Статья 'Единство процесса создания живописного произведения. Идеальное и материальное.' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Unity of the process of creating a fine art painting: ideal and material

Demenev Denis Nikolaevich

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Architecture and Fine Arts, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

455000, Russia, Chelyabinskaya oblast', g. Magnitogorsk, ul. Lenina, 38, of. korpus

denis-demenev@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2021.3.32491

Review date:

29-03-2020


Publish date:

22-03-2021


Abstract: The subject of this research is the interaction of the ideal and the material, which ensures unity of the process of creating a fine art painting. The object of this research is the dynamics of this process, which gradually materializes the ideal through poetic transformation of the objective reality. In the course of creating a fine art painting, the author underlines the importance of ontological-phenomenological and socio-gnoseological aspects of human existence, which in many ways determine the technical and technological means of solution of the artistic and creative tasks. Special attention is given to contemplation of the objective world, purposive action of the artistic will, establishment of the artistic image as interrelated stages of objectification of the ideal. The novelty of this article consists in interpretation of the phenomenon of the ideal, reflected in painting via integrated will. The latter is the synthesis of artistic will and subjective will of the painter. The author describes a “shuttle principle” in objectification of the ideal in the works of art within the framework of the history of development of painting, as well as within a single process: 1) from the aesthetic form to the embodiment of universality of the content; 2) from the universal content to aesthetic embodiment. The following conclusions were made: 1) the objectively ideal in a painting is an aesthetically perceived (visually, mentally, and spiritually) boundary of beauty and beautiful depicted via perfect, absolute unity of the artistic form and content, artistically and graphically, adequate to its concept in its material outcome, in reality. It is of rare occurrence in the works of art, something to be sought for; 2) an artistic form should be correlated in the artwork with universality of its content, which results in the fusion of the ideal and the real, and forms their indifference; 3) the universal meanings, ideologically underlying the content of a fine art painting, deepen and broaden the possibilities of artistic matter for objectification of the ideal in aesthetic form.


Keywords: artistic image, shuttle principle, poetization of reality, universality of content, pictorial work, art form, integrated will, material, ideal, process
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Prokhorov M. M. Protsessual'nost' bytiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2016. № 3. S. 320-336.
2.
Ernst Ul'man. Uchenie o proportsiyakh / Per. s nem., T.A. Sedelkinoi // Plasticheskaya anatomiya: [Sb.]. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST»: OOO «Izdatel'stvo Astrel'». 2003. S. 277-315.
3.
Losev, A. F. Istoriya esteticheskikh kategorii / A. F. Losev, V. P. Shestakov. M. : «Iskusstvo». 1964. – 376 s.
4.
Medvedeva A. A. Klassitsizm kak reversivnyi etap v razvitii iskusstva i khudozhestvennoi kul'tury /A.A. Medvedeva, Yu.V. Mordvinova, D.N. Demenev // Khudozhestvennoe obrazovanie: istoriya i sovremennost'. 2019. S. 201-204.
5.
Sulzer, J. G. Allgmeine Theorie der schonen Kunste, Bd. II / J. G. Sulzer.Leipzig, 1794. S. 371.
6.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / I. Kant. M. 1999. 1472 s.
7.
Shelling F.V. Filosofiya iskusstva / perev. P.S. Popova. M.: Mysl'. 1966.
8.
Marks, K., Engel's F. Soch., t. 26, ch. I.
9.
Il'enkov E. V. Dialekticheskaya logika. M. 1974.
10.
Lifshits M. A. Ob ideal'nom i real'nom // «Voprosy filosofii». 1984. № 10.
11.
Vul'f Kristof. Antropologiya: Istoriya, kul'tura, filosofiya / Per. s nem. G. Khaidarovoi. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. Un-ta. 2008. 280 s.
12.
Bychkov V. V. O dukhovnosti v iskusstve // Voprosy filosofii. 2018. № 5. S. 76-87.
13.
Zhukovskii V. I. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epitsentre khudozhestvennoi kul'tury / Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. 11(71). S. 1613-1620. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.9845.
14.
Gete I.-V. Ob iskusstve. M., Iskusstvo. 1975. S. 156.
15.
Sapego I. G. Predmet i forma. Rol' vospriyatiya material'noi sredy khudozhnikom v sozdanii plasticheskoi formy. M.: Sovetskii khudozhnik, 1984. 304 s.
16.
Pomerants G. S. Paradoksy dzen // Nauka i religiya. 1989. № 5.
17.
Demenev D. N. Khudozhestvennaya volya kak ontologicheskoe osnovanie iskusstva // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2020. № 3. S. 10-24. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2020.3.32338.
18.
Matakov K. A. Ontologiya ideal'nogo: dissertatsiya ... kandidata filosofskikh nauk : 09.00.01. Moskva. 2001. 162 s.
19.
Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 46. Ch. I.
20.
Tukaeva R. A. Izobrazitel'naya real'nost' kak predmet filosofskogo osmysleniya: dissertatsiya ... kandidata filosofskikh nauk : 09.00.01. Ufa. 2015. 185 s.
21.
Zhukovskii, V. I. Zrimaya sushchnost' – vizual'noe myshlenie v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve / V. I. Zhukovskii. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovskoe izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta. 1991. 284 s.
22.
Demenev D. N. Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneishie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 10. S. 21-29.
23.
Borovinskaya D. N., Surovtsev V. A. Refleksiya i priroda kreativnosti // Vestn. Tom.gos. un-ta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2019. № 49. C. 17–25. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Kh/49/2.
24.
Lenin V. I. Poln. Sobr. Soch. T.18.
25.
Kandinskii V. V. Gershenzonovskaya glava iz sochineniya «Suprematizm. Mir kak bespredmetnost', ili vechnyi pokoi». [Elektronnyi resurs] // Rezhim dostupa: http://kazimirmalevich.ru/bsp2210 Data obrashcheniya: 14.11.2020 g.
26.
Kandinskii V. V. Kandinskii «O dukhovnom iskusstve». [Elektronnyi resurs] // Rezhim dostupa: http: // www.gramotey.com/?open_file=401213957253.23 Data obrashcheniya: 14.11.2020 g.
27.
Kandinskii V. V. Tsvet i dukhovnost' v zhivopisi. [Elektronnyi resurs] // Rezhim dostupa: http://www.5arts.info/kandinsky-the-color-and-spirituality/#.UP2s2WFESho: Data obrashcheniya: 14.11.2020 g.
28.
Vzdoronov G. I. Zolotoi vek russkoi zhivopisi. Ot Andreya Rubleva do Dionisiya / Nashe Nasledie. № 96. 2010. S. 9-19.
29.
Volkov, N. N. Tsvet v zhivopisi / N. N. Volkov. M. : Iskusstvo, 1984. 320 s.
30.
Raushenbakh B. V. Geometriya kartiny i zritel'noe vospriyatie / B.V. Raushenbakh. SPb.: Azbuka-klassika. 2002. 320 s.
31.
Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika. V 4 t. / perevod B.G. Stolpnera. M.: Iskusstvo, 1968. T. 1.
32.
Losev A. F. Samoe samo. Mif, chislo, sushchnost' / A. F. Losev. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 300-526.
33.
Demenev D. N. Ratsional'nyi element v strukture khudozhestvennogo protsessa / Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. № 5. S. 166-175.
34.
Vlasov V. G. Novyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar' izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: V 10 t. T. V: L–M. SPb.: Azbuka-klassika. 2006. 768 s.
35.
Demenev D. N. Iskusstvo bez obraza kak ontologicheskaya problema // Formirovanie predmetno-prostranstvennoi sredy. 2019. S. 108-113.
36.
Zedl'mair Kh. Iskusstvo i istina / Kh. Zedl'mair // O teorii i metode istorii iskusstva. M.: Iskusstvoznanie. 1999. 367 s.
37.
Adorno T. Esteticheskaya teoriya. M.: Respublika. 2001.
38.
Danilova E. I. Al'ternativa chelovecheskogo bytiya: Tvorcheskaya deyatel'nost' ili deyatel'nost' bez tvorchestva // Vestnik MaGU: Periodicheskii nauchnyi zhurnal. Vyp. 2-3. Magnitogorsk: MaGU. 2001-2002. S. 141-145.
39.
«Sovremennaya kniga po estetike». M., 1957.
40.
E.Bloch. Subjekt – Objekt. Berlin. 1951.
41.
Serikova T. Yu. Sub''ektivnaya avtorskaya real'nost' i ee rol' v formirovanii ontologicheskikh osnovanii khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2020. № 2. S. 104-113.
42.
Lazarev S. N. Chelovek budushchego. Pervyi shag v budushchee. SPb. 2016. 256 s.
43.
Mamonov B. Nevidimyi khudozhnik // Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal. № 64. 2007. S. 7-9.
44.
Demenev D. N. Zhizneutverzhdayushchee iskusstvo Aleksandra Deineki kak sintez khudozhestvennoi i zhiznennoi pravdy / Chelovek i kul'tura. 2018. № 1. S.46-54. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8744.2018.1.25427.
45.
Sal'nikov V. Mozhno li verit' sovremennomu russkomu iskusstvu? // Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal. № 63. 2006. S. 9-11.
46.
Mamonov B. Tsena opiuma // Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal. № 63. 2006. S. 21-25.
47.
Tolstykh V. I. Iskusstvo i moral'. (O sotsial'noi sushchnosti i funktsii iskusstva). M., Politizdat. 1973. 440 s.
48.
Demenev D. N. Capitalist paradigm of contemporary art as an ontological problem / D.N. Demenev, A.A. Gerasimova, A.A. Isaev, S.A. Gavritskov, O.V. Vandysheva// The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS. Volume 92-SCTMG 2020.P. 1606-1612.DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.05.212.
49.
Degtyarev E. V. Zarozhdenie iskusstva ekspansionizma: paradoksy i formoobrazuyushchie klishe / Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii. 2020. № 3. S. 79-86.
50.
Kachan S. A. Imperator v obraze Khora: prodolzhayushchiesya traditsii i greko-rimskie vliyaniya v poklonenii pravitelyu v rimskom Egipte / Problemy istorii, filologii, kul'tury. 2020. № 1. S. 76-98. DOI: 10.18503/1992-0431-2020-1-67-76–98.
51.
Faritov V.T. Transgressiya i transtsendentsiya kak perspektivy vremeni i bytiya v filosofii M. Khaideggera i F. Nitsshe // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2014. № 8. S.1-24. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13371.
52.
Demenev D.N. O probleme vkusa v iskusstve // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2016. № 3. S. 440 - 451. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.3.17661.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website