Статья 'Понятие субъекта в санкхье и дискуссия между буддистами и санкхьяиками в разделе «Атмапарикша» «Таттвасанграхи» Шанатаракшиты о существовании и свойствах атмана' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

The concept of subject of Samkhya and discussion between Buddhist and Samkhyaks in the passage Atmapariksha from Shantarakshita's Tattvasamgraha on the existence and qualities of Atman

Titlin Lev Igorevich

PhD in Philosophy

research fellow, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, 117198, Russia, Moskva oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12 str.1, kab. 516

titlus@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2019.9.31153

Review date:

25-10-2019


Publish date:

07-11-2019


Abstract.

This article examines the metaphysical nature of Samkhya and the concept of subject within it; then the author refers to the polemics between Buddhists and Samkhyaks as it is described in the passage Atmapariksha from Shantarakshita's Tattvasamgraha (VIII century) with the commentary "Panjika” of Shri Kamalashila. The subject of this research is the concept of subject within the philosophical system of Samkhya as it is given in Samkhya Karika and section on the polemics with Samkhya of the chapter Atmapariksha from Shantarakshita's Tattvasamgraha with the commentary "Panjika” of Shri Kamalashila. The object of this research is the Samkhya Karika and Shantarakshita's Tattvasamgraha. The key research method is the classical historical-philosophical method suggesting the combination of several methodological approaches. Genetic approach, comprehended as a method of studying philosophical concepts and notions, is based on the analysis of their origin and development. It implies consideration of the objects in evolutionary perspective, in dynamics of their historical development, therefore requires the establishment of initial conditions, key stage, main trends and strategies of development. The main goal of such research lies in identification of connection between the objects in time, studying of transitions from the historically older forms of philosophical (or even pre-philosophical) reflection towards the historically more recent. The author’s special contribution consists in conducting the first even research in Russia and in Russian language of the chapter “Discussion with the representatives of Samkhya on Atman” of the passage Atmapariksha from Shantarakshita's Tattvasamgraha with the commentary "Panjika” of Shri Kamalashila based on the original translation from Sanskrit.

Keywords: Samkhya, non-self, self, Tattvasamgraha, Kamalashila, Shantarakshita, subject, anatman, Purusha, buddhi
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Lepekhov S. Yu. Filosofiya madkh'yamikov i genezis buddiiskoi tsivilizatsii. Ulan-Ude : Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN, 1999. 237 s.
2.
Lepekhov S. Yu. Germenevtika buddizma. Ulan-Ude : Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN, 2006. S. 3-82; 225-257.
3.
Lunnyi svet sankkh'i. Sankkh'ya-karika Ishvarakrishny s kommentariyami Gaudapady i Vachaspati Mishry ("Sankkh'ya-karika-bkhash'ya" i "Tattva-kaumudi") / Issledovanie, perevod, nauchnyi kommentarii i slovar' V.K. Shokhina. M. : Ladomir, 1995. 328 s.
4.
Lysenko V.G. Pudgala Filosofiya buddizma: entsiklopediya / otv. red. M.T. Stepanyants; In-t filosofii RAN. M. : Vost. lit., 2011. S. 566-567.
5.
Lysenko V.G., Kanaeva N.A. Shantarakshita i Kamalashila ob instrumentakh dostovernogo poznaniya. M. : Institut filosofii RAN, 2014. 295 s.
6.
Sutry filosofii sankkh'i / Izdanie podgotovil V.K. Shokhin. M.: Ladomir, 1997. 366 s.
7.
Terent'ev A.A. Madkh''yamaka // Filosofiya buddizma: entsiklopediya / otv. red. M.T. Stepanyants; In-t filosofii RAN. M. : Vost. lit., 2011. S. 422-424.
8.
Titlin L.I. Diskussiya Shantarakshity i Kamalashily s sankkh'yaikami ob atmane (per. fragmenta «Atmaparikshi» iz «Tattvasangrakha-pandzhiki») / Logos et Praxis 2018. Volgograd, 2018.
9.
Titlin L.I. Polemika s n'yaya-vaisheshikoi po voprosu o sushchestvovanii sub''ekta v «Tattva-sangrakhe» Shantarakshity // Elektronnyi zhurnal Filosofskaya mysl'. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_20948.html (data obrashcheniya 10.10.2017). S. 139-163.
10.
Titlin L.I. Polemika Shantarakshity i Kamalashily s mimansakami o sushchestvovanii i svoistvakh atmana v «Tattvasangrakha-pandzhike» (perevod fragmenta). Gumanitarii: aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnoi nauki i obrazovaniya. Saransk : Izdatel'skii tsentr Istoriko-sotsiologicheskogo instituta Mordovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. P. Ogareva, 2018.
11.
Titlin L.I. Ponyatie sub''ekta v buddizme pudgalavady // Istoriya filosofii № 17. M. : Izd-vo IF RAN, 2013. S. 15-40.
12.
Filosofiya buddizma: entsiklopediya / otv. red. M.T. Stepanyants; In-t filosofii RAN. M. : Vost. lit., 2011. 1050 c.
13.
Androsov V.P. Shantarakshita // Filosofiya buddizma: entsiklopediya / otv. red. M.T. Stepanyants; In-t filosofii RAN. M. : Vost. lit., 2011. S. 799-800.
14.
Androsov V.P. Madkh''yamaka // Filosofiya buddizma: entsiklopediya / otv. red. M.T. Stepanyants; In-t filosofii RAN. M. : Vost. lit., 2011. S. 420-422.
15.
Chatterdzhi A.K. Idealizm iogachary / Per. D. Ust'yantsev. Shechen: 2004. 268 s.
16.
Shokhin V.K. Pudgalavada // Filosofiya buddizma: entsiklopediya / otv. red. M.T. Stepanyants; In-t filosofii RAN. M. : Vost. lit., 2011. S. 208-210.
17.
Shokhin V.K. Sankkh'ya // Indiiskaya filosofiya: Entsiklopediya / Otv. red. M.T. Stepanyants. M. : Vostochnaya literatura, 2009. S. 700-707.
18.
Blumenthal J. Śāntarakṣita, Rgyal-tshab Dar-ma-rin-chen. The ornament of the middle way: a study of the Madhyamaka thought of Śāntarakṣita : including translations of Śāntarakṣita's Mādhyamakālaṃkāra (The ornament of the middle way) and Gyel-tsab's dbU ma rgyan gyi brjed byang (Remembering "The ornament of the middle way"). Snow Lion Publications, 2004. 381 p.
19.
Jha G. (Tr.). The Tattvasangraha of Shantaraksita With the Commentary of Kamalashila. Vol. 1. Delhi : Motilal Banarsidass, 1986. 739 p.
20.
Ratié I. Une critique bouddhique du Soi selon la Mimamsa: Présentation, édition critique et traduction de la Mimamsakaparikalpitatmapariksa de Śantaraksita. Series: Beiträge zur Kultur-und Geistesgeschichte Asiens. Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 2014. 371 p.
21.
Śāntarakṣita. Tattvasaṃgraha, with the comment. Pañjikā of Shrī Kamalaśīla // Gaekwad`s Oriental series/ Ed. E. Kṛṣṇāmācārya. With a Foreword by B.Bhattacharyya. Baroda? 1926. In 2 vols.
22.
Tattvasaṃgraha of Ācārya Śāntarakṣita with the commentary Pañjikā of Śrī Kamalaśīla. Critisal Edited by Swāmi Dvārikāda Śāstrī. In 2 vols., Varanasi : Bauddha Bharati, 1968.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website