In this aspect, the problem may lie in the absence of a dialectical relationship between the collective educational community and representatives of the "digital establishment", developers of "educational content", software of this type.  With all due respect to the representatives of the IT professions, they are not specialists in the field of pedagogy, that is, with active practitioners immersed in a complex and creative pedagogical process. It seems to us that a long-term testing of such digital programs introduced in the learning process is needed, because only in close cooperation between current teachers and the IT community is the appearance of high-quality software possible. According to a number of authors studying this problem, it is necessary to create a new specialty of a methodologist-architect of digital learning tools, whose activities will be aimed at "identifying actual deficiencies in the practice of the educational process and the formation of technical specifications in a language understandable to developers" [8, p. 57].

Fourth, an equally important problem of the global digitalization of the education process is the risk of cybercrime. The modern digital pedagogical environment is a huge virtual archive in which the personal data of each student is stored. This information should be of an exclusively closed nature, which is associated with such confidential segments of personal data as the state of health, the psychological state of the student, his ideological and axiological attitudes, the presence or absence of socially significant contacts, the specifics of thinking and other purely individual features of a unique personality.

In this regard, the risks associated with the potential possibility of leakage of this data are predictable, and the most important is the risk of "theft" of personal data by cybercriminals outside the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation [12]. Digital information warfare can be carried out in different segments of modern civilization. For this reason, developers of digital educational content should pay considerable attention to cybersecurity issues. In addition, we emphasize that the process of digitalization generates the need to transform the legal sphere of modern society, taking into account the impact of the fourth technological revolution on this segment of society in the aspect of cybersecurity [13].

Finally, a rather disturbing moment associated with the digitalization of the learning process is the risks of deterioration of students' health due to the excessively intensive use of e-education technologies [14]. According to experts, the problems of the negative impact of digital technologies on the physical and mental health of students, the total computerization of the educational process has changed the anthropological appearance of the individual as a biosocial being [15]. For example, Doctor of Medical Sciences A.S. Tikhon notes that the intensive use of computers and tablets in education significantly worsens the health of adolescents, such as: "Prolonged work at the computer leads to impaired vision, physical inactivity, social isolation. The harmful effect of electronic devices on the student is manifested in electromagnetic irradiation of the body. Large doses of harmful physical effects that can accumulate over several years can eventually cause serious consequences. But most of all, prolonged use of the computer harms the child and adolescent psyche" [16, p. 37].

Researchers, among others, especially highlight the following group of negative factors affecting the mental health of students:

a) The formation of computer addiction, when the student does not imagine his life outside of the coveted opportunity to stay in "virtual reality". It is a mistake to think that addictive addiction is formed only by games and entertainment content.

b) Distortion of the perception of objective reality, negative tendencies of the emotional background of a young person.

c) Difficulties in relationships with other personalities, the natural mechanisms of human socialization were violated. An individual who has gone headlong into virtual or augmented reality loses the natural mechanisms of building normal social relationships with another person. Moreover, such "informational alienation" in the future can produce reactive psychoses.

Due to the geopolitical conflict between Russia and the "collective West", it is quite appropriate to raise the question of an "innovative return" to some elements of the educational system developed in the USSR, which proved its unique effectiveness within the dialectic of the "mobilization project". The Russian Federation faces the most important task of accelerated import substitution and import substitution, the ability of the education system to effectively solve such complex and multilevel tasks [17].  

Let us express the opinion that the process of digitalization should be the most important element in the formation of a person with a university type of culture and worldview, which makes it possible to receive all the knowledge available to a person today. It seems necessary to form such educational standards that would contribute to the perception of a holistic picture of the world, overcoming social barriers and alienation, would give each student the widest opportunities for the fullest realization of an individual "life project". In our opinion, this means a certain "distancing" from the experience of the Western education system and a return to the best examples of Soviet pedagogy, which proved its unique effectiveness to the whole world. 

The mobilization of the economic system, the ultimate reduction of technological dependence on unfriendly countries involves the use of digital technologies in order to form a highly intelligent personality with developed critical thinking, which will be able to effectively and adequately respond to all the challenges of the post-industrial era.

 Conclusion.The application of philosophical-anthropological and socio-pedagogical approaches allowed us to draw the following conclusions.

In the Russian education system, the first steps towards digital literacy of all participants in educational relations were made back in the late 1990s. During this period, this process was called "informatization" of the educational environment of educational institutions. The transition to the introduction of a wide range of information and computer technologies into the pedagogical process took place during the implementation of the first national project "Education" (2005-2010). In the 2010s, big data analytics, the all-encompassing use of artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, testing the possibilities of virtual and augmented reality, the use of 3-D printing in teaching – these and other latest technologies allowed us to move to a new stage in the development of Russian education. In the 2020s, the pace of development of the educational environment in the context of digital transformation encourages further reflection on the prospects and significant risks that the digitalization process brings to the consumer society.

References
1. Toffler E. (2004). Shock of the future. Moscow: AST, 557 p.
2. Fukuyama F. (2004). The end of history and the last man. Moscow: AST, 588 p.
3. Galbraith J. (2004). New Industrial Society. Moscow: AST, 602 p.
4. Schwab K. (2018). Technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: Eksmo, 320 p.
5. Maltsev V.A. (2019). Karl Marx and big data. Moscow: Rodina, 342 p.
6. Gusev I.E. (2020). Gamification as a tool for improving the professional activity of a teacher in a digital society (review of publications). Problems of modern pedagogical education, 68(1), 86-91.
7. Samaeva O.S., Astashkin S.O. (2020). Additive digital technologies for the formation of meta-subject learning outcomes.Informatics at school, 4, 49-58.
8. Panchenko O.L. (2021). Risks of personality adaptation in the conditions of digitalization of education. Man and education, 1(66), 113-118.
9. Fromm E. (1994). Anatomy of human destructiveness. M.: Republic, 447 p.
10. Didactic concept of digital vocational education and training (2019). Authors: P.N. Bilenko, V.I. Blinov, M.V. Dulinov, IM. Yesenina, A.M. Kondakov, I.S. Sergeev; under the scientific editorship of V.I. Blinov. M.: Publishing House "Pero", 98 p.
11. Musalov M.A. (2021). Problems and prospects of distance education and IT technologies in higher education in extreme conditions // Bulletin of Pedagogical Sciences, 1, 155-159.
12. Voronov A.M., Gogolev A.M., Zemskova T.S. (2019). Legal administration on the threshold of the fourth Industrial Revolution. The Russian legal system in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Materials of the VI Moscow Legal Forum of the XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference. Part 1, 109-115.
13. Voronov A.M., Gogolev A.M. (2017).To the subject of administrative law of modern Russia. Bulletin of the Financial University, Vol. 21, 1(97), 125-130.
14. Tarasov A.V., Rakhmanov R.S., Bogomolova E.S., Skoblina N.A., Ievleva O.V. (2022). Modern factors determining the state of health of student youth // Russian Bulletin of Hygiene, 1, 4-9.
15. Sukhov A.N. Information security: theoretical and practical aspect (2021). Psychological and pedagogical bulletin, 1 (57), 183-191.
16. Tikhon A.S. (2020). The negative impact of the computer and the Internet on the psyche and health of children. Web of Scholar, 1(43), 36-39.
17. Sorina G.V., Gurov F.N. (2022). Humanitarian import substitution: what is worth excluding Russia from the Bologna process? Siberian Philosophical Journal, Vol. 20, 2, 57-67.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study was the field of vocational education in the context of the digital transformation of modern society. Within the framework of this study, the main attention is paid to the problems of the impact of the digitalization process on the field of vocational education. The research methodology is based on philosophical, anthropological and socio-pedagogical approaches to the analysis of the impact of the digitalization process on the field of vocational education. An analytical review of publications on the trends of digitalization of modern society is used as a research method. The relevance of the topic of the publication is determined by the fact that the main modern trend in the development of vocational education, which determines the main strategy and methodology of the activities of its institutions, is currently becoming the processes of digitalization. The widespread and intensive introduction of digital technologies into the daily life of a person radically transforms the essence and organization of the professional education system, its educational, methodological and technological support. These challenges require philosophical reflection, which is undertaken within the framework of this article. The scientific novelty of the publication is associated with the justification of the transition to a new stage in the development of Russian education under the influence of such digitalization trends as the development of big data analytics, the all-encompassing use of artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, testing the possibilities of virtual and augmented reality, the use of 3-D printing in education. The paper also analyzes the dangers and risks that lie in wait for a person in the process of digital transformation. Among them are highlighted: the risk of destruction of the ideological matrix of personality, the transformation of a person into a kind of programmable biorobot; the danger of reducing and transforming the role of a teacher in the professional education system with the increasing importance of self-learning using digital technologies, the risk of dictate from developers of digital systems, the risk of cybercrime. Note that, of course, these risks exist. But the text does not answer the question: why are they highlighted? Why are the risks of information segmentation not highlighted? Moreover, the disclosure of precisely the methodological aspects of the digitalization of vocational education in the XXI century did not occur in the work. This study is characterized by a certain logical sequence. The language of the publication is scientific, quite often the author makes excursions that lead away from the main presentation (for example, when analyzing the risk of destruction of the ideological matrix of a personality, there is a transition to conclusions about the need for "all participants in educational relations to learn how to build a paradigm of communication with others in the real, not virtual process of interaction. Real interpersonal interaction is not only an essential component of personal socialization, building a harmonious pedagogical process, but also a fundamental factor in maintaining human mental health"). In some cases, there is a lack of consistency between the subtitle and the content of the paragraph (for example, paragraph 2. The development of artificial intelligence and robotics there is no mention of the development of robotics, and in 4. The use of neurotechnologies, in addition to these technologies, we are talking more about biotechnologies) The bibliography of the work includes 12 works, among which only a couple of works by modern authors addressing the problem of modern digital reality, making an attempt to comprehend it, and a couple of works on the transformation of vocational education. Therefore, it is impossible to recognize an appeal to the main opponent as sufficient. Thus, the conclusions are present and have a certain justification. The work will be of interest to specialists in the field of social philosophy and philosophy of education. The article "Methodological aspects of the digitalization process of vocational education in the XXI century" has scientific significance. The work can be published after 1) disclosing precisely the methodological aspects of the digitalization of vocational education in the XXI century (or changing the name of the work), 2) eliminating the contradiction between the name of the sub-items and their content, 3) expanding the list of works through publications on the transformation of vocational education in the context of digitalization.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author's understanding of the reviewed article "education" is frankly perplexing: as can be concluded on the basis of acquaintance with her, he sees in this term anything but the assimilation of scientific and cultural achievements, in the process of which personality formation takes place – and this is exactly the meaning of the concept of education carried when it was introduced into wide circulation by "neo-humanists", and later, when in history It was saturated with moral content in the national culture, which does not allow today to reduce "education" to the notorious "competencies". In general, it seems that the author was late in presenting his article to the reader: the many cliches reproduced in it, characterizing the "optimism" of international financiers observing the processes of "globalization" and seeking to extend them to the education system in anticipation of the appearance of a "qualified consumer", today no longer arouse either trust or sympathy. The same could be repeated about the dubious authorities mentioned or quoted in the article. Already at the very beginning we read: "Today, the education system plays a crucial role in the transition of consumer society to a new technological order, the creation of a global network infrastructure and a highly efficient digital economy." It seems that the author does not even have any concern about the fact that the "education system" is being put at the service of a "consumer society" that has reached the limit of its existence and is trying to prolong it with the help of a "new technological way of life". Is it necessary to repeat that this "way of life", as it is already quite clear today, does not serve "man", but the preservation of the "level of consumption" as a condition for maintaining the dominant position of the financial oligarchy in the socio-economic sphere of today's world? Maybe this is just a separate unfortunate formulation? Unfortunately, no, and the main content of the text also demonstrates an exclusively "official" understanding of the role of education in the modern and, most importantly, the future world. For example, what does the author say about the meaning of "big data" (when, finally, will an equivalent of this expression be found that does not so barbarously disfigure the Russian language?!): "The transformation of the educational space on this basis opens up wide prospects for the education sector. A person, changing his environment of existence, transforms with it. (This is unfortunately true, but for how long will we be able to call the result of this "transformation" a human being? – reviewer). The level of his information and communication skills is significantly increased. ... Both an adult student of the additional professional education program and a minor college student, armed with gadgets and other technical innovations, have the opportunity to immerse themselves in the amazing world of knowledge." Does the author really not know what the world is like, into which, as a rule, a "minor student" is "immersed", deprived of communication with a teacher, who in today's extremely bureaucratic "digital economy" has no time for anything other than daily "reporting"? The whole country knows, but the author of the "scientific article" does not know? It is impossible to ignore the passages about "virtual" and "augmented" reality, for example: "The creation of simulacra, that is, virtual copies without the original, is the most important topic of thought for representatives of postmodern philosophy... Schwab, in particular, is fair (of course, is such an "authoritative" character capable of allowing injustice? – the reviewer) notes that "<...> these technologies represent platforms and systems in which it is possible to ensure the creation, exchange and dissemination of values (! – reviewer). ... By changing the mechanism of our interaction with the Internet and digital environments, BP and OTHERS raise the most important questions about the worldview of modern man." And also "biotechnology", "three-dimensional printing", etc. No, the author sees, of course, "risks": "the risk of destruction of the ideological matrix of personality, the transformation of a person into a kind of programmable biorobot. Of the means to ensure a more effective learning process, digital technologies theoretically (yes, no, quite "practically"! – reviewer) can become the main and self-sufficient goal of such fundamental changes. These technologies are capable of displacing the person himself to the periphery of the pedagogical process, turning him into a "cybernetic personality" who entered into symbiosis with his personal computer." However, all this seems to the author to be an objective process, once attached to which, domestic education should no longer even think about liberation… But isn't "education" the activity of a free person and a free society? And again, where is "education" in all this? It is no coincidence that the "Conclusion" turned out to be so empty – something needs to be said about education, but how can I say if the entire content of the text turned out to be an apology for "gadgets", globalization, "competence", etc.? I am convinced that the presented text fundamentally inadequately reflects the influence of "digitalization" on today's domestic education, I recommend it reject it.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study of the article "Methodological aspects of the digitalization of the education system in the XXI century", submitted to the journal "Philosophical Thought", is, as its name implies, the process of digitalization of the education system as a whole in the world and in Russia. The research methodology is presented by a comparative analysis of various trends in digitalization in terms of their application to the educational process. A critical analysis allows us to identify the prospects of those trends that are felt in the present and identify the "problem areas" of the described global trend. The relevance of understanding the processes taking place in education in general and higher education in particular has been overdue for a long time. It is this need that initiates numerous forums, meetings, publications of thematic collections and articles on new forms of teaching, the use of opportunities that have opened up for the educational process in connection with digitalization and computerization of education. The pandemic of 2019-2021 and the forced temporary transition of school and university education to a distance format have only actualized many previously discussed issues, many of which are philosophical in nature. The author of the article tries to give a systematic characterization of the positive and negative features of the digitalization process, which somehow determine the behavior of participants in educational relations. Many modern researchers recognize that the position of the information flow of timeliness is radically different from past centuries. Even in the early and mid-20th century, the availability of information was much lower than it is now. Today, a civilized person does not face the task of "obtaining" information. Most information can be easily "obtained" from open sources. Does this mean that the teacher, the teacher becomes unnecessary, the living contact between the teacher and the student becomes unnecessary? The author gives an unequivocally negative answer to this question. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the systematization and generalization of both positive and negative trends in the digitalization of the education system in the 21st century. The style of the article is quite consistent with the article on philosophy, combining a fairly high level of theory with clarity and logic of presentation. The structure and content of the article fully reveal the topic stated in the title. The article has a clear formal division with divisions into introduction, main part and conclusion. The main part, in turn, is divided into two, almost equal, halves. The first is devoted to the identification and characterization of the main trends of the new technological order 4.0. The second is the impact of the digitalization process on the human personality and the dangers that may be associated with it. The bibliography is represented by 17 titles, including both the general philosophical works of Toffler, Fukuyama, Galbraith, Schwab, and studies of the digitalization process - Gusev I.E., Samaeva O.S., Astashkin S.O., Panchenko O.L., Sukhov A.N., as well as articles of the last year on problems related to the digitalization of education in Russia, such as authors such as Tikhon A.S., Sorina G.V., Gurov F.N. Appeal to opponents is present in the form of solidarity with earlier studies of the problem of digitalization, its positive and negative aspects. The conclusions and interest of the readership will be provided to the article by a wide audience, which will include both philosophers dealing with the problems of modern anthropology and virtual reality, sociology, as well as higher school teachers, psychologists, all interested in current social trends.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.