по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
What is modernity for a modern person
Lagunova Irina Sergeevna

senior lecturer, the department of Constitutional and Municipal Law, Nizhny Novgorod of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

603950, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, prospekt Gagarina, 46

i.s.lagunova@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

Man has always been interested in his future, looking for his roots in present day, modernity - the only time in which he could act, change the world and his fate. The Age of Enlightenment initiated the creation of the concepts of "modernity" that determine the state and mission of the society existing in it in the history of mankind. Subsequently, the content of the concept began to expand, acquiring new meanings. However, at whatever angle of view the notion of "modernity" is considered, it has always been used to assess reality and determine the potentials for the development of society (in the case of postmodernism, their absence). The present work is devoted to the study of existing ideas about the concept of "modernity", as well as the characteristics of "our" modernity. In the course of the research of the problem of the present, the evolution of the concept development, the change of its semantic properties is analyzed. Accordingly, the main methods of scientific knowledge used in the article are comparative-historical, specifically sociological, formal-logical. In conclusion, the basic tendencies of understanding of "modernity" are defined, among which there are concepts unacceptable for the development of personality of the society. The work also highlights the most significant, in the author's opinion, global problems and achievements that exist today. The author makes a conclusion about the complexity and interconnectedness of various phenomena and processes of the present and calls for a conscious choice of the future of mankind on the basis of analysis (and not escape from) reality.

Keywords: industrial, chaos, development of personality, value, society, modernity, postindustrial, global problems, achievements, changes

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2017.4.22327

Article was received:

24-03-2017


Review date:

16-03-2017


Publish date:

21-04-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kapustin B.G. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya, M., 2010, s. 587–588
2.
Fikhte I.G. Osnovnye cherty sovremennoi epokhi. SPb.,1906. Lektsiya IX. S.80
3.
Kont O. Dukh pozitivnoi filosofii // http://comte.newgod.su/lib/duh-pozitivnoj-filosofii
4.
K. Marks. Predislovie k «K kritike politicheskoi ekonomii» // K. Marks, F. Engel's, Sobr. soch., t. 13, s. 7
5.
Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M., 1991. S. 302
6.
Tsendrovskii O. Yu. Kul'turno-mirovozzrencheskie osnovaniya global'nogo setevogo obshchestva XXI v. // Chelovek i kul'tura. № 5. S. 1-57
7.
Derrida Zh. O grammotologii. M.: Ad Marginem. 2000. S. 318
8.
Debor G.-E. Obshchestvo spektaklya. M., 2000. 178 s.
9.
Gavrov S. N. Modernizatsiya // Sotsiokul'turnaya antropologiya: istoriya, teoriya, metodologiya. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M., 2012. S. 821— 830
10.
The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. New York. 1960. 180 p.
11.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. M.: Akademiya, 1999. 788 s.
12.
Kalkhun K. Teorii modernizatsii i globalizatsii: kto i zachem ikh pridumyval // http://www.inop.ru/files/calhoun.doc
13.
Toffler E. Shok budushchego/ per. s angl. M., 2003. 557 s.
14.
Toffler E. Tret'ya volna /per. s angl. M., 2002. 776 s.
15.
Park R.E. Society, Colletive Behavior, News and Opinion, Sociology and Modern Society. Glensow, III., 1955. P. 322-341
16.
Abdrakhmanova D.M. Svoboda lichnosti v usloviyakh globali-zatsii: monografiya. Ufa: RIO RUNMTs MO RB, 2006. S. 143.
17.
Shilovskaya N.S. Chelovek kak sub''ekt, bytie i bytie sub''ekta v istorii i sovremennosti // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2012.-№ 1.-S.171-203. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.1.88. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_88.html
18.
Napso M.D. Obshchestvo potrebleniya i teatralizatsiya sovremennoi zhizni // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2015.-№12.-C. 1214-1219. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.12.17375.
19.
Bodriiyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konets sotsial'nogo. Ekaterinburg., 2000. 25 s.
20.
Bronzino L. Yu. Postmodernizm: sushchnostnye idei i i kh predstaviteli // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. – 2010.-№ 3. – S. 97-105
21.
S.P. Kapitsa. Skol'ko lyudei zhilo, zhivet i budet zhit' na zemle. M.: Nauka, 1999. S. 25-47
22.
D. Medouz. Predely rosta. 30 let spustya. M., 2007. 342 s.
23.
Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M., 1986. S. 390
24.
I.M. Melikov, A.A. Gezalov. Kul'tura dialoga kul'tur [Elektronnyi resurs] // Obzor mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii «Kul'tura dialoga kul'tur» (Moskva, 22 maya 2015 g.) URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1294
25.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Universal'nyi (global'nyi) evolyutsionizm i global'nye issledovaniya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2012.-№ 1.-S.46-101. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.1.116. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_116.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website