по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Philosophy as Research Programm: Between Epistemology and History of Science
Przhilenskiy Vladimir Igorevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor of the Philosophical Department at Kutafin Moscow State Law Academy

125993, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, 9, of. 1

vladprnow@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The given article analyses the disciplinary status of Philosophy of Science as the science from the point of it’s regarding to Epistemology. The author of the arti-cle examines the supporter’s arguments according to the including Philosophy of Science into Epistemology as an essential part. The idea of Philosophy of Science and Epistemology examining as two close sciences in methodological and disci-pline meaning, between which there should not be any essential distinctions, is criticizing in this article. The position according to which Philosophy of Science originates from the definite stage of the science development appears as the historical and critical alternative for epistemological projecting of the science development.

Keywords: philosophy of science, epistemology, history of science, critics, relfexion, constructivism, research program

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2013.3.267

Article was received:

23-10-2019


Review date:

23-10-2019


Publish date:

1-3-2013


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ankersmit F.R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory. M. , 2003. S. 270.
2.
Filosofiya nauki: problemy i perspektivy (materialy kruglogo stola) // Voprosy filosofii. 2006. № 10. S. 39.
3.
Bas C. van Fraassen. Structure: Its Shadow and Substance // The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2006. № 57(2). p. 288.
4.
Bas C. van Fraassen. Structure: Its Shadow and Substance // The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2006. № 57(2). p. 293.
5.
Vainberg S. Mechty ob okonchatel'noi teorii. M., 2004. S. 131-132.
6.
Kul'turnye universalii, nauka i vnenauchnoe znanie / Zabluzhdayushchiisya razum?: Mnogoobrazie vnenauchnogo znaniya. M., 1990. S. 353.
7.
Kasavin I.T. Chto nedostatochno znat' o znanii // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2009, t.XXI. № 3. S. 83.
8.
Gendler T.S., Hawthorne J. Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Vol 1. 2005. p.V.
9.
Khaking Ya. Predstavlenie i vmeshatel'stvo. Vvedenie v filosofiyu estestvennykh nauk. M.: Logos, 1998. S. 8.
10.
Grailing A.C. Truth, Meaning and Realism. London: 2008. p. 130.
11.
Benardete Jose A. Metaphysics: The Logical Approach. N.Y., 1989. p. 188.
12.
Ankersmit F.R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory. M., 2003. S. 216.
13.
Mokshitskii E. Mezhdu antropologiei i sotsiologiei znaniya / SOTsIO-LOGOS. Sotsiologiya. Antropologiya. Metafizika. M., 1991. S. 117.
14.
Popper K. Predpolozhenie i oproverzhenie: Rost nauchnogo znaniya. M., 2004. S. 219.
15.
Kasavin I.T. Predtechi nauchnoi revolyutsii / Filosofiya nauki. – Vyp. 5: Filosofiya nauki v poiskakh novykh putei. M., 1999. S. 31.
16.
Lektorskii V.A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M., 2001. S. 110.
17.
Rorti R. Filosofiya i zerkalo prirody. Novosibirsk, 1997.
18.
Lektorskii V.A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M., 2001. S. 108.
19.
E.A. Popov. Mezhdistsiplinarnyi opyt gumanitarnogo znaniya i sovremennoi sotsiologicheskoi nauki // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.04.8.
20.
O.L. Dubovik. Znachenie nauchnykh issledovanii v oblasti atomnoi i kvantovoi fiziki dlya politiki, kul'tury i obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.03.15.
21.
V.A. Yakovlev. Sotsiokul'turnyi status nauki v evropeiskoi istorii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.03.12.
22.
O. L. Dubovik. Rol' fundamental'nykh nauchnykh issledovanii v obshchestve // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – № 8. – S. 104-107.
23.
M. V. Shugurov. Deyatel'nost' Vsemirnogo banka v sfere global'nogo rasprostraneniya znanii i tekhnologii: pravo i praktika // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
24.
V.G. Fedotova, A.F. Yakovleva. Nauka i modernizatsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 104-107.
25.
N.A. Kasavina. Terapiya i tekhnologiya: kak rabotat' s ekzistentsiei? // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 104-107.
26.
O.E. Baksanskii. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya modernizatsii sovremennogo obrazovaniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 104-107.
27.
N.V. Danielyan. Rol' konstruktivizma v usloviyakh perekhoda ot informatsionnogo obshchestva k “obshchestvu znaniya” // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 104-107.
28.
E.A. Samarskaya. Organizovannyi sotsial'nyi mir i ego sovremennye kritiki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
29.
A. Shazhinbatyn. Uchenie V. Gumbol'dta o sravnitel'noi antropologii // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 104-107
30.
N.V. Danielyan Rol' konstruktivizma v usloviyakh perekhoda ot informatsionnogo obshchestva k “obshchestvu znaniya” // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 9. - C. 112 - 119.
31.
Yu.S. Morkina B. Latur. Popytka novogo vzglyada na lyudei i veshchi v issledovanii nauki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 6. - C. 121 - 131.
32.
P.A. Ol'khov Istoriya kak nauka: k stilisticheskim iskaniyam G.G. Shpeta // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 6. - C. 132 - 141.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website